\t \t\t \tDangers of Prince Harry\u2019s security review amp up: \u2018He\u2019s almost licenced to set up as a rival\u2019 \t <\/p>\n
With concerns about the ramifications of Prince Harry\u2019s security review by the powers at be, royal commentator Daniela Elser has come forward with a warning.<\/p>\n
She presented this in a piece for News.com.au that explained just how dangerous a win is for the Royal Family, because it would completely eliminate the need for a 30 day notice, whenever the Duke of Sussex does decide to pay the UK a visit. <\/p>\n
After all, with a win that offers him security without a case-by-case basis, \u201cwhat\u2019s to stop him suddenly doing something nice and juicy and headline-grabbing on the very same day that Charles or William have some big shiny outings booked in?\u201d Ms Elser questioned. <\/p>\n
This led her to paint a different picture as well, one where she doubled down on the power Prince Harry now has because in her eyes \u201cthe duke now has practical licence to set up a competing British court of his own.\u201d<\/p>\n
A decision that will almost force the King and Prince William to potentially \u201chave to do battle with for attention, column inches and applause,\u201d she also revealed. <\/p>\n
According to the Daily Beast\u2019s Tome Sykes, this possibility is something that \u201cwill sicken William\u201d.<\/p>\n
However that is not all because a decision in the positive by the Home Office could also pose \u2018downstream consequences\u2019 of far beyond the \u2018poshest UK postcodes\u2019.<\/p>\n
Like with Meghan whose \u201cinterest in spending quality time back in the UK is up there with Harry\u2019s at learning ancient Sumerian,\u201d the commentator even quipped in her piece before signing off.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Dangers of Prince Harry\u2019s security review amp up: \u2018He\u2019s almost licenced to set up as a rival\u2019 With…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":689243,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7708],"tags":[5105,7710,519,448],"class_list":{"0":"post-689242","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-royals","8":"tag-royal","9":"tag-royal-families","10":"tag-royal-family","11":"tag-royals"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/689242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=689242"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/689242\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/689243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=689242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=689242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=689242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}