{"id":691651,"date":"2026-01-12T18:56:11","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T18:56:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/691651\/"},"modified":"2026-01-12T18:56:11","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T18:56:11","slug":"five-rules-for-scientifically-credible-nature-markets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/691651\/","title":{"rendered":"Five rules for scientifically credible nature markets"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    UNEP. State of Finance for Nature 2023 (UNEP, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kedward, K., zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Ryan-Collins, J. & Wunder, S. Heavy reliance on private finance alone will not deliver conservation goals. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7<\/b>, 1339\u20131342 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bull, J. W. & Strange, N. The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies. Nat. Sustain. 1<\/b>, 790\u2013798 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The current state, opportunities and challenges for upscaling private investment in biodiversity in Europe. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9<\/b>, 515\u2013524 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Damiens, F. L., Porter, L. & Gordon, A. The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales. Nat. Sustain. 4<\/b>, 170\u2013179 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Swinfield, T., Shrikanth, S., Bull, J. W., Madhavapeddy, A. & zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. Nature-based credit markets at a crossroads. Nat. Sustain. 7<\/b>, 1217\u20131220 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under \u2018no net loss\u2019 policies: a global review. Conserv. Lett. 12<\/b>, e12664 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rau, E.-P. et al. Mitigating risk of credit reversal in nature-based climate solutions by optimally anticipating carbon release. Carbon Manage. 15<\/b>, 2390854 (2024).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Balmford, A. et al. Realizing the social value of impermanent carbon credits. Nat. Clim. Change 13<\/b>, 1172\u20131178 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Maron, M. et al. Taming a wicked problem: resolving controversies in biodiversity offsetting. BioScience 66<\/b>, 489\u2013498 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Badgley, G. et al. California\u2019s forest carbon offsets buffer pool is severely undercapitalized. Front. For. Glob. Change 5<\/b>, 930426 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hough, P. & Robertson, M. Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: where it comes from, what it means. Wetl. Ecol. Manage. 17<\/b>, 15\u201333 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rampling, E. E., zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Hawkins, I. & Bull, J. W. Achieving biodiversity net gain by addressing governance gaps underpinning ecological compensation policies. Conserv. Biol. 38<\/b>, e14198 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Exploring the ecological outcomes of mandatory biodiversity net gain using evidence from early-adopter jurisdictions in England. Conserv. Lett. 14<\/b>, e12820 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Defra. Biodiversity Net Gain and Local Nature Recovery Strategies: Impact Assessment (Defra, 2019).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Duffus, N. E., zu Ermgassen, S.O.S.E., Grenyer, R. & Lewis, O. T. Early outcomes of England\u2032 s new biodiversity offset market. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.06.22.660961<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    White, T. B., Bull, J. W., Toombs, T. P. & Knight, A. T. Uncovering opportunities for effective species conservation banking requires navigating technical and practical complexities. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3<\/b>, e431 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Grimm, M. Regulation, the hybrid market, and species conservation: the case of conservation banking in California. Ambio 52<\/b>, 769\u2013785 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Balmford, B. Mechanism Design in Payment for Ecosystem Service Schemes. Thesis, Univ. Exeter (2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Needham, K., de Vries, F. P., Armsworth, P. R. & Hanley, N. Designing markets for biodiversity offsets: lessons from tradable pollution permits. J. Appl. Ecol. 56<\/b>, 1429\u20131435 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Teytelboym, A. Natural capital market design. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 35<\/b>, 138\u2013161 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    West, T. A. et al. Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science 381<\/b>, 873\u2013877 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sylvera. The State of Carbon Credits 2023 (Sylvera, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hahn, R. W., Hendren, N., Metcalfe, R. D. & Sprung-Keyser, B. A Welfare Analysis of Policies Impacting Climate Change (NBER, 2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Malan, M. et al. Evaluating the impacts of a large-scale voluntary REDD+ project in Sierra Leone. Nat. Sustain. 7<\/b>, 120\u2013129 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hahn, R. W. Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: how the patient followed the doctor\u2019s orders. J. Econ. Perspect. 3<\/b>, 95\u2013114 (1989).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bull, J. W. et al. Quantifying the \u2018avoided\u2019 biodiversity impacts associated with economic development. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20<\/b>, 370\u2013378 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Damiens, F. L., Backstrom, A. & Gordon, A. Governing for \u2018no net loss\u2019 of biodiversity over the long term: challenges and pathways forward. One Earth 4<\/b>, 60\u201374 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Walker, S., Brower, A. L., Stephens, R. & Lee, W. G. Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conserv. Lett. 2<\/b>, 149\u2013157 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carver, L. & Sullivan, S. How economic contexts shape calculations of yield in biodiversity offsetting. Conserv. Biol. 31<\/b>, 1053\u20131065 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The hidden biodiversity risks of increasing flexibility in biodiversity offset trades. Biol. Conserv. 252<\/b>, 108861 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Evans, M. C. Backloading to extinction: coping with values conflict in the administration of Australia\u2019s federal biodiversity offset policy. Aust. J. Public Adm. 82<\/b>, 228\u2013247 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dal B\u00f3, E. Regulatory capture: a review. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 22<\/b>, 203\u2013225 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Macintosh, A. et al. Non-compliance and under-performance in Australian human-induced regeneration projects. Rangel. J. 46<\/b>, RJ24024 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Swinfield, T. & Balmford, A. Cambridge Carbon Impact: evaluating carbon credit claims and co-benefits. Preprint at Cambridge Open Engage https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33774\/coe-2023-bl26j<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wauchope, H. S. et al. What is a unit of nature? Measurement challenges in the emerging biodiversity credit market. Proc. R. Soc. B 291<\/b>, 20242353 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lynch, J., Cain, M., Pierrehumbert, R. & Allen, M. Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and long-lived climate pollutants. Environ. Res. Lett. 15<\/b>, 044023 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Simpson, K. H., de Vries, F. P., Dallimer, M., Armsworth, P. R. & Hanley, N. Ecological and economic implications of alternative metrics in biodiversity offset markets. Conserv. Biol. 36<\/b>, e13906 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Salzman, J. & Ruhl, J. Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. Stanf. Law Rev. 53<\/b>, 607\u2013694 (2000).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robertson, M. M. The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environ. Plan. D 24<\/b>, 367\u2013387 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lave, R., Doyle, M. & Robertson, M. Privatizing stream restoration in the US. Soc. Stud. Sci. 40<\/b>, 677\u2013703 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robertson, M., Lave, R. & Doyle, M. Making a market in environmental credits I: streams of value. Environ. Plan. E 6<\/b>, 2516\u20132538 (2023).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Duffus, N. E. et al. A globally influential area-condition metric is a poor proxy for invertebrate biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 62<\/b>, 2529\u20132540 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Marshall, C. A. et al. England\u2019s statutory biodiversity metric enhances plant, but not bird nor butterfly, biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 61<\/b>, 1918\u20131931 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gamarra, M. J. C. & Toombs, T. P. Thirty years of species conservation banking in the US: comparing policy to practice. Biol. Conserv. 214<\/b>, 6\u201312 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Moilanen, A. et al. Monitoring in biodiversity offsetting. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 54<\/b>, e03039 (2024).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Inkinen, V. Wetland Mitigation Banking in the United States. Doctoral thesis, Univ. of Gothenburg (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mayfield, H. J. et al. Guidelines for selecting an appropriate currency in biodiversity offset transactions. J. Environ. Manage. 322<\/b>, 116060 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dorrough, J., Sinclair, S. J. & Oliver, I. Expert predictions of changes in vegetation condition reveal perceived risks in biodiversity offsetting. PLoS ONE 14<\/b>, e0216703 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gibbons, P., Macintosh, A., Constable, A. L. & Hayashi, K. Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting. Glob. Change Biol. 24<\/b>, e643\u2013e654 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pascoe, S., Cannard, T. & Steven, A. Offset payments can reduce environmental impacts of urban development. Environ. Sci. Policy 100<\/b>, 205\u2013210 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Defra. Nature Markets: A Framework for Scaling Up Private Investment in Nature Recovery and Sustainable Farming (Defra, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, L. & Zhang, D. Forest carbon offset protocols in compliance carbon markets. For. Policy Econ. 165<\/b>, 103253 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Akerlof, G. A. in Uncertainty in Economics (eds Diamond, P. & Rothschild, M.) 235\u2013251 (Elsevier, 1978).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jack, B. K. & Jayachandran, S. Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116<\/b>, 5326\u20135333 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Engert, J. E. & van Oosterzee, P. Limits to the ability of carbon farming projects to deliver benefits for threatened species. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9<\/b>, 134\u2013141 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation. Glob. Change Biol. 29<\/b>, 4397\u20134411 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Macintosh, A. et al. Australian human-induced native forest regeneration carbon offset projects have limited impact on changes in woody vegetation cover and carbon removals. Commun. Earth Environ. 5<\/b>, 149 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sonter, L. J., Barnes, M., Matthews, J. W. & Maron, M. Quantifying habitat losses and gains made by US Species Conservation Banks to improve compensation policies and avoid perverse outcomes. Conserv. Lett. 12<\/b>, e12629 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Badgley, G. et al. Systematic over-crediting in California\u2019s forest carbon offsets program. Glob. Change Biol. 28<\/b>, 1433\u20131445 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Coffield, S. R. et al. Using remote sensing to quantify the additional climate benefits of California forest carbon offset projects. Glob. Change Biol. 28<\/b>, 6789\u20136806 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stanley, T. & Cusworth, G. Legitimacy in the making: conservatism, additionality and natural capital accreditation in the UK\u2019s Woodland Carbon Code. Environ. Plan. E 8<\/b>, 2018\u20132037 (2025).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Maseyk, F. J., Maron, M., Gordon, A., Bull, J. W. & Evans, M. C. Improving averted loss estimates for better biodiversity outcomes from offset exchanges. Oryx 55<\/b>, 393\u2013403 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mitchell, E. et al. Making soil carbon credits work for climate change mitigation. Carbon Manage. 15<\/b>, 2430780 (2024).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schleicher, J. et al. Statistical matching for conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 34<\/b>, 538\u2013549 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Guizar-Couti\u00f1o, A., Jones, J. P., Balmford, A., Carmenta, R. & Coomes, D. A. A global evaluation of the effectiveness of voluntary REDD+ projects at reducing deforestation and degradation in the moist tropics. Conserv. Biol. 36<\/b>, e13970 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Delacote, P. et al. Restoring credibility in carbon offsets through systematic ex post evaluation. Nat. Sustain. 8<\/b>, 733\u2013740 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rau, E. P. et al. Strengthening the integrity of REDD+ credits: objectively assessing counterfactual methods using placebos. Environ. Res. Lett. 20<\/b>, 114051 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Isometric. Reforestation protocol. isometric.com https:\/\/registry.isometric.com\/protocol\/reforestation\/1.0<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Verra. VM0047 Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation v.1.1. verra.org https:\/\/verra.org\/methodologies\/vm0047-afforestation-reforestation-and-revegetation-v1-1\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Revalue. Our models. revalue.earth https:\/\/www.revalue.earth\/our-models\/avoid<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Balmford, A. et al. Time to fix the biodiversity leak. Science 387<\/b>, 720\u2013722 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meyfroidt, P. et al. Middle-range theories of land system change. Glob. Environ. Change 53<\/b>, 52\u201367 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meyfroidt, P. et al. Ten facts about land systems for sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119<\/b>, e2109217118 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Filewod, B. & McCarney, G. Avoiding carbon leakage from nature-based offsets by design. One Earth 6<\/b>, 790\u2013802 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Swinfield, T. & Toye Scott, E. Scientific credibility for high-integrity voluntary carbon markets. Preprint at Cambridge Open Engage https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33774\/coe-2025-f0j70-v2<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cerullo, G. et al. The global impact of EU forest protection policies. Science 381<\/b>, 740 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kujala, H. et al. Credible biodiversity offsetting needs public national registers to confirm no net loss. One Earth 5<\/b>, 650\u2013662 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Delacote, P. et al. Strong transparency required for carbon credit mechanisms. Nat. Sustain. 7<\/b>, 706\u2013713 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Poudel, J., Zhang, D. & Simon, B. Estimating the demand and supply of conservation banking markets in the United States. Land Use Policy 79<\/b>, 320\u2013325 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Clean Energy Regulator. Third independent review of human-induced regeneration gateway checks. cer.gov.au https:\/\/cer.gov.au\/news-and-media\/news\/2024\/december\/third-independent-review-human-induced-regeneration-gateway-checks<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Skidmore, A. K. et al. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5<\/b>, 896\u2013906 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bennett, M. M., Chen, J. K., Alvarez Leon, L. F. & Gleason, C. J. The politics of pixels: a review and agenda for critical remote sensing. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 46<\/b>, 729\u2013752 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bos, A. B. et al. Global data and tools for local forest cover loss and REDD+ performance assessment: accuracy, uncertainty, complementarity and impact. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 80<\/b>, 295\u2013311 (2019).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vatn, A. Markets in environmental governance: from theory to practice. Ecol. Econ. 117<\/b>, 225\u2013233 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lederer, M. Market making via regulation: the role of the state in carbon markets. Regul. Gov. 6<\/b>, 524\u2013544 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Clare, S. & Krogman, N. Bureaucratic slippage and environmental offset policies: the case of wetland management in Alberta. Soc. Nat. Resour. 26<\/b>, 672\u2013687 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Macintosh, A. et al. Reply to: National-scale datasets underestimate vegetation recovery in Australian human-induced native forest regeneration carbon sequestration projects. Commun. Earth Environ. 6<\/b>, 803 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    ICVCM. The Core Carbon Principles. icvcm.org https:\/\/icvcm.org\/core-carbon-principles\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Laitila, J., Moilanen, A. & Pouzols, F. M. A method for calculating minimum biodiversity offset multipliers accounting for time discounting, additionality and permanence. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5<\/b>, 1247\u20131254 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vaissi\u00e8re, A.-C., Tardieu, L., Qu\u00e9tier, F. & Roussel, S. Preferences for biodiversity offset contracts on arable land: a choice experiment study with farmers. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 45<\/b>, 553\u2013582 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Theis, S. & Poesch, M. Mitigation bank applications for freshwater systems: control mechanisms, project complexity, and caveats. PLoS ONE 19<\/b>, e0292702 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robertson, M., Galatowitsch, S. M. & Matthews, J. W. Longitudinal evaluation of vegetation richness and cover at wetland compensation sites: implications for regulatory monitoring under the Clean Water Act. Wetl. Ecol. Manage. 26<\/b>, 1089\u20131105 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Reed, M. S., McCarthy, J. M., Jensen, E. A., Everett, R. & Rudman, H. Governing high-integrity markets for ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 75<\/b>, 101760 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sax, J. L. Defending the Environment: A Strategy for Citizen Action (Knopf, 1971).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Macintosh, A., Gibbons, P., Jones, J., Constable, A. & Wilkinson, D. Delays, stoppages and appeals: an empirical evaluation of the adverse impacts of environmental citizen suits in the New South Wales land and environment court. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 69<\/b>, 94\u2013103 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Theis, S. et al. Compliance with and ecosystem function of biodiversity offsets in North American and European freshwaters. Conserv. Biol. 34<\/b>, 41\u201353 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Guizar-Couti\u00f1o, A., Coomes, D., Swinfield, T. & Jones, J. P. Sensitivity of estimates of the effectiveness of REDD+ projects to matching specifications and moving from pixels to polygons as the unit of analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2024.05.22.595326<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wunder, S. et al. Modest forest and welfare gains from initiatives for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Commun. Earth Environ. 5<\/b>, 394 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Busch, J. & Ferretti-Gallon, K. What drives and stops deforestation, reforestation, and forest degradation? An updated meta-analysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 17<\/b>, 217\u2013250 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Spash, C. L. Bulldozing biodiversity: the economics of offsets and trading-in Nature. Biol. Conserv. 192<\/b>, 541\u2013551 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Simmonds, J. S. et al. Aligning ecological compensation policies with the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework to achieve real net gain in biodiversity. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4<\/b>, e12634 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dempsey, J. et al. Biodiversity targets will not be met without debt and tax justice. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6<\/b>, 237\u2013239 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Galaz, V. et al. Tax havens and global environmental degradation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2<\/b>, 1352\u20131357 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Svartzman, R. & Althouse, J. Greening the international monetary system? Not without addressing the political ecology of global imbalances. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 29<\/b>, 844\u2013869 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Clark, M. A. et al. Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5 and 2 C climate change targets. Science 370<\/b>, 705\u2013708 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gonon, M. et al. Subsidies against Nature: a multidimensional framework for biodiversity-aligned national budgets. Ecol. Econ. 235<\/b>, 108661 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E. & Balmford, A. Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience 54<\/b>, 1119\u20131126 (2004).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wunder, S. et al. Biodiversity credits: an overview of the current state, future opportunities, and potential pitfalls. Bus. Strategy Environ. 34<\/b>, 8470\u20138499 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Atmadja, S. S. et al. How do REDD+ projects contribute to the goals of the Paris Agreement?. Environ. Res. Lett. 17<\/b>, 044038 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Calvet, C., Le Coent, P., Napoleone, C. & Qu\u00e9tier, F. Challenges of achieving biodiversity offset outcomes through agri-environmental schemes: evidence from an empirical study in Southern France. Ecol. Econ. 163<\/b>, 113\u2013125 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Grimm, M. Conserving biodiversity through offsets? Findings from an empirical study on conservation banking. J. Nat. Conserv. 57<\/b>, 125871 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fox, J. & Murcia, A. Status of species conservation banking in the United States. Conserv. Biol. 19<\/b>, 996\u20131007 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Randazzo, N. A., Gordon, D. R. & Hamburg, S. P. Improved assessment of baseline and additionality for forest carbon crediting. Ecol. Appl. 33<\/b>, e2817 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stapp, J. et al. Little evidence of management change in California\u2019s forest offset program. Commun. Earth Environ. 4<\/b>, 331 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    West, T. A., B\u00f6rner, J., Sills, E. O. & Kontoleon, A. Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117<\/b>, 24188\u201324194 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Haya, B. K. et al. Comprehensive review of carbon quantification by improved forest management offset protocols. Front. Forests Global Change 6<\/b>, 958879 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Karnik, A., Kilbride, J. B., Goodbody, T. R., Ross, R. & Ayrey, E. An open-access database of nature-based carbon offset project boundaries. Sci. Data 12<\/b>, 581 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. Native Vegetation Gain Scoring Manual (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, 2017).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. Guidelines for the Removal, Destruction or Lopping of Native Vegetation (Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, 2017).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UNEP. State of Finance for Nature 2023 (UNEP, 2023). Kedward, K., zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Ryan-Collins,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":691652,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3843],"tags":[21481,66865,12309,728,21479,3968,12308,3925,70,3695,16,15,21480],"class_list":{"0":"post-691651","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-biological-and-physical-anthropology","9":"tag-conservation-biology","10":"tag-ecology","11":"tag-environment","12":"tag-evolutionary-biology","13":"tag-general","14":"tag-life-sciences","15":"tag-paleontology","16":"tag-science","17":"tag-sustainability","18":"tag-uk","19":"tag-united-kingdom","20":"tag-zoology"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115883661238330905","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/691651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=691651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/691651\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/691652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=691651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=691651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=691651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}