Your support helps us to tell the story<\/p>\n
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.<\/p>\n
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.<\/p>\n
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.<\/p>\n
Your support makes all the difference.<\/strong>Read more<\/p>\n Independent readers have weighed in after reports that the EU<\/a> wants to include a so-called \u201cFarage clause\u201d in any post-Brexit reset deal<\/a> with the UK \u2013 a provision designed to protect Brussels if a future British government<\/a> were to tear up the agreement.<\/p>\n The proposed clause, reportedly included in draft talks on a veterinary agreement that would cut red tape<\/a> for UK food<\/a> and drink exporters, would require Britain to pay compensation if it unilaterally withdrew. <\/p>\n Nigel Farage<\/a> responded by saying he would simply \u201cbreak\u201d any such deal<\/a>, insisting that no parliament<\/a> can bind its successor.<\/p>\n But many readers pushed back strongly against that claim. Commenters repeatedly argued that while this principle applies to domestic legislation, international treaties are legally binding and governed by established rules. <\/p>\n Far from seeing the clause as punitive, many said it reflected standard international practice and was a rational response to years of Brexit-related instability in UK politics. <\/p>\n Others argued the EU<\/a> was right to futureproof any deal against political volatility, particularly given the possibility of Reform UK<\/a> entering government<\/a>.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s what you had to say:<\/p>\n No anchor to reality<\/strong><\/p>\n As usual, Farage plays to the sycophants, but with no anchor to reality.<\/p>\n It is correct that a parliament<\/a> cannot bind its successor in respect to legislation. Should Labour legislate to have closer ties to the EU, then a Farage government could repeal it.<\/p>\n But that is not the same as an international agreement. Farage would have to meet the terms of withdrawing from an agreement. If he didn\u2019t, then the UK would be in breach \u2013 an extremely serious matter for a country to do so, not least because of the lack of trust it would create in executing any future agreements with the UK. There would be chaos.<\/p>\n So, while Farage huffs and puffs, the EU is entirely correct to introduce compensation clauses should the UK unilaterally withdraw and it can fully expect the UK to pay that compensation.<\/p>\n Yeravinalarf<\/a><\/p>\n A businessman who doesn\u2019t understand contracts<\/strong><\/p>\n For a supposed businessman, Farage seems to have little understanding of contracts, let alone international arrangements. Given how much he has helped to cost the UK already, people need to understand just how damaging he can be.<\/p>\n Like it or not, reducing the needless bureaucracy of trading with the EU can only be a good thing. Ask the farmers and fishermen who believed Farage the first time around!<\/p>\n Petetheterrible<\/a><\/p>\n Once bitten, twice shy<\/strong><\/p>\n I don\u2019t blame the EU for wanting to future-proof any deal. I\u2019ve long thought that one of the difficulties for the rejoin movement would be that readmitting the UK would be risky for the EU as long as Brexit remains a party political issue. We won\u2019t be able to move past Brexit until the Tories accept that it is a lost cause and Reform\u2019s support fades.<\/p>\n Tanaquil2<\/a><\/p>\n A bitter divorce analogy<\/strong><\/p>\n Maybe it is better for the EU itself to let us be as we were.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s face it, we\u2019re a country still not recognising the enormous damage we did to ourselves by leaving the EU. Half of us still blame the EU for us leaving. A bit like an angry husband leaving his wife and children, only to be left with a lifetime of regret, focused anger on the ex-spouse. Still not recognising the divorce when it comes to his selfish, assumed privileges. And even worse \u2013 she is better off without him.<\/p>\n Because this is frankly Farage\u2019s story when it comes to the EU, as half the country contemplates making him prime minister.<\/p>\n A clever EU therefore indeed sets some standards and legal demands when it comes to such an ex-spouse. Because there is little love left. And the world has changed. With Russia and the US playing imperial games, it is best for the EU to recognise its own needs before inviting a potential British fifth column among its ranks.<\/p>\n Because let\u2019s face it, it is not the European dream that drives British desires, but a desire for privileges once there but then taken away by the divorce \u2013 financial privileges, mainly. That is all. Not a heart for Europe, as Farage\u2019s followers will claim \u2013 they are British!<\/p>\n Let it therefore be a cold piece of paper. Legal paper that leaves nothing to chance. In it, the penalties for non-compliance.<\/p>\n The last thing Europe needs is another British divorce.<\/p>\n Brad<\/a><\/p>\n A risky reset<\/strong><\/p>\n Starmer and Labour should not ignore the fact that this government is deeply unpopular and will most likely be defeated at the next general election.<\/p>\n So far, it\u2019s difficult to see any net benefit in any of the reset deals Starmer has agreed with Brussels.<\/p>\n For example, the Erasmus deal will cost the UK at least \u00a3570m per year and will likely benefit twice the number of EU students as it does British students.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, the UK\u2019s replacement for Erasmus, the Turing scheme, is now well established, meaning even less demand for Erasmus from our own students. This scheme is considerably more cost-effective and has a much higher participation rate than Erasmus ever had. But Starmer just had to get his reset, didn\u2019t he. I can hear the laughter in Brussels from here.<\/p>\n Ian Robinson<\/a><\/p>\n Who can blame them?<\/strong><\/p>\n What a conundrum. The UK is desperate for any deals with the EU that will alleviate the financial mess, border controls, red tape<\/a> and the rest caused by Brexit, as well as improving its economic prospects and hopefully alleviating some of the cost of living crisis, but it will certainly come at a price for both sides.<\/p>\n The EU, meanwhile, is, how shall we say, once bitten and twice shy. As setting up any deal will take months, if not a year or two, the EU is determined to protect itself against any changes \u2013 Farage or otherwise \u2013 in UK leadership that could result in the deal being abandoned and the EU picking up the bill for what would be considerable changes to reverse administrative and border infrastructure. Who can blame them?<\/p>\n Ambigirls<\/a><\/p>\n A mess the EU should avoid<\/strong><\/p>\n More importantly, what this is saying is that Farage as PM is a real possibility. In relation to the EU, we have become a mess that they should not touch. We were always considered outsiders. I remember clearly, pre-Brexit, when they were coming out of voting for something or other and one of the MEPs said, \u201cWe are being blocked by the British yet again\u201d. We were never a good fit.<\/p>\n Michael<\/a><\/p>\n Better safe than sorry<\/strong><\/p>\n The EU is being cautious \u2013 very wise after all the upheavals and unpleasantness the UK has caused. Although I think Reform is beginning to unravel and will probably have disappeared by the next general election, like Ukip and the Brexit Party, it is better to be safe than sorry.<\/p>\n HASTINGSPIER<\/a><\/p>\n Some of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.<\/p>\n Want to share <\/strong>your views<\/strong><\/a>? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day\u2019s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click \u2018log in\u2019 or \u2018register\u2019 in the top right corner to sign in or sign up<\/strong><\/p>\n Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found <\/strong>here<\/strong><\/a>. For a full guide on how to comment, <\/strong>click here<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Your support helps us to tell the story From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":693530,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5226],"tags":[802,748,2000,299,5187,1699,4884,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-693529","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-brexit","8":"tag-brexit","9":"tag-britain","10":"tag-eu","11":"tag-europe","12":"tag-european","13":"tag-european-union","14":"tag-great-britain","15":"tag-uk","16":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115888859672669686","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/693529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=693529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/693529\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/693530"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=693529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=693529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=693529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}