{"id":709204,"date":"2026-01-20T18:52:11","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T18:52:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/709204\/"},"modified":"2026-01-20T18:52:11","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T18:52:11","slug":"spacex-didnt-properly-inspect-crane-before-collapse-at-starbase-osha-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/709204\/","title":{"rendered":"SpaceX didn&#8217;t properly inspect crane before collapse at Starbase, OSHA says"},"content":{"rendered":"<p id=\"speakable-summary\" class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">SpaceX didn\u2019t properly inspect a hydraulic crane that had recently been repaired before it collapsed at the company\u2019s Starbase, Texas, facility last June, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As a result, the federal safety agency <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osha.gov\/ords\/imis\/establishment.inspection_detail?id=1833452.015\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">has hit SpaceX<\/a> with seven \u201cserious\u201d violations related to its investigation, which it opened one day after the crane collapse. OSHA issued the maximum financial penalty it can levy on six of those \u201cserious\u201d violations, giving Elon Musk\u2019s spaceflight company a combined fine of $115,850.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">OSHA\u2019s probe is still open according to the agency\u2019s website. It\u2019s still unclear whether any workers were harmed in the accident. SpaceX is able to contest the penalties; the company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The penalty and violations come as SpaceX is set to ramp up activity at the Starbase facility, partly fueled by a race to fulfill President Donald Trump\u2019s goal of returning astronauts to the moon by the end of his second term. The company has clearance from the Federal Aviation Administration to perform as many as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/science\/spacex-gets-faa-approval-ramp-up-starship-launches-texas-2025-05-06\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">25 Starship launches in Texas this year<\/a>. At the same time, it is undergoing rapid expansion of the launch complex to meet Musk\u2019s grand ambitions of building <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/elonmusk\/status\/2007845976204296665\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">thousands of Starship rockets per year<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">SpaceX has had a long history of injuries at the South Texas launch complex. A 2023 Reuters report uncovered <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/investigates\/special-report\/spacex-musk-safety\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">dozens of previously unreported injuries<\/a> \u2014 and one employee death \u2014 that happened as the facility was built up across the last decade. A TechCrunch analysis of OSHA data last year <a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2025\/07\/18\/spacex-worker-injury-rates-at-starbase-outpace-industry-rivals\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">showed<\/a> SpaceX has a much higher injury rate at the Starbase site than at other facilities run by the company, or those of its industry peers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Accidents keep happening, too. In December, an employee of a SpaceX subcontractor filed a lawsuit against SpaceX after he was allegedly crushed by a large metal support dropped from a crane. OSHA is also investigating that accident, as <a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2025\/12\/10\/osha-investigating-new-crane-accident-at-spacexs-starbase-facility\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">TechCrunch first reported<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2025\/06\/27\/spacexs-starbase-city-officials-silent-on-crane-collapse\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">crane collapse<\/a> at the center of the new OSHA penalty happened on June 24, 2025. SpaceX employees at a Starbase test site were cleaning up debris from a <a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2025\/06\/19\/spacexs-starship-blows-up-ahead-of-10th-test-flight\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Starship explosion just four days prior<\/a>. Footage captured by LabPadre, which posts livestreams of the Starbase site, showed a crane buckling under the weight of a large piece of the exploded Starship.<\/p>\n<p>Techcrunch event<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSan Francisco<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t|<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tOctober 13-15, 2026\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the new citations posted to OSHA\u2019s website, one employee <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osha.gov\/ords\/imis\/establishment.violation_detail?id=1833452.015&amp;citation_id=01006\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">was using<\/a> a Grove RT9150E crane to lift the debris while another used an excavator\u2019s bucket to inspect it, in hopes of determining the cause of the explosion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That Grove crane had recently been repaired, according to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osha.gov\/ords\/imis\/establishment.violation_detail?id=1833452.015&amp;citation_id=01002\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">citations<\/a>, and returned to SpaceX \u201cwithout the employer ensuring repairs met manufacturer\u2019s criteria via an inspection by a qualified person.\u201d It is not clear why the crane was repaired, but another citation states a Grove RT9150E crane at the test site had a computer that would not start until \u201cmultiple attempts\u201d were made.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">OSHA claims SpaceX was either not performing or not documenting <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osha.gov\/ords\/imis\/establishment.violation_detail?id=1833452.015&amp;citation_id=01004B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">monthly inspections<\/a> on the Grove crane and that it <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osha.gov\/ords\/imis\/establishment.violation_detail?id=1833452.015&amp;citation_id=01005\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">hadn\u2019t been inspected<\/a> \u201cwithin the last 12 months.\u201d SpaceX did not perform monthly inspections of the wire rope being used to move debris either, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osha.gov\/ords\/imis\/establishment.violation_detail?id=1833452.015&amp;citation_id=01004A\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">according to OSHA<\/a>. And OSHA claims rigging equipment used at the site was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.osha.gov\/ords\/imis\/establishment.violation_detail?id=1833452.015&amp;citation_id=01001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">missing<\/a> manufacturer-prescribed markings that are supposed to detail a \u201csafe working load.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As part of its investigation, OSHA also found that an employee had been operating a Tadano 90-ton crawler crane to move debris at the test site with an expired certification from the National Commission for the Certification of Crane Operators.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"SpaceX didn\u2019t properly inspect a hydraulic crane that had recently been repaired before it collapsed at the company\u2019s&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":709205,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[3844],"tags":[295,70,413,1603,1986,1987,16,15],"class_list":["post-709204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-space","tag-elon-musk","tag-science","tag-space","tag-spacex","tag-starbase","tag-starship","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115928940230389759","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=709204"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709204\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/709205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=709204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=709204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=709204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}