{"id":709345,"date":"2026-01-20T20:21:16","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T20:21:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/709345\/"},"modified":"2026-01-20T20:21:16","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T20:21:16","slug":"dynamical-simulations-of-many-body-quantum-chaos-on-a-quantum-computer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/709345\/","title":{"rendered":"Dynamical simulations of many-body quantum chaos on a quantum computer"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Miessen, A., Ollitrault, P. J., Tacchino, F. & Tavernelli, I. Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3<\/b>, 25\u201337 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fisher, M. P. A., Khemani, V., Nahum, A. & Vijay, S. Random quantum circuits. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14<\/b>, 335\u2013379 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hangleiter, D. & Eisert, J. Computational advantage of quantum random sampling. Rev. Modern Phys. 95<\/b>, 035001 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, Y., Chen, X. & Fisher, M. P. A. Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition. Phys. Rev. B 98<\/b>, 205136 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Skinner, B., Ruhman, J. & Nahum, A. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. X 9<\/b>, 031009 (2019).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mi, X. et al. Time-crystalline eigenstate order on a quantum processor. Nature 601<\/b>, 531\u2013536 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    S\u00fcnderhauf, C., P\u00e9rez-Garc\u00eda, D., Huse, D. A., Schuch, N. & Cirac, J. I. Localization with random time-periodic quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. B 98<\/b>, 134204 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Garratt, S. J. & Chalker, J. T. Many-body delocalization as symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127<\/b>, 026802 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Morningstar, A., Colmenarez, L., Khemani, V., Luitz, D. J. & Huse, D. A. Avalanches and many-body resonances in many-body localized systems. Phys. Rev. B 105<\/b>, 174205 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vanicat, M., Zadnik, L. & Prosen, T. Integrable trotterization: local conservation laws and boundary driving. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121<\/b>, 030606 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chan, A., De Luca, A. & Chalker, J. T. Solution of a minimal model for many-body quantum chaos. Phys. Rev. X 8<\/b>, 041019 (2018).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertini, B., Kos, P. & Prosen, T. Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121<\/b>, 264101 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertini, B., Kos, P. & Prosen, T. Random matrix spectral form factor of dual-unitary quantum circuits. Commun. Math. Phys. 387<\/b>, 597\u2013620 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertini, B., Kos, P. & Prosen, T. Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1 + 1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123<\/b>, 210601 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gopalakrishnan, S. & Lamacraft, A. Unitary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels. Phys. Rev. B 100<\/b>, 064309 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Piroli, L., Bertini, B., Cirac, J. I. & Prosen, T. Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. B 101<\/b>, 094304 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertini, B., Kos, P. & Prosen, T. Operator entanglement in local quantum circuits I: chaotic dual-unitary circuits. SciPost Physics 8<\/b>, 067 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ippoliti, M. & Khemani, V. Postselection-free entanglement dynamics via spacetime duality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126<\/b>, 060501 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Suzuki, R., Mitarai, K. & Fujii, K. Computational power of one-and two-dimensional dual-unitary quantum circuits. Quantum 6<\/b>, 631 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Claeys, P. W. & Lamacraft, A. Maximum velocity quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Res. 2<\/b>, 033032 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertini, B. & Piroli, L. Scrambling in random unitary circuits: exact results. Phys. Rev. B 102<\/b>, 064305 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chertkov, E. et al. Holographic dynamics simulations with a trapped-ion quantum computer. Nat. Phys. 18<\/b>, 1074\u20131079 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bertini, B., Kos, P. & Prosen, T. Entanglement spreading in a minimal model of maximal many-body quantum chaos. Phys. Rev. X 9<\/b>, 021033 (2019).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhou, T. & Harrow, A. W. Maximal entanglement velocity implies dual unitarity. Phys. Rev. B 106<\/b>, L201104 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mi, X. et al. Information scrambling in quantum circuits. Science 374<\/b>, 1479\u20131483 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Keenan, N., Robertson, N. F., Murphy, T., Zhuk, S. & Goold, J. Evidence of Kardar\u2013Parisi\u2013Zhang scaling on a digital quantum simulator. npj Quantum Inf. 9<\/b>, 72 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kim, Y. et al. Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance. Nature 618<\/b>, 500\u2013505 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robledo-Moreno, J. et al. Chemistry beyond the scale of exact diagonalization on a quantum-centric supercomputer. Sci. Adv. 11<\/b>, eadu9991 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shinjo, K., Seki, K., Shirakawa, T., Sun, R.-Y. & Yunoki, S. Unveiling clean two-dimensional discrete time quasicrystals on a digital quantum computer. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2403.16718<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Farrell, R. C., Illa, M., Ciavarella, A. N. & Savage, M. J. Quantum simulations of hadron dynamics in the schwinger model using 112 qubits. Phys. Rev. D 109<\/b>, 114510 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shtanko, O. et al. Uncovering local integrability in quantum many-body dynamics. Nat. Commun. 16<\/b>, 2552 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Temme, K., Bravyi, S. & Gambetta, J. M. Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119<\/b>, 180509 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, Y. & Benjamin, S. C. Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization. Phys. Rev. X 7<\/b>, 021050 (2017).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kandala, A. et al. Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor. Nature 567<\/b>, 491\u2013495 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Van Den Berg, E., Minev, Z. K., Kandala, A. & Temme, K. Probabilistic error cancellation with sparse pauli\u2013lindblad models on noisy quantum processors. Nat. Phys. 19<\/b>, 1116\u20131121 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zimbor\u00e1s, Z. et al. Myths around quantum computation before full fault tolerance: what no-go theorems rule out and what they don\u2019t. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2501.05694<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Govia, L. et al. Bounding the systematic error in quantum error mitigation due to model violation. PRX Quantum 6<\/b>, 010354 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Filippov, S., Leahy, M., Rossi, M. A. C. & Garc\u00eda-P\u00e9rez, G. Scalable tensor-network error mitigation for near-term quantum computing. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2307.11740<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Filippov, S. N., Maniscalco, S. & Garc\u00eda-P\u00e9rez, G. Scalability of quantum error mitigation techniques: from utility to advantage. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2403.13542<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Prosen, T. General relation between quantum ergodicity and fidelity of quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 65<\/b>, 036208 (2002).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Akila, M., Waltner, D., Gutkin, B. & Guhr, T. Particle-time duality in the kicked ising spin chain. J. Phys. A 49<\/b>, 375101 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16<\/b>, 1050\u20131057 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Glos, A. et al. Adaptive POVM implementations and measurement error mitigation strategies for near-term quantum devices. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2208.07817<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bennett, C. H. et al. Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76<\/b>, 722\u2013725 (1996).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Knill, E. Fault-tolerant postselected quantum computation: threshold analysis. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/quant-ph\/0404104<\/a> (2004).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wallman, J. J. & Emerson, J. Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling. Phys. Rev. A 94<\/b>, 052325 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hashim, A. et al. Randomized compiling for scalable quantum computing on a noisy superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. X 11<\/b>, 041039 (2021).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, S. et al. The learnability of Pauli noise. Nat. Commun. 14<\/b>, 52 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, S., Zhang, Z., Jiang, L. & Flammia, S. T. Efficient self-consistent learning of gate set Pauli noise. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2410.03906<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kim, Y. et al. Error mitigation with stabilized noise in superconducting quantum processors. Nat. Commun. 16<\/b>, 8439 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ljubotina, M., Zadnik, L. & Prosen, T. Ballistic spin transport in a periodically driven integrable quantum system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122<\/b>, 150605 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Long, D. M., Crowley, P. J. D., Khemani, V. & Chandran, A. Phenomenology of the prethermal many-body localized regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131<\/b>, 106301 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Eddins, A., Tran, M. C. & Rall, P. Lightcone shading for classically accelerated quantum error mitigation. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2409.04401<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robertson, N. F. et al. Tensor network enhanced dynamic multiproduct formulas. PRX Quantum 6<\/b>, 020360 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stehlik, J. et al. Tunable coupling architecture for fixed-frequency transmon superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127<\/b>, 080505 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wack, A. et al. Scale, quality, and speed: three key attributes to measure the performance of near-term quantum computers. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2110.14108<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rajagopala, A. D. et al. Hardware-assisted parameterized circuit execution. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2409.03725<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Van Den Berg, E., Minev, Z. K. & Temme, K. Model-free readout-error mitigation for quantum expectation values. Phys. Rev. A 105<\/b>, 032620 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tsubouchi, K., Sagawa, T. & Yoshioka, N. Universal cost bound of quantum error mitigation based on quantum estimation theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131<\/b>, 210601 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Data and code for: dynamical simulations of many-body quantum chaos on a quantum computer. Figshare https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6084\/m9.figshare.29069759<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Miessen, A., Ollitrault, P. J., Tacchino, F. & Tavernelli, I. Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics. Nat. Comput. Sci.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":709346,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3845],"tags":[11701,11700,11705,11704,3968,11699,11702,11703,74,17844,15192,70,11698,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-709345","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-atomic","9":"tag-classical-and-continuum-physics","10":"tag-complex-systems","11":"tag-condensed-matter-physics","12":"tag-general","13":"tag-mathematical-and-computational-physics","14":"tag-molecular","15":"tag-optical-and-plasma-physics","16":"tag-physics","17":"tag-quantum-mechanics","18":"tag-quantum-simulation","19":"tag-science","20":"tag-theoretical","21":"tag-uk","22":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115929294009413241","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=709345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709345\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/709346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=709345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=709345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=709345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}