{"id":796237,"date":"2026-03-01T05:21:11","date_gmt":"2026-03-01T05:21:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/796237\/"},"modified":"2026-03-01T05:21:11","modified_gmt":"2026-03-01T05:21:11","slug":"a-strong-europe-is-within-reach-a-perspective-from-ukraine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/796237\/","title":{"rendered":"A Strong Europe is Within Reach: A Perspective from Ukraine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In mid-February, media outlets <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailystar.co.uk\/news\/latest-news\/russia-developing-upgraded-missile-could-36761166\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reported<\/a> that Russia was developing the so-called \u2018Son of Oreshnik\u2019 \u2013 an allegedly \u201cunstoppable\u201d ballistic missile. It is intended to replace the \u2018Oreshnik\u2019, which has already been used twice against Ukraine. Earlier, it <a href=\"https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/world-news\/2026\/01\/28\/china-helping-russia-build-nuclear-capable-missile\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">became known<\/a> that China is assisting Russia in the production of this missile. It is possible that Moscow, which is becoming more dependent on Beijing in many areas, will again ask for help in manufacturing this new type of weapon.<\/p>\n<p>The Oreshnik is an intermediate-range ballistic missile with a maximum range of around 5,500 km, posing a direct threat mainly to Europe, while much of the United States lies beyond its reach. The strike on Lviv (a Ukrainian city on the border with Poland, a member of the European Union and NATO) using the missile on the night of 8\u20139 January was widely seen as a warning to Europe. Ukrainian member of parliament Oleksiy Honcharenko, commenting on discussions about a possible European peacekeeping contingent in Ukraine, captured the Kremlin\u2019s message: \u201cIf you want to introduce forces into western Ukraine, this is what will happen. Moreover, if the Oreshnik reaches Lviv in 10\u201315 minutes, how long would it take to reach Warsaw or Berlin? A difference of a few minutes is hardly significant.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Concurrently, the Center for Strategic and International Studies <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csis.org\/analysis\/russias-grinding-war-ukraine\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">report<\/a> \u201cRussia\u2019s Grinding War in Ukraine\u201d detailed China\u2019s role in sustaining and expanding Russia\u2019s ballistic missile production. Beijing provides critical dual-use items \u2013 machine tools, microchips, sensors and chemicals like ammonium perchlorate (essential for solid rocket propellant). Chinese supplies reportedly account for up to 70% of Russia\u2019s recent ammonium perchlorate imports. Overall, China constitutes about 34% of Russia\u2019s foreign trade turnover \u2013 roughly a quarter of a trillion US dollars annually.<\/p>\n<p>However China consistently denies bolstering Russia\u2019s military capabilities. On 29 January, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated that Beijing does not exploit the conflict for gain and views such accusations as attempts to shift blame onto China.<\/p>\n<p>Yet over four years of war, China has repeatedly misled the international community about its role. Officials long denied any military assistance, but in 2024 a Russian state-owned defense firm <a href=\"https:\/\/opinions.glavred.net\/ukraina-ne-dolzhna-ostatsya-s-kitayskoy-ugrozoy-odin-na-odin-10667675.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">tested<\/a> an unmanned aerial vehicle on Chinese soil with Chinese specialists involved. Beijing also claimed no Chinese citizens serve in Russian forces, yet in April 2025 President Zelenskyy announced the <a href=\"https:\/\/edition.cnn.com\/2025\/04\/09\/world\/video\/ukraine-russia-china-nationals-ldn-digvid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">capture<\/a> of two Chinese nationals fighting for Russia in Donetsk, stressing these were not isolated cases and the real number on the front line is significantly higher.<\/p>\n<p>Against this backdrop, Chinese peacekeeping proposals or peace statements face deep scepticism. In September 2025, EU High Representative Kaja Kallas stated: \u201cWhile Western leaders gather in diplomacy, an autocratic alliance [China, Russia, Iran and North Korea] is seeking a fast track to a new world order. These are not just anti-Western optics; this is a direct challenge to the international system built on rules. And it is not just symbolic: Russia\u2019s war in Ukraine is being sustained by Chinese support. These are realities that Europe needs to confront.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Amid growing European concern over strategic risks from closer China ties, French President Emmanuel Macron\u2019s 20 January Davos <a href=\"https:\/\/www.weforum.org\/stories\/2026\/01\/davos-2026-special-address-by-emmanuel-macron-president-of-france\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">remarks<\/a> surprised many. He welcomed more direct Chinese investment in Europe to overcome the current crisis: \u201cChina is welcome, but what we need is more Chinese foreign direct investments in Europe.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This may reflect Paris\u2019s effort to counterbalance the confrontational US stance under Donald Trump \u2013 including disputes over Greenland. Yet if translated into policy, it risks enabling deeper Chinese economic penetration \u2013 a tactic Beijing often uses in hybrid influence strategies through acquiring strategic assets and infrastructure.<\/p>\n<p>Europe should not see China as a reliable partner or counterweight to US pressures. Russia\u2019s experience shows the high cost of dependence on Beijing: Chinese support prevented immediate collapse early in the war, but Russia has become increasingly subordinated in economic, technological and defense spheres. On 20 January, Kyrylo Budanov, Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine (and former chief of military intelligence), stated that \u201cChina is actively absorbing Russia\u201d, exploiting Moscow\u2019s vulnerability under sanctions.<\/p>\n<p>Europe now faces a historic chance to strengthen strategic autonomy and become a truly independent global actor. The US distancing from European affairs \u2013 worsened by Greenland and other disagreements \u2013 will hurt, but can catalyze greater self-reliance.<\/p>\n<p>Turning to China may seem the easiest short-term fix for transatlantic strains, yet it carries severe long-term risks. Dependence on an economy four times larger than Russia\u2019s would be far harder to unwind than the shift from Russian energy. Closer ties with Beijing would also increase indirect dependence on Moscow, given China\u2019s role as Russia\u2019s top resource buyer and the tight interconnections between the two regimes.<\/p>\n<p>There are no valid grounds to doubt Europe\u2019s capacity to pursue an independent foreign policy without constantly deferring to other powers. The United States (population ~349 million, nominal Gross domestic product ~$32 trillion) remains the world\u2019s leading power. Why then does a united Europe \u2013 with ~450 million people and combined nominal GDP of ~$22.5 trillion (still ahead of China\u2019s ~$20.7 trillion) \u2013 view its potential as a major global center with such pessimism?<\/p>\n<p>Right now, amid US political turbulence, Europe has a unique opportunity: to emerge as the recognized leader of the global democratic community and defend humanity\u2019s hard-won values of freedom against aggressive authoritarian regimes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In mid-February, media outlets reported that Russia was developing the so-called \u2018Son of Oreshnik\u2019 \u2013 an allegedly \u201cunstoppable\u201d&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":756627,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5174],"tags":[1395,473,3647,2000,299,5187,1699,16419,391,332,657,659],"class_list":["post-796237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-eu","tag-china","tag-defense","tag-economics","tag-eu","tag-europe","tag-european","tag-european-union","tag-front","tag-opinion","tag-russia","tag-ukraine","tag-usa"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/116152243911619892","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/796237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=796237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/796237\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/756627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=796237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=796237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=796237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}