{"id":830537,"date":"2026-03-16T23:20:20","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T23:20:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/830537\/"},"modified":"2026-03-16T23:20:20","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T23:20:20","slug":"will-scotland-be-the-first-to-legalise-assisted-dying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/830537\/","title":{"rendered":"Will Scotland be the first to legalise assisted dying?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">There is another potential stumbling block for the bill.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">The Scottish Parliament&#8217;s powers are limited and do not extend to the regulation of &#8220;medicines, medical supplies, and poisons&#8221; or of health professionals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">As the bill needs both, it will require Westminster cooperation to become law.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">The UK government says it is neutral on the matter and has agreed to ensure the Scottish government has the relevant powers over &#8220;substances or devices&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">The regulation of medical professionals is trickier.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">The draft bill included legal protections for medical staff who do not wish to participate in the process of assisted dying, meaning conscientious objectors can opt out without suffering any detriment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">The UK and Scottish governments have discussed dealing with this problem by means of a transfer of powers known as a section 104 order.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">This would require the bill to be stripped of the problematic provisions before it was passed, with MSPs trusting that Westminster would then reinsert them into the act.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">Scottish secretary Douglas Alexander signalled that the UK government would be prepared to do so.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">But in February, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rpharms.com\/Portals\/0\/RPS%20document%20library\/Open%20access\/Scotland\/Consensus%20statement%20-%20ADTIA%20(Scotland)%20Bill%20-%20FINAL.pdf\" class=\"ssrcss-1e0jzsh-InlineLink e1kn3p7n0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a group of seven medical organisations said this would mean &#8220;inadequate scrutiny.&#8221;, external<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">Such matters, they said, &#8220;should not be left to a later process in which detailed debate, amendment, and accountability are significantly constrained&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">McArthur said that problem had now been solved by passing amendments to the bill which would prevent it being implemented until protections were re-inserted.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">That was welcomed by the British Medical Association but the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society said it was not enough.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">Both colleges now say they are opposed to the bill in its current form because MSPs will not be able to clarify and scrutinise the exact wording of the protections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">The Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland said the development had &#8220;drastically weakened essential safeguards&#8221; and the bill &#8220;now poses unacceptable risks to the general public and the psychiatric workforce.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"ssrcss-1q0x1qg-Paragraph e1jhz7w10\">The upshot is that after months of careful consideration this bill might fall not because a majority of MSPs oppose it in principle but because the Scottish could not enact it in a satisfactory manner under the current framework of devolution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"There is another potential stumbling block for the bill. The Scottish Parliament&#8217;s powers are limited and do not&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":830538,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5009],"tags":[748,4884,712,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-830537","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-scotland","8":"tag-britain","9":"tag-great-britain","10":"tag-scotland","11":"tag-uk","12":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/116241421242613593","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=830537"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830537\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/830538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=830537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=830537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=830537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}