{"id":85684,"date":"2025-05-08T21:55:10","date_gmt":"2025-05-08T21:55:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/85684\/"},"modified":"2025-05-08T21:55:10","modified_gmt":"2025-05-08T21:55:10","slug":"time100-health-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/85684\/","title":{"rendered":"TIME100 Health: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/magazineshop.us\/T100Health\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Buy a copy of the TIME100 Health issue here<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">Health officials and the public argued that the WHO was too slow in responding after the first COVID-19 cases emerged from China (a WHO member), and that it did not take a stronger stand against China when the country failed to follow through on agreements to allow WHO scientists in to learn about the new virus. Public-health experts say the two years it took for the WHO to admit the SARS-CoV-2 virus could be transmitted through the air\u2014long after ample evidence was available\u2014hampered attempts to control spread, as the organization focused mostly on advising people to wash their hands.<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">\u201cNo question in my mind that WHO was far too slow on the initial response,\u201d says Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of Brown University School of Public Health who served as President Biden\u2019s chief COVID-19 advisor and interacted regularly with Ghebreyesus during the pandemic. \u201cEven after China informed WHO formally, for a while WHO took China at its word on almost all issues. My view is that WHO should be an independent organ that assesses its own data.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">Ghrebeysus says he, and the WHO, did what was in its power to do to persuade Chinese president Xi Jinping to share data and allow WHO teams to visit the hardest hit areas. \u201cWe went there and convinced him to allow us to send a team; he said OK,\u201d he says of his visit to Beijing to speak to Xi. But the WHO has no authority to force China to make good on that promise, he says. \u201cWe couldn\u2019t do more than we did, because it\u2019s up to governments to cooperate. All the allegations, especially that we were not doing what we were mandated to do with China, is based on lies. We have done what we were expected to do and even beyond.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">In response to criticisms of the WHO\u2019s response to COVID-19, Ghebreyesus spearheaded the Pandemic Accord. For the past three years, all of the WHO\u2019s 194 member states have planned and negotiated the accord, laying out how the world would respond to any future pandemics. A final version was reached in April\u2014with everyone on board but the U.S.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">To Ghebreyesus, this serves as evidence of WHO\u2019s willingness to acknowledge its mistakes and fix any problems. During the vaccine rollout, for example, manufacturing countries\u2014primarily the U.S.\u2014reserved doses for its populations while people in lower resource countries went without. Under the Pandemic Accord, member states agreed that 10% of the production of any new drug or vaccine would go to the WHO, which would in turn dole out the doses more equitably to countries based on need. The accord creates a standardized system for countries to share samples and learn from new infectious agents more easily, which could speed development of vaccines and treatments. \u201cDo you call it mismanagement if you try your best, identify weaknesses, and work to improve?\u201d says Ghebreyesus. \u201cIt cannot be mismanagement.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">But seemingly, Trump\u2019s biggest issue with the WHO is how much the U.S. pays in membership dues, which are the highest of the members. \u201cThe U.S. is complaining they are high, and we agree,\u201d says Ghebreyesus. \u201cAnd the surprising part is that we want the U.S. to pay less, so our interests are aligned. We don\u2019t want to depend on a few traditional donors, including the U.S.\u201d While member states pay dues calculated from a number of factors including their economic stability, some, including the U.S, contribute additional funds voluntarily. From 2022 to 2023, for example, the U.S.\u2019s dues were $218 million, but it added $1.02 billion in voluntary donations. When he became director-general, Ghebreyesus anticipated the danger of relying on a handful of major donors, so he asked the 194 member states to gradually increase their dues to account for about 50%, rather than 20%, of the WHO\u2019s budget by 2030, to which they agreed. <\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">That base would mean the organization wouldn\u2019t be overly dependent on the generosity of a few. \u201cIf we rely on a few traditional donors, they will tend to dictate,\u201d he says. \u201cAnd that denies the WHO independence.\u201d The WHO isn\u2019t alone with this scenario, as the U.S. is the largest donor overall to the U.N., contributing more than a quarter of its budget for humanitarian, peacekeeping, and economic and social development programs\u2014which Trump has also signalled he would review, accusing the U.N. of being ineffective in addressing conflicts and social instability around the world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">As much of a shock as the U.S.\u2019s financial actions have been to the global health community, Ghebreyesus\u2014ever glass-half-full\u2014also sees the events of the past few months as a catalyst to address the issue of aid dependence. \u201cAs an African, this is a good opportunity to focus on self-reliance,\u201d he says. \u201cWhat we need is fair trade, jobs, and development that is self-sustaining. It\u2019s embarrassing to live on handouts from somebody\u2014it\u2019s not right. I see what President Trump has done as an opportunity for all of the developing world, to change the mindset of aid dependency, in the same way I see this as an opportunity for WHO to make us more empowered.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-center\">***<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">Ghebreyesus is the first director general to hail from Africa, and also the first without a medical degree. He was born in Asmara, Eritrea, before the country became independent and was still part of Ethiopia. His early exposure to violence and conflict from the civil unrest in the area, as well as tragic experiences with infectious diseases, shaped his desire to find, and do good, in the world. When his younger brother was around three, he died of what Ghebreyesus now believes was measles\u2014a preventable childhood disease. He remembers his mother ushering him and his siblings under the bed, and piling additional mattresses on top, hoping that the bulk would stop any bullets from reaching them. \u201cOf course, if a mortar hit, the entire house would be destroyed,\u201d he says, \u201cbut that\u2019s a mother\u2019s intuition.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">He studied biology at the University of Asmara and earned a scholarship, sponsored by the WHO, to get a master\u2019s degree at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. \u201cI would never have expected that someone who earned a WHO scholarship would one day be its head,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">His work in combating malaria in Ethiopia elevated him to the position of Minister of Health, where he first demonstrated a penchant for grassroots strategies for promoting health. He championed a community-based program of mostly women to educate and dispense much-needed health care services to lower maternal and child mortality rates by about 60%. He then shifted to Minister of Foreign Affairs, where he honed his skills as an effective negotiator, and began building the network of connections with leaders in not just global health but politics as well, which continues to serve him in his current role at WHO.<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">Ghebreyesus thrives on social contact\u2014he regularly posts on social media, sharing personal glimpses of his life with his children and four grandchildren to promote messages about vaccination\u2014and has a unique ability to connect on a personal level, be it with a head of state or a cholera patient. Rather than whisking him away after meetings or even press conferences with journalists, his staff know to cushion his appointments with an additional half an hour or so. He holds weekly open-door sessions and asks all of his executives to do the same so anyone in the organization can bring them complaints, ideas, or problems.<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">That\u2019s what he wishes Trump would have done\u2014talk to him. \u201cIf someone is open to change, you don\u2019t use that as a reason to leave,\u201d he says. \u201cIf that\u2019s your issue, then it\u2019s better to stay and help implement those changes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-center\">***<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">Ghebreyesus does not relish this part of his job\u2014cutting staff to try to make up for lost funds\u2014but it must be done. When staff attempt to make the case for keeping a specific employee, Ghebreyesus stops the discussion, reminding them to focus first on the functions people perform at the organization rather than on individuals. It\u2019s what Ghebreyesus sees as a more \u201chumane\u201d way of reducing staff costs, but the uncertainty still takes a toll. Since the executive order, the lunch crowd at the company cafeteria has thinned out as more people choose to work remotely, and those who are there can\u2019t avoid the anxiety that overshadows their workdays. \u201cThere is a lot of uncertainty, and that\u2019s hard for morale,\u201d\u201d says one employee who has spent more than a decade at WHO working in health workforce deployment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">Ghebreyesus hopes to save some jobs by moving people to regional or country offices, where the cost of living is lower than in Geneva and salary cuts wouldn\u2019t hurt as much. The polio program could move to Cairo, and those working on traditional medicine to India, which has a strong legacy of supporting these practices. (A memo leaked from the U.N. in May proposed a similar move, relocating staff from New York to its offices in Rome or Nairobi.) He\u2019s also hoping that a good number of people might choose to take early retirement. So far, Ghebreyesus has shrunk the number of WHO departments from 76 to 35, and pared program divisions from 10 to four: health promotion, disease prevention, and control; health systems; health emergency preparedness and response; and business operations.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">The change also reflects a resetting of WHO\u2019s activities back to services only it can provide. \u201cWe are happy to give away many of the things we do for other agencies or countries to do, and sunset things,\u201d says Ghebreyesus. Some of this may include programs on chronic diseases like diabetes or obesity; Ministries of Health could oversee those while the WHO would provide the broad guidance and expertise that countries use to build and sustain their own programs. The WHO, for example, reviews new drugs or vaccines to determine their safety and efficacy and issues a pre-qualification that serves as a green light for countries that can\u2019t conduct these reviews themselves. It\u2019s an essential role that helps to distribute new medicines, like the COVID-19 vaccines, more quickly and equitably. \u201cThey are absolutely the only body that can do that effectively,\u201d says Jha.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">As part of the aid worker community that rushes in during health emergencies, Dr. Maria Guevara, international medical secretary at Doctors Without Borders, also hopes to see the WHO strengthen its voice in support of health workers around the world. \u201cWe believe WHO and ministries of health are the guardians of health care and access to health care, and should be the biggest voices for protecting them,\u201d she says. \u201cOne of the things we\u2019ve had deep and confrontational discussion with [the WHO] about is pushing for peace as a right, just as health is a right, and both should be of equal value.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-6 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">While Trump\u2019s method may have been more abrupt and painful than it could have been, Ghebreyesus says he is now focusing on finding common ground. \u201cI appreciate that Trump is Trump,\u201d he says. \u201cHe is open, candid and speaks his mind. World leaders should speak their mind like him; be straight. And I also appreciate his efforts now to address [military] conflicts peacefully. You\u2019ve heard me say many times that peace is the best medicine. He and I agree on that. We have many differences, but we agree on that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"self-baseline font-graphik text-body-large text-black-coffee rich-text mb-0 focus-visible:outline focus-visible:outline-black-coffee focus-visible:outline-2 focus-visible:outline-offset-2 focus-visible:shadow-focus-color text-left\">And he says he is optimistic that the U.S. will return to the WHO. \u201cI still believe in that,\u201d he says. \u201cThere is no reason to stay away, to be honest. No good reason.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Buy a copy of the TIME100 Health issue here Health officials and the public argued that the WHO&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":85685,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4316],"tags":[41251,16991,105,4348,18753,41252,41253,41250,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-85684","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-healthcare","8":"tag-accolades","9":"tag-franchise","10":"tag-health","11":"tag-healthcare","12":"tag-magazine","13":"tag-special-project","14":"tag-sponsorshipblock","15":"tag-time100health2025","16":"tag-uk","17":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114474445944036164","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85684","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85684"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85684\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/85685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85684"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85684"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85684"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}