{"id":883030,"date":"2026-04-09T19:26:27","date_gmt":"2026-04-09T19:26:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/883030\/"},"modified":"2026-04-09T19:26:27","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T19:26:27","slug":"it-shouldnt-take-a-war-for-britain-to-wake-up-to-the-need-for-food-security-tim-lang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/883030\/","title":{"rendered":"It shouldn\u2019t take a war for Britain to wake up to the need for food security | Tim Lang"},"content":{"rendered":"

The British state has form on food security. It ignores it until there\u2019s a crisis \u2013 and then it\u2019s forced to do rapidly what could have been done better, if only food had been taken more seriously in the first place. We\u2019re revisiting this truth today as the food system\u2019s oil dependency is revealed by the US-Israel war on Iran<\/a>. Oil transports the food from farm to fork. It\u2019s turned into the fertilisers that have allowed food production to rise since the second world war. It takes us to the shops (unless we walk or cycle).<\/p>\n

This dependency was also revealed when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, and when oil hit $100 a barrel in 2008, and in the 1970s oil shock. When the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, and the environment secretary, Emma Reynolds, called the big food retailers in last week<\/a>, it showed they were aware of this impact but weren\u2019t prepared for what to do.<\/p>\n

In fact, the UK is awash with scientific and expert advice on what should be done. My report for the National Preparedness Commission, Just in Case, summarised why we should be diversifying supplies, growing more of our own food, coming off the oil-based farming treadmill and engaging the public in protecting itself for coming shocks. Now it emerges that defence analysts have been urging action too.<\/p>\n

So how do we get prepared?<\/p>\n

First, politicians need to get real about food security. The big political worry until recently for ministers has been food price inflation, not whether the food system is itself vulnerable to shocks. They are linked. Inflation hits people on low incomes hardest. But the bigger national food security issue is now critical in terms of consumers\u2019 capacity to spend. Even if the war in the Middle East stops now, the inflationary impact will roll on for months<\/a>. This is because we have built long, complex supply chains that are more vulnerable to disruption by global events.<\/p>\n

What we actually need now is more short, diversified chains, with more incentives to primary producers to grow food domestically. Agriculture today receives only 8.9% of gross value added<\/a> across the agri-food system. The big money is a fight-out between retailers, processors and hospitality.<\/p>\n

Second, we must apply defence-strategy thinking to our understanding of food security. My report showed that all UK retail food goes through only 131 distribution centres. For modern drone warfare, these centres are sitting ducks. We must move rapidly to protect food supply from the hybrid war the government\u2019s national security strategy acknowledged last June<\/a>. Vulnerabilities include climate breakdown, creeping ransomware, cable cutting, drone probes, mass disinformation and choke-point attacks. These all disrupt food supply, which makes our country weak.<\/p>\n

Third, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs must prioritise a push to regionalise food production. The public says it wants more local food, yet it buys globo food<\/a>. It\u2019s time for a reality check: food systems depend on ecosystems. Britain\u2019s favourite fruits<\/a> include strawberries, tangerines and bananas. The latter two cannot grow here, and we depend on oil to transport them. In the UK, strawberries only grow easily for a few months.<\/p>\n

Consumer tastes are out of sync with what can be grown seasonally and in a low-carbon way, and expectations need to readjusted. Across our national diet, we only grow 62% of what we consume<\/a>. We import 83%<\/a> of the dreadfully low amount of fruit we consume. Rebuilding a regional horticulture sector could be the real growth the Treasury wants. When Rachel Reeves promised \u201csecuronomics<\/a>\u201d in the Mais lecture hosted at Bayes Business School in 2024, I thought it might herald food growth. So far, not.<\/p>\n

Fourth, to our shame, one in five people across England, Wales and Northern Ireland<\/a> are already technically food insecure, because they lack consistent access to nutritious food. It would be wise to address this food inequality now, because building social cohesion means we are better prepared when crises hit.<\/p>\n

Fifth, the public must be treated as adults over food security. The government\u2019s Prepare campaign advises people to store some food that does not need cooking, plus some bottles of water. This is poor advice. We need better, more realistic guidance. The scientific advisory committee on nutrition at the Department of Health and Social Care should produce nutrition guidelines for resilience, and help plan what modern food rationing would look like. Don\u2019t be shocked by the word \u201crationing\u201d. Markets ration. They just cannot deal with shocks other than by helping only those with deep pockets.<\/p>\n

Sixth, we need to rethink national and regional storage. We should give new powers to local authorities and mayors to ramp up public engagement and to create new civil food resilience committees to oversee local storage. We should also look to other countries. Switzerland<\/a> stores several months\u2019 worth of main commodities and debates increasing its supplies to last a year<\/a>. Sweden<\/a> has decided to start. China already stockpiles; quite how much is a secret. The Chinese state knows the importance of food<\/a>. India<\/a> has been consolidating its grain stockpile too. Unlike the UK, India\u2019s people have the legal right to food<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Finally, we need vastly more allotments and for gardening organisations to help (re)skill consumers. The Royal Horticultural Society\u2019s (RHS) 2025 State of Gardening<\/a> report found that while 2.5 million people had participated, more than 14 million wanted to. Growing a bit of food for yourself and others is good for collective wellbeing and health. Gardening organisations \u201cget\u201d it but need a new land strategy to deliver. When Dig for Victory, the national campaign to get Britons to grow food during the second world war, was launched, the RHS was asked to help organise it. Today, academics, metro mayors and regional councils should be asked to ascertain what land across the UK could produce diverse food produce and then facilitate growers to get growing.<\/p>\n

From afar, the UK has witnessed how food insecurity becomes a major feature of conflict: from the human-made famine in Gaza, to Russia\u2019s demolition of Ukraine\u2019s food ports, to the use of food blockades in the Sudanese civil war. That insecurity is now reaching these shores, turning what has been an anxiety for British people into a real threat. The urgency of this moment must not be ducked by the government.<\/p>\n