More than 3 million Australians aged over 65 will have to pay hundreds of dollars more for their private health insurance per year, in a move the federal government argues will re-establish fairness between generations.<\/p>\n
In a major pre-budget speech at the National Press Club on Wednesday, Health Minister Mark Butler announced sweeping changes to the National Disability Insurance Scheme<\/a> and aged care.<\/p>\n As part of this, he revealed older Australians would no longer be given special treatment and would now have to pay the same amount for health insurance as younger Australians.<\/p>\n “I understand this won’t be a welcome decision for many, but it’s the right thing to do,”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n he said.<\/p>\n Mr Butler said the current policy was “not fair between generations” and not the best use of taxpayer money, with the decision set to save the government $3 billion over four years, which will be spent on aged care elsewhere.<\/p>\n The government said about 3.2 million older people would now have to pay, on average, between $226 and $255 more a year, with 44,000 older Australians expected to ditch their private health insurance as a result.<\/p>\n Private Healthcare Australia (PHA) chief executive Rachel David said the decision would disappoint older Australians, but she was somewhat subdued in her criticism, acknowledging it would mostly affect wealthier people who were unlikely to stop their cover.<\/p>\n “It will hurt consumers, impact the viability of private hospitals, and limit health funds’ ability to deliver better patient experiences,” Dr David said.<\/p>\n “[But] health funds recognise this group receives significant benefits that could be better targeted elsewhere.<\/p>\n “PHA has previously recommended reducing the rebate for this cohort and redistributing it to lower-income Australians who rely on private health insurance.”<\/p>\n The difference in rebates between generations dates back to 2004 when then-prime minister John Howard made the change while Mr Butler said “government coffers [were] reaping the benefits of the China boom”.<\/p>\n “In 2026, it’s a policy that’s harder to defend,” he added.<\/p>\n