{"id":95000,"date":"2025-05-12T09:37:07","date_gmt":"2025-05-12T09:37:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/95000\/"},"modified":"2025-05-12T09:37:07","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T09:37:07","slug":"food-products-from-animals-with-heritable-genetic-modifications","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/95000\/","title":{"rendered":"Food Products from Animals with Heritable Genetic Modifications"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>GAME CHANGER &#8230;Technology is a potential boon to producers, consumers and animals<\/p>\n<p class=\"entry-meta\">PUBLISHED ON <b>May 11, 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<p>\u201cHeritable Genetic Modification in Food Animals,\u201d a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, was written by a committee of experts, including William Muir, professor emeritus of animal sciences at Purdue University. (Purdue Agricultural Communications)<\/p>\n<p>WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. \u2014 Farmers have been improving the genetics of their animals for thousands of years through selective breeding. Wild boars were bred until they lost their tusks and gained fattier meat. Breeding cattle were chosen for favorable traits like muscularity or high milk production.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, advances in genomics and biotechnology have allowed scientists to make precise changes to animal DNA, creating genetic modifications that can be inherited.<\/p>\n<p>A new report from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalacademies.org\/home\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine<\/a> looks at these new technologies, evaluates potential risks and makes recommendations for the future. The report, \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalacademies.org\/our-work\/heritable-genetic-modification-in-food-animals\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Heritable Genetic Modification in Food Animals<\/a>,\u201d was written by a committee of experts, including William Muir, professor emeritus of animal sciences at Purdue University.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a potential game changer,\u201d Muir said of the new generation of technology.<\/p>\n<p>Technologies that transfer DNA from one animal to another (transgenics) have been used for several decades, but the debut of CRISPR in 2012 brought the science to a new level. CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) is a tool that allows researchers to make precise changes to DNA. These changes can be \u201cknock-ins\u201d \u2014 additions of new alleles for favorable traits \u2014 or \u201cknockouts,\u201d the removal of undesirable alleles. When changes are made to an animal\u2019s germ line, or the cells that develop into sperm and eggs, they are called heritable genetic modifications (HGMs).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe main advance in recent technology is that, with classic transgenics, the genes were inserted at random \u2014 we had no control over where they went, so they could have unknown consequences,\u201d Muir said. \u201cNow, with CRISPR, we can insert new genes in areas exactly where we want them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Though CRISPR-modified plants are now ubiquitous in American agriculture, the introduction of similarly modified animals has been slowed by a complex regulatory process. Only a few genetically modified animals have been FDA approved for human consumption. One is AquAdvantage salmon, an Atlantic salmon engineered to grow much more quickly. The salmon was approved for sale by the FDA in 2015, after years of testing. But its journey to market was hardly smooth \u2014 dubbed \u201cfrankenfish\u201d by opponents, it was subject to mandatory GMO labeling. Though the controversy eventually died down, it likely slowed companies\u2019 eagerness to pursue similar innovations, Muir said.<\/p>\n<p>The only CRISPR-edited animal approved for consumption is a type of beef cattle edited to have short hair, which makes them more heat tolerant. The edited cattle were FDA approved in 2022.<\/p>\n<p>A second CRISPR-modified animal, the GalSafe pig, is close to approval. The CRISPR-modified <a href=\"https:\/\/www.morningagclips.com\/tag\/swine\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pig<\/a> doesn\u2019t produce alpha-galactosides, sugar molecules that can cause allergic reactions in people with alpha-gal syndrome, an acquired meat allergy usually caused by a tick bite. The GalSafe pig originally was bred with the hopes of one day providing organs and tissues for transplantation, since alpha-gal sugars may be a cause of organ rejection.<\/p>\n<p>The benefits of HGMs are not limited to producers and consumers, Muir said. Modifications can also benefit animals. Muir gives the example of laying chickens \u2014 because only females lay eggs, male chicks are culled after birth. The alternative is either raising the male chicks for meat or using technology to determine sex while the chicks are still embryos in the egg (in-ovo sexing). Current in-ovo sexing technologies involve either making a small hole in the egg and testing the fluid or scanning the egg for feather color, which only works in chicken breeds where males and females are different colors.<\/p>\n<p>Gene editing could offer a more efficient solution. Chickens have been modified so that male embryos produce a color marker that can be seen through the eggshell (awaiting approval).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe can pass eggs under a high-speed scanning optical microscope to see if an egg has that color spot, and if it does, we know, OK, it\u2019s male, and we can cull it,\u201d Muir said.<\/p>\n<p>Animals could also be modified to be resistant to diseases, Muir said, which would benefit animals and humans alike. Pigs edited to resist porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome\u00a0(PRRS) are already approved in Brazil and Colombia, and researchers hope they will secure FDA approval for their use in the U.S. this year. PRRS currently costs producers more than half a billion dollars per year, killing nursing piglets and causing reproductive failure in adult females.<\/p>\n<p>The anti-PRRS gene editing is \u201ca tremendous benefit for the swine industry and has no risk to humans,\u201d Muir said.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, chickens could potentially be made resistant to avian influenza, which has cost producers billions of dollars and created fears of a possible human pandemic.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe really want to get birds that have innate resistance so we can get ahead of the disease,\u201d Muir said. \u201cDisease resistance is one of the great opportunities of this technology.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A more streamlined FDA approval process is needed to secure these advances, Muir said. In the current environment, the expense and time needed for approval scares off investors, meaning many potentially beneficial products don\u2019t make it out of the lab.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere needs to be a quicker way of getting these into the market,\u201d Muir said.<\/p>\n<p>To this end, one of the report\u2019s recommendations was for HGM products to be evaluated based on how the product\u2019s phenotype \u2014 its observable characteristics \u2014 compare to existing food products that are known to be safe.<\/p>\n<p>Other recommendations included creating a process to evaluate outcomes of FDA applications, supporting discussions with animal welfare stakeholders and investing in more research to evaluate nutritional composition of HGM foods.<\/p>\n<p>Muir also hopes the report will help consumers understand how carefully and rigorously HGM products are tested for safety.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe want people to know this is a safe technology,\u201d he said. \u201cWe have many, many layers of often-redundant safety measures, so the public should feel very confident that when these edited animals are commercialized, they\u2019ve been very well-vetted.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:right;\">\u2014 Purdue University College of Agriculture<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"GAME CHANGER &#8230;Technology is a potential boon to producers, consumers and animals PUBLISHED ON May 11, 2025 \u201cHeritable&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":95001,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3846],"tags":[267,70,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-95000","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-genetics","8":"tag-genetics","9":"tag-science","10":"tag-uk","11":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114494193181274230","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95000\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/95001"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}