{"id":965492,"date":"2026-05-16T23:46:36","date_gmt":"2026-05-16T23:46:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/965492\/"},"modified":"2026-05-16T23:46:36","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T23:46:36","slug":"blackfriars-cycleway-to-go-ahead-with-floating-bus-stops-southwark-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/965492\/","title":{"rendered":"Blackfriars cycleway to go ahead with floating bus stops \u2013 Southwark News"},"content":{"rendered":"

Work on a new cycleway connecting Aldgate with Blackfriars is to proceed having been paused while further guidance on floating bus stops was published.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The scheme was halted last September after concerns were raised about the risks floating bus stops pose to the visually impaired. The City of London Corporation, which proposed the plans, had agreed to wait until additional guidance was produced by the Department for Transport (DfT) on their use.<\/p>\n

Since its publication in January the scheme has been reviewed against that guidance, with Corporation officers concluding it \u201caligns with best practice and meets required standards, with additional mitigation measures incorporated to address user needs, especially for disabled people\u201d.<\/p>\n

In a report prepared for a Streets and Walkways Sub-Committee meeting on Wednesday (May 13), officers noted the original approval to progress the scheme was granted in October 2024.<\/p>\n

It would run from Aldgate to Blackfriars and included bi-directional protected cycle lanes on Queen Victoria Street between Puddle Dock and Friday Street.<\/p>\n

A public consultation indicated overall support, though concerns were flagged by some groups regarding the proposed floating bus stops.<\/p>\n

Others, such as Wheels for Wellbeing, are recorded as raising in a briefing last June that some people rely on being able to cycle, and that a balance is required to be struck to ensure there are routes that work for everyone.<\/p>\n

Corporation officers reviewed the proposed floating bus stops against the guidance published by Active Travel England (ATE) on behalf of the DfT. They considered the designs \u201cmeet the recommended design process\u201d.<\/p>\n

The officers\u2019 recommendation was to restart the scheme and proceed to detailed design, to be funded by Transport for London (TfL). They wrote if this was not approved, the project would be cancelled with the floating bus stops deemed necessary to completing the cycleway.<\/p>\n

At the sub-committee meeting, Alderwoman Alison Gowman raised concerns about what she described as a \u201cpartial review\u201d, adding she was unsure how the floating bus stops would comply with the updated guidance.<\/p>\n

Alderwoman Gowman continued to note ATE is still to publish further documentation in 2027, making her concerned the Corporation may design a scheme that will soon be out of date. An officer confirmed the design guidance due from ATE next year will not relate to the structure of floating bus stops but will instead concern signage.<\/p>\n

Alderwoman Gowman later asked whether in the redesign officers would be looking at whether the floating bus stops could be excluded entirely from the scheme.<\/p>\n

Bruce McVean, Assistant Director, Policy and Projects, said various options were assessed in preparation of the report. He added: \u201cWe don\u2019t think we can build a meaningful cycleway without bus stop bypasses that meets national and London standards\u2026so I don\u2019t think it would be an effective use of money to build one that doesn\u2019t. <\/p>\n

\u201cSo I think it\u2019s a choice of either going ahead with a cycleway with bus stop bypasses\u2026and if the decision is to go ahead without them then effectively we would end the project at this stage.\u201d<\/p>\n

Members voted in-favour of the recommendation three to five, meaning the project will progress to the design stage.<\/p>\n

After the meeting Sarah Gayton, Street Access Campaign Coordinator at NFBUK (National Federation of the Blind of the UK), said: \u201cThis decision is devastating for blind people. Some that use these stops now will no longer be able to travel into and around the City of London by bus anymore. <\/p>\n

\u201cThe City of London will become inaccessible to blind people for generations to come. The City of London are clearly discriminating against blind people, and they think that is lawful. It is not and it is shocking.\u201d<\/p>\n

A City of London Corporation spokesperson said: \u201cWe are taking the issue of accessibility, for both physically disabled cyclists and the visually impaired, extremely seriously and will ensure the City\u2019s streets are safe and usable for everyone, as is the priority in all of our schemes.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Aldgate to Blackfriars cycleway has been subject to a full Equalities Impact Assessment, with input from a diverse range of charities representing both aforementioned groups. The proposals are also in line with the Department for Transport\u2019s statutory guidance on bus stop bypasses.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will continue to engage constructively with accessibility groups as the designs develop.\u201d<\/p>\n

Also known as bus stop bypasses, floating bus stops are becoming increasingly common across the capital.<\/strong><\/p>\n

They involve installing a cycle lane between a bus stop and the pavement, to allow cyclists to continue riding while passengers board or alight.<\/p>\n

Cycling groups have argued they are key to reducing road danger and improving cycling safety.<\/p>\n

Others, such as the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) and National Federation of the Blind of the UK (NFBUK), have however raised concerns about the danger to people with visual impairments having to cross a cycle path to catch a bus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Work on a new cycleway connecting Aldgate with Blackfriars is to proceed having been paused while further guidance…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":965493,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7757],"tags":[748,393,4884,257,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-965492","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-london","8":"tag-britain","9":"tag-england","10":"tag-great-britain","11":"tag-london","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/116586924429836998","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/965492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=965492"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/965492\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/965493"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=965492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=965492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=965492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}