A US Senate official on Saturday removed security funding that could be used for Donald Trump\u2019s planned $400m White House ballroom from a massive spending package, Democratic lawmakers said, imperiling Republican efforts to devote taxpayer money to the contentious project.<\/p>\n
The decision by the Senate\u2019s parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, deals a blow to Trump and his administration, which has sought the money for security purposes related to the ballroom.<\/p>\n
Trump has said construction of the ballroom will be funded by private donors. But Senate Republicans are seeking $1bn in taxpayer funding to the Secret Service for security upgrades, including the ballroom.<\/p>\n
The parliamentarian interprets Senate rules, including whether legislative provisions are permitted. Trump\u2019s fellow Republicans control the Senate, and they still could revise the legislation to try to gain the parliamentarian\u2019s approval. If they do not succeed, they may be unable to include the ballroom-related funding in a $72bn spending package they plan to bring to a vote on the Senate floor, with passage expected on a party-line vote with Democrats opposed. The bulk of the legislation is devoted to immigration enforcement.<\/p>\n
The Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, took credit for the ruling after Democrats argued to the parliamentarian that the security money doesn\u2019t belong in the bill.<\/p>\n
\u201cRepublicans tried to make taxpayers foot the bill for Trump\u2019s billion-dollar ballroom,\u201d Schumer said on Saturday evening. \u201cSenate Democrats fought back \u2013 and blew up their first attempt.\u201d<\/p>\n
Schumer added that Democrats \u201cwill be ready to stop them again\u201d as Republicans say they will revise the bill.<\/p>\n
Republicans are invoking complex budget rules to secure passage without any Democratic support. Democrats have opposed funding for Trump\u2019s signature immigration crackdown absent reforms they have sought since federal immigration agents killed US citizens in separate incidents in Minnesota in January.<\/p>\n
Republicans hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate, leaving them short of the 60 votes needed to pass most legislation under the chamber\u2019s rules. Democrats have criticized the ballroom as an expensive and frivolous diversion by Trump at a time when Americans face rising costs such as higher fuel prices.<\/p>\n
Trump has written on social media that it will be \u201cthe finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World\u201d.<\/p>\n
Republicans have said the ballroom-related spending they are pursuing is needed to ensure presidential safety, citing an April incident in which a gunman tried to storm a black-tie media gala<\/a> in Washington that Trump attended.<\/p>\n The administration has said the ballroom will modernize infrastructure, bolster security and ease strain on the White House, which often relies on temporary outdoor structures to host large events. Trump has said the ballroom will be completed around September 2028, near the end of his second term in office.<\/p>\n Work continues on the construction of the ballroom at the White House. Photograph: Rod Lamkey\/AP<\/p>\n Democrats, hoping to win control of Congress in November\u2019s midterm elections, are seizing on Republican support of the ballroom to portray Trump\u2019s party as out of touch with the cost-of-living concerns of Americans at a time of rising energy costs driven by the Iran war he launched in February.<\/p>\n Trump last year ordered the demolition of the White House\u2019s East Wing \u2013 originally constructed in 1902 during Teddy Roosevelt\u2019s presidency and expanded four decades later during Franklin Roosevelt\u2019s presidency \u2013 to make way for his ballroom.<\/p>\n The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a nonprofit organization, then filed a lawsuit challenging the project<\/a>, arguing that neither the president nor the National Park Service, which manages the White House grounds, possessed the authority to tear down the historic structure or erect a major new facility without explicit congressional approval.<\/p>\n