In late November 2013 Yanukovych had signaled his willingness to sign an association agreement with the European Union<\/a>. In return, the Europeans demanded that he release opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko<\/a> from prison and initiate constitutional and legal reforms. After a visit with Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin<\/a> in Moscow, Yanukovych opted not to sign the agreement. It seemed that Ukraine would commit itself to the Eurasian Economic Union, a Russian-led EU analogue that would include Kazakhstan<\/a> and Belarus<\/a> as members when it came into existence on January 1, 2015.<\/p>\n Within hours of Yanukovych\u2019s about-face, protesters took to the streets. They were mainly young people, alerted by social networks and text messages, and they soon established a camp on the Maidan. Although the level of daily participation fluctuated over time, every Sunday masses converged on the Maidan; at the action\u2019s peak, 500,000 gathered in central Kyiv. The authorities initially deployed the Berkut riot police without serious confrontations, but on the night of November 30 the order was given to clear the square by force. Dozens were injured in the ultimately ineffective effort, and the protests were reenergized by the assault.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Britannica Quiz<\/p>\n Pick Your Battles Quiz<\/p>\n <\/a> <\/p>\n On December 16 Putin<\/a> offered Ukraine $15 billion in loans and reduced gas prices to offset a shortfall in the country\u2019s finances that had been sparked by the near depletion of its hard currency reserves. The parliament enacted draconian anti-protest laws on January 16, 2014, that limited freedom of speech and assembly, outlawed nongovernmental organizations<\/a> (NGOs), and established a virtual dictatorship under Yanukovych. Though they were repealed only 12 days later, the measures steeled the protesters. In an effort to preserve his rule, Yanukovych removed Prime Minister Mykola Azarov<\/a> and offered government posts to opposition leaders Arseniy Yatsenyuk<\/a> and Vitali Klitschko<\/a>, but both declined.<\/p>\n The government brought gangs of armed men to Kyiv from other cities, principally Kharkiv<\/a> and Donetsk<\/a>. They burned cars, beat protesters, and kidnapped prominent journalists. On the opposition side, local militias formed, based partly on rightist groups such as Right Sector. The average protesters were no longer the 20-something students but more-hardened 30- and 40-year-olds, many from western Ukraine. Pro-Euromaidan activists took over government buildings in Kyiv and throughout Ukraine.<\/p>\n \n Trusted knowledge for those who want to know more.\n <\/p>\n SUBSCRIBE<\/a><\/p>\n On February 18 more than 20 people were killed in clashes with police, but that was merely a hint of what was to come. Two days later the center of Kyiv became a battleground. Government snipers fired on protesters from the roofs of buildings, killing at least 80 and wounding hundreds. Amid the chaos the Maidan protesters held their ground. On February 21 a group of EU foreign ministers arrived in Kyiv to broker a deal between Yanukovych and parliamentary opposition leaders. The parties agreed to form a government of \u201cnational unity\u201d within 10 days, implement constitutional reforms to reduce the powers of the presidency\u2014reinstating the constitution of 2004\u2014and hold new presidential elections by December 31. Yanukovych would remain president until those elections were held. The opposition leaders agreed to the deal, and Putin, in a telephone conversation with U.S. Pres. Barack Obama<\/a>, appeared to support it. The following day, however, Yanukovych fled Kyiv. The parliament responded by stripping him of his office, ordering the release of Tymoshenko from prison, and appointing Oleksandr Turchynov<\/a> acting president. New presidential elections were called for May 25.<\/p>\n On February 27 heavily armed troops\u2014who were dubbed \u201clittle green men\u201d for the lack of insignia on their uniforms\u2014took over the parliament and government buildings in Simferopol<\/a> in the Ukrainian autonomous republic of Crimea<\/a>. After numerous implausible denials by the Kremlin, these gunmen were later confirmed to be Russian personnel. They installed a new prime minister, Sergey Aksyonov<\/a>, whose party had received only about 4 percent of the vote in the most recent elections. Members of the self-declared Crimean militia, backed by 25,000 troops and sailors attached to the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol<\/a>, took over government buildings and military installations, forcing the surprised Ukrainian units to surrender. The covert invasion and illegal annexation of Crimea was given a sheen of legitimacy by a widely criticized referendum on March 16, during which it was reported that more than 95 percent of voters supported joining the Russian Federation.<\/p>\n Vladimir Putin<\/a>On May 9, 2014, Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin addressed a crowd in Sevastopol, Crimea, Ukraine, as part of the festivities celebrating Russia’s widely condemned annexation of the Ukrainian autonomous republic of Crimea.(more)<\/p>\n On April 2 Putin formally revoked the 2010 Kharkiv Accords, suspending the discount on Russian natural gas that Ukraine had received in exchange for basing rights in Crimea. He celebrated Victory Day, a holiday marking the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany<\/a>, with a visit to Sevastopol on May 9. Putin maintained that a pro-Nazi junta had taken power in Ukraine and was targeting Russian speakers. These statements were supported by scant evidence but were nevertheless repeated at length over subsequent years. Propaganda in the Russian media reached absurd heights.<\/p>\n The war in the Donbas The Russian proxy war and the Poroshenko administration <\/p>\n While Russia solidified its hold on Crimea throughout the spring, small groups of armed men took over administrative buildings in the eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk<\/a>, Luhansk<\/a>, and Kharkiv<\/a>. On May 11 separatists held referenda and declared the formation of autonomous \u201cpeople\u2019s republics\u201d in Donetsk (DNR) and Luhansk (LNR), but the separatist movement in Kharkiv largely fizzled. In the Donets Basin (Donbas<\/a>), skirmishes between Russian-backed militias and government forces intensified, and dozens of pro-Russian separatists were killed in a battle over Donetsk\u2019s international airport.<\/p>\n Igor Strelkov<\/a>Pro-Russian separatist leader Igor Girkin (byname Igor Strelkov) holding a media briefing on July 28, 2014, in the rebel stronghold of Donetsk, Ukraine.(more)<\/p>\n On May 25 chocolate magnate Petro Poroshenko<\/a> easily won the Ukrainian presidential election, which took place without the participation of Crimea and much of the Donbas. Poroshenko promised to step up an Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO) to regain the occupied territories. In separatist regions the new governments were taken over by militants, including some from Russia. The most prominent among them was Strelkov, the nom de guerre of Igor Girkin<\/a>, a former colonel with the Russian Federal Security Service<\/a> (FSB), who established his headquarters in Slov\u2019yansk<\/a>. Poroshenko was inaugurated on June 7, and he immediately introduced a proposal to restore peace in separatist-controlled regions. Fighting continued, however, and on June 13 government forces reclaimed the city of Mariupol<\/a>.<\/p>\n Malaysia Airlines flight 17<\/a>Emergency workers examining the charred debris at the crash site of Malaysia Airlines flight 17, near the village of Hrabove, eastern Ukraine, July 20, 2014.(more)<\/p>\n ATO forces liberated Slov\u2019yansk on July 5, but Strelkov and about 8,000 men established a new base in Donetsk. Units under Strelkov\u2019s command were believed to have been responsible for the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17<\/a> near Hrabove on July 17. All 298 people aboard, most of whom were citizens of the Netherlands, were killed. On August 14 Strelkov reportedly resigned his position and left Ukraine. A Dutch inquiry would later determine that the aircraft was shot down by a Russian-made Buk surface-to-air missile system<\/a>, and four individuals\u2014all of whom were associated with the Russian-backed military operation in eastern Ukraine\u2014were identified as suspects. The most prominent among these was Strelkov; in November 2022 a Dutch court found Strelkov and two others guilty of murder.<\/p>\n Vladimir Putin, Alexander Lukashenko, and Petro Poroshenko<\/a>Belarusian Pres. Alexander Lukashenko (center) hosting a meeting between Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin (left) and Ukrainian Pres. Petro Poroshenko (right) in Minsk, Belarus, in an effort to end the fighting in eastern Ukraine, August 26, 2014.(more)<\/p>\n By the end of July, the EU and the U.S. had increased sanctions on Russia, freezing bank accounts and banning travel by prominent officials. In late August regular Russian troops entered Ukraine and surrounded Ukrainian troops at Ilovaisk, where they killed hundreds. In spite of overwhelming evidence of direct Russian participation in the conflict, the Kremlin insisted that it was not intervening in Ukraine. After separatist forces opened a new front that once again threatened the key port city of Mariupol, Poroshenko decided to abandon the ATO operation. On September 5 representatives from Ukraine, Russia, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), and the two breakaway republics met in Minsk<\/a>, Belarus, to conclude a cease-fire agreement.<\/p>\n Snap parliamentary elections held on October 26 bolstered the position of pro-European parties, with Yatsenyuk\u2019s People\u2019s Front and the Poroshenko Bloc winning the most votes. On November 2 the DNR and the LNR held elections for \u201cPeople\u2019s Councils,\u201d and separatist leaders Aleksandr Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky claimed victory.<\/p>\n In spite of repeated violations by both sides, the Minsk protocol remained in place in mid-December. Poroshenko\u2019s government faced the dual task of introducing radical reforms and ending corruption while dealing with an unpredictable adversary in Moscow. Right-wing militants, largely shut out in elections, were prominent in street fighting and in Ukrainian volunteer battalions. An estimated 700,000 refugees had fled from the Donbas to Russia, with thousands more displaced to other areas of Ukraine. By year\u2019s end more than 4,700 people had been killed and more than 10,000 had been wounded in the fighting. As winter fell, indiscriminate artillery fire and limited access to basic services such as heat, water, and electricity led the UN to label the situation for civilians in the DNR and the LNR as \u201cextremely dire.\u201d<\/p>\n Minsk II and the election of Volodymyr Zelensky Ukraine crisis<\/a>World leaders meeting in Minsk, Belarus, to discuss the terms of a cease-fire in the conflict in eastern Ukraine, February 11, 2015: (from left) Belarusian Pres. Alexander Lukashenko, Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French Pres. Fran\u00e7ois Hollande, and Ukrainian Pres. Petro Poroshenko.(more)<\/p>\n On February 12, 2015, the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, France, and Germany agreed on a 12-point peace plan (dubbed Minsk II) that proposed, among other things, the cessation of fighting, the withdrawal of heavy weapons, the release of prisoners, and the removal of foreign troops from Ukrainian territory. The tenuous peace held, and heavy weapons were pulled back by both sides in early September 2015. Frequent violations of the truce left over 9,000 dead and more than 20,000 wounded by year\u2019s end, however. Ukrainian authorities estimated that over 2,000 Russian troops had been killed since the beginning of fighting in April 2014, but Russian officials continued to deny any involvement in the conflict. In May 2015 Putin had signed a decree banning the release of information about the deaths of Russian soldiers during \u201cspecial operations.\u201d In December 2015 Russian hackers cut electricity to some 225,000 people in western Ukraine. Additional cyber attacks<\/a> on Ukraine\u2019s infrastructure would follow as the war in the Donbas settled into a state of frozen conflict for the next six years.<\/p>\n In 2019 Volodymyr Zelensky<\/a> was elected president of Ukraine. In his hit television show Servant of the People<\/a>, the actor and comedian had portrayed an everyman who followed an unlikely path to the presidency. Life would imitate art as Zelensky\u2019s anti-corruption platform earned him widespread support, and he defeated Poroshenko in a landslide. Zelensky pledged to bring the conflict in the Donbas to a close, but his efforts were complicated when he was drawn into a political scandal<\/a> in the United States. The U.S. Congress<\/a> had authorized some $400 million in military aid for Ukraine, but U.S. Pres. Donald Trump<\/a> held up the release of that security assistance. In a phone call with Zelensky on July 25, 2019, Trump implied that the aid would be released only if Zelensky \u201cwould do us a favor\u201d by endorsing a pair of unsubstantiated claims about Trump\u2019s political opponents. Zelensky never provided the \u201cquid pro quo\u201d that Trump had requested, and the funds were finally made available in September 2019. Trump\u2019s attempt to pressure a foreign government for personal political gain led the U.S. House of Representatives<\/a> to launch impeachment<\/a> proceedings against him in December 2019.<\/p>\n In September 2020 Zelensky approved a new national security strategy that unambiguously labeled Russia as an aggressor and identified NATO<\/a> membership as one of Ukraine\u2019s key defense and foreign policy goals. Previous statements from Kyiv had left significant room for negotiation with Moscow, and Zelensky himself had harbored such hopes early in his term. In recognition of Russia\u2019s continued hybrid warfare campaign against Ukraine, the framework called for mediated talks between the two governments rather than any attempts at bilateral engagement.<\/p>\n The Russian invasion of Ukraine The Russian buildup and Putin\u2019s \u201cspecial military operation\u201d <\/p>\n Between October and November 2021, Russia began a massive buildup of troops and military equipment along its border with Ukraine. Over the following months, additional forces were dispatched to Belarus<\/a> (ostensibly for joint exercises with Belarusian personnel), the Russian-backed separatist enclave of Transdniestria<\/a> in Moldova<\/a>, and Russian-occupied Crimea. By February 2022 Western defense analysts estimated that as many as 190,000 Russian troops were encircling Ukraine and warned that a Russian incursion was imminent. Putin dismissed these accusations and claimed that an accompanying Russian naval buildup in the Black Sea was a previously scheduled exercise. While Western leaders consulted with both Zelensky and Putin in an effort to stave off a Russian invasion that appeared inevitable, Putin issued demands that included de facto veto power over NATO<\/a> expansion and the containment of NATO forces to countries that had been members prior to 1997. This would, in effect, remove the NATO security umbrella from eastern and southern Europe as well as the Baltic states<\/a>. These proposals were flatly rejected. British and American intelligence services also took the unprecedented step of \u201cpre-bunking\u201d Russia\u2019s manufactured casus belli<\/a> by revealing classified information about Russia\u2019s intentions.<\/p>\n On February 21, 2022, Putin responded by recognizing the independence of the self-proclaimed people\u2019s republics of Donetsk and Luhansk. Putin ordered Russian troops into Ukrainian territory as \u201cpeacekeepers,\u201d and Russian military activity in the Donbas\u2014ongoing since 2014 but consistently disavowed by the Kremlin\u2014at last became overt. Western leaders, pledging solidarity with Ukraine, responded by levying a raft of sanctions against Russian financial institutions. In the early hours of February 24, Zelensky, speaking in Russian, addressed the Russian people directly, delivering an impassioned plea for peace but vowing that Ukraine would defend itself.<\/p>\n Later that day, at about 6:00 am Moscow time, Putin took to the airwaves to announce the beginning of a \u201cspecial military operation.\u201d Within minutes explosions were heard in major cities across Ukraine, and air raid sirens began to sound in Kyiv. Around the world, leaders condemned the unprovoked attack and promised swift and severe sanctions against Russia. Zelensky declared martial law<\/a> and called for a general mobilization of Ukraine\u2019s military-age population.<\/p>\n The Battle of Kyiv and the initial Russian advance <\/p>\n It seems clear that Putin\u2019s plan had been to seize Kyiv in a matter of days and to install a pro-Moscow government. In the early hours of the invasion, an elite Russian paratrooper unit captured Hostomel Airport, just 6 miles (10 km) northwest of the Ukrainian capital, in an airborne assault. Teams of mercenary assassins from the Kremlin-backed Wagner Group<\/a> were dispatched to Kyiv with orders to eliminate key figures in the Ukrainian government. Despite the obvious personal danger, Zelensky remained in the capital, even going as far as to film himself standing on the street in central Kyiv. When the United States offered to evacuate him from the combat zone, Zelensky reportedly said, \u201cThe fight is here. I need ammunition, not a ride.\u201d<\/p>\n Russia-Ukraine War<\/a>Silhouette of a Ukrainian soldier in Kharkiv after a Russian bombardment, March 30, 2022.(more)<\/p>\n Russian troops in Belarus crossed the Ukrainian border and occupied the Chernobyl<\/a> nuclear plant as part of a general advance on Kyiv along the west bank of the Dnipro (Dnieper)<\/a> River. Russian forces in Crimea pushed north and captured Kherson<\/a> on March 2; it would be the only regional capital taken by the Russians in the initial offensive. Elsewhere, the Russian advance stalled in the face of a determined Ukrainian defense. An attempted Russian encirclement of Kharkiv failed, despite that city\u2019s close proximity (20 miles [32 km]) to the Russian border, and the thrust toward Kyiv collapsed due to stiff Ukrainian resistance and obvious shortcomings in Russia\u2019s logistics<\/a> capabilities.<\/p>\n The refugee crisis and evidence of Russian war crimes <\/p>\n Millions of Ukrainians fled the country as Russia indiscriminately targeted civilian populations with rockets and artillery strikes. On March 16 as many as 600 people were killed in the besieged city of Mariupol<\/a> when a Russian air strike leveled the Donetsk Academic Regional Drama Theater. It was widely known that the building was being used as the city\u2019s main bomb shelter, and the theater\u2019s set designer had painted the word \u201cCHILDREN\u201d on the pavement outside in massive Cyrillic<\/a> letters that were visible even in satellite imagery. By late March some four million Ukrainians had fled the fighting; this represented Europe\u2019s largest refugee<\/a> crisis since World War II. The overwhelming majority would find safety in Poland, Germany, and the Czech Republic.<\/p>\n As the war entered its second month, it was clear that the offensive against Kyiv had grossly miscarried. The Russian paratroopers at Hostomel had been isolated and subjected to furious Ukrainian artillery bombardment, and the Russian troops occupying the Kyiv suburbs of Irpin and Bucha were conducting a horrifying campaign of violence against the civilian populations of those cities. After the Russians were forced to withdraw from Irpin and Bucha, Ukrainian forces uncovered mass graves, bodies that showed clear signs of torture, and other evidence of war crimes<\/a>. Elsewhere along the front, the Russians targeted cultural sites, hospitals, water treatment plants, and other civilian infrastructure in a brazen violation of the Geneva Conventions<\/a>. Looting of civilian homes and businesses was also widespread in areas under Russian occupation.<\/p>\n International support for Ukraine Zelensky appeals to the West, the sinking of the Moskva, and the fall of Mariupol Russia-Ukraine War<\/a>Ukrainian marine Mykhailo Dianov inside the Azovstal steel works in Mariupol, Ukraine.(more)<\/p>\n On paper the Russian military appeared to have an overwhelming advantage in both personnel and mat\u00e9riel, but the West quickly responded to provide Ukraine with billions of dollars in military aid. Zelensky, often appearing in an olive drab T-shirt, appealed to governments and intergovernmental organizations around the world through video calls as he warned that a \u201cnew Iron Curtain<\/a>\u201d was descending on Europe. Ukraine\u2019s military performance was not solely dependent on foreign assistance, however. Many of those defending Ukraine had earned valuable combat experience while serving in the Donbas, where fighting against Russian proxies was ongoing since 2014. In addition, Ukraine\u2019s military underwent extensive reforms in the years since Russia illegally annexed Crimea, and defense spending increased sharply during that time. When he took office, Zelensky had ordered an overhaul of Ukroboronprom, the scandal-plagued state-owned concern that controlled Ukraine\u2019s defense industry, and that restructuring led to renewed confidence in Ukroboronprom and ultimately resulted in strategic partnerships with international firms such as Lockheed Martin<\/a>.<\/p>\n Russia-Ukraine War; Moskva<\/a>The missile cruiser Moskva, the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, entering Sevastopol harbor in 2008. The Moskva was sunk by a Ukrainian missile strike in April 2022.(more)<\/p>\n The rapid advances made by Ukraine\u2019s military-industrial complex<\/a> were perhaps most dramatically displayed on April 13 when the Moskva<\/a>, a Russian guided missile cruiser<\/a> and the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet<\/a>, was struck by a pair of Ukrainian-produced Neptune anti-ship missiles off the coast of Odesa<\/a>. Russian authorities claimed that the ship had suffered an ammunition fire but that it was being towed to port for repairs. When the Moskva sank the following day, it provided an enormous morale boost for Ukraine and further undermined the perception of Russia as a \u201cnear-peer\u201d adversary of the United States. The loss of the Moskva also degraded Russia\u2019s ability to project force in the western Black Sea, as it was the only vessel in the Black Sea Fleet with long-range anti-air defenses.<\/p>\n In May fighting intensified in the Donbas, and Ukraine launched a counteroffensive that pushed back the Russian troops that had been threatening Kharkiv. In the south, however, Mariupol finally surrendered to the Russians after a nearly three-month siege that had reduced the once vibrant port city to ruins. The final holdouts\u2014a mixed force of Ukrainian national guard units and marines\u2014had occupied the massive Azovstal steel plant for more than a month, and the brutal fighting there led observers to recall the Battle of Stalingrad<\/a>. Ukrainian officials estimated that at least 20,000 civilians had been killed in the city and more than 90 percent of Mariupol\u2019s structures had been damaged or destroyed during the siege.<\/p>\n A number of factors would dictate Russia\u2019s reliance on attrition warfare in the Donbas. As demonstrated in the failed Kyiv offensive, Russia could not count on its armored<\/a> units to successfully execute even the basic elements of a maneuver warfare<\/a> campaign. They were overly reliant on roads, they were dependent on Russia\u2019s fragile logistics and supply system for fuel and ammunition, and even Russia\u2019s most advanced tanks proved vulnerable to Ukrainian antitank guided missile<\/a> (ATGM) teams. Despite an overwhelming numerical advantage in aircraft, the Russian air force failed to establish air superiority in any major combat theater. This meant that Russian armor was left vulnerable to Ukraine\u2019s formidable armada of unmanned aerial vehicles<\/a>; these ran the gamut from consumer drones that had been modified to drop small aerial bombs to the formidable Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2. The near-total global embargo on advanced processors<\/a> that was leveled on Russia also ensured that any computerized equipment lost could scarcely be replaced.<\/p>\n The isolation of Russia and the expansion of NATO Russia-Ukraine War; Volodymyr Zelensky<\/a>Ukrainian Pres. Volodymyr Zelensky speaking at a joint press conference in Kyiv with Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki and Latvian Pres. Egils Levits, September 9, 2022.(more)<\/p>\n Putin\u2019s \u201cspecial military operation\u201d against Ukraine had seen the failure of Russia\u2019s main thrust toward Kyiv, the deaths of at least a dozen Russian generals, and the sinking of the Moskva, the largest ship to be lost to enemy action since the Argentine cruiser General Belgrano was torpedoed during the Falkland Islands War<\/a> in 1982. Russia had become the most heavily sanctioned country in history; it was isolated from the international banking system, and the EU, the U.S., the U.K., and Canada had all closed their airspace to Russian traffic. Ukraine, conversely, was embraced by the West as a developing democracy defending itself against the depredations of an autocratic neighbor. Western leaders flocked to Kyiv to demonstrate solidarity with Ukraine and to pledge their continued support.<\/p>\n Russia-Ukraine War; HIMARS<\/a>A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) being offloaded from a C-17 Globemaster at Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, California, January 2022.(more)<\/p>\n In June the U.S. stepped up its military aid by sending an initial shipment of High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) to Ukraine. The HIMARS platform offered greater accuracy and longer range than any comparable weapon in the Russian arsenal, and Ukrainian troops were soon using the systems to strike supply depots and command-and-control centers far behind the front lines. A dozen HIMARS were operational in Ukraine by July, and they would prove crucial in the Ukrainian summer offensive that was to come.<\/p>\n Magdalena Andersson and Sanna Marin<\/a>Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson (center) and Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin (right) at a meeting about NATO membership for their countries, Stockholm, April 13, 2022.(more)<\/p>\n On June 23 Ukraine was granted candidate status, an important first step on the path to membership in the EU. NATO, decried by some as irrelevant in the 21st century, found a renewed purpose and sense of solidarity in the wake of the Russian invasion. Finland<\/a> and Sweden<\/a>, two countries with a long history of neutrality<\/a>, each signaled their intention to join the alliance shortly after the war began. On July 5 both countries signed accession protocols. Instead of shattering the alliance\u2019s will, Putin had, in effect, turned the Baltic Sea into a NATO lake.<\/p>\n Russian disinformation and the meme war Russia-Ukraine War<\/a>Tweet by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense acknowledging the role of NAFO in combating Russian disinformation online. The image depicts a \u201cfella\u201d avatar with a High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) launch in the background.(more)<\/p>\n Russia\u2019s information warfare<\/a> capability had been established long before the initiation of open hostilities in Ukraine. Moscow\u2019s efforts to interfere in the Brexit referendum<\/a>, the 2016 U.S. presidential election<\/a>, and the 2017 French presidential election<\/a> were well documented. The Russian disinformation<\/a> campaign against Ukraine was farcical on its face, however, and it gained little traction outside Russian state media. Putin attempted to portray Russia\u2019s aggression as an effort to \u201cde-Nazify\u201d a country whose democratically elected leader was Jewish and had lost relatives in the Holocaust<\/a>. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov sparked a diplomatic row with Israel when he tried to support Putin\u2019s assertion. After repeating a discredited claim that \u201cHitler<\/a> also had Jewish blood,\u201d Lavrov said, \u201cWise Jewish people say that the most ardent anti-Semites<\/a> are usually Jews.\u201d<\/p>\n The Internet Research Agency, a Kremlin-backed \u201ctroll farm\u201d that was linked to oligarch<\/a> Yevgeny Prigozhin<\/a>, struggled to spread Moscow\u2019s narrative more broadly. Pro-Russian messages\u2014even those from official Russian government accounts\u2014were met with a torrent of derisive replies from the North Atlantic Fellas Association (NAFO), a loosely organized collective of pro-Ukrainian posters with cartoon Shiba Inu<\/a> avatars. \u201cFellas\u201d were ubiquitous on Twitter<\/a>, and their meme<\/a> campaign against Russian disinformation was startlingly successful. Government and military officials in Ukraine and the United States were among those who voiced their support for the group by adopting \u201cfella\u201d avatars, as did Kaja Kallas, the prime minister of Estonia<\/a>. NAFO members also donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Ukrainian defense forces and charities.<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tQuick Facts<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDate: \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(Show\u00a0more)<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t Show More<\/p>\n \t\t Russia-Ukraine War<\/a>A Ukrainian soldier photographing \u201cSaint Javelin,\u201d a mural depicting a Madonna holding a Javelin antitank guided missile, May 25, 2022, in Kyiv.(more)<\/p>\n These charitable efforts led NAFO to partner with Saint Javelin, a meme-based fundraising operation launched by Canadian journalist Christian Borys. Borys created Saint Javelin\u2014a stylized Orthodox<\/a> Madonna<\/a> holding a Javelin antitank guided missile<\/a>\u2014and printed them on stickers in an effort to raise $500 for humanitarian aid in Ukraine. In what was perhaps the first military conflict to weaponize memes, Saint Javelin represented a powerful asset for the Ukrainian side. Borys\u2019s operation dramatically expanded to a full clothing shop, with items depicting \u201csaints\u201d wielding a variety of Western weapons, and his contribution to Ukraine soon topped $1 million.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The toppling of the Yanukovych government and the invasion of Crimea From November 2013 to late February 2014,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2722,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[1407,1406,1405,1404,6],"class_list":["post-2721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","tag-article","tag-britannica","tag-encyclopeadia","tag-encyclopedia","tag-russia-ukraine-war"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2721\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"Civil](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/civil-war-cannon-overlooks-keneesaw-mountain-national-battle.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Penguin,](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/inline-left.webp\")
<\/p>\n![\"shohei](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/inline-right.webp\")
<\/p>\n![\"Mobile\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ukraine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/inline-mobile.webp\")
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFebruary 2014 – present <\/p>\n