Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).
Ridoutt, B., Anastasiou, K., Baird, D., Garcia, J. N. & Hendrie, G. Cropland footprints of Australian dietary choices. Nutrients 12, 1212 (2020).
Springmann, M. et al. Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e451–e461 (2018).
Cambeses-Franco, C., González-García, S., Feijoo, G. & Moreira, M. T. Is the Paleo diet safe for health and the environment? Sci. Total Environ. 781, 146717 (2021).
Cambeses-Franco, C., González-García, S., Feijoo, G. & Moreira, M. T. Encompassing health and nutrition with the adherence to the environmentally sustainable new Nordic diet in southern Europe. J. Cleaner Prod. 327, 129470 (2021).
Chen, C., Chaudhary, A. & Mathys, A. Dietary change scenarios and implications for environmental, nutrition, human health and economic dimensions of food sustainability. Nutrients 11, E856 (2019).
Drew, J., Cleghorn, C., Macmillin, A. & Mizdrak, A. Healthy and climate-friendly eating patterns in the New Zealand context. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 017007 (2020).
Fresán, U., Martínez-González, M. A., Sabaté, J. & Bes-Rastrollo, M. Global sustainability (health, environment and monetary costs) of three dietary patterns: results from a Spanish cohort (the SUN project). BMJ Open 9, e021541 (2019).
Springmann, M., Clark, M. A., Rayner, M., Scarborough, P. & Webb, P. The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e797–e807 (2021).
Webb, P. et al. Measurement of diets that are healthy, environmentally sustainable, affordable, and equitable: a scoping review of metrics, findings, and research gaps. Front. Nutr. 10, 1125955 (2023).
Blackstone, N. T. et al. Diets cannot be sustainable without ensuring the well-being of communities, workers and animals in food value chains. Nat. Food 5, 818–824 (2024).
Davis, B. et al. Estimating Global and Country-level Employment in Agrifood Systems FAO Statistics Working Paper Series 23–34 (FAO, 2023).
CO29 – Forced Labour Convention, 1930 No. 29 (ILO, 1932).
The Meanings of Forced Labour (ILO, 2014); https://www.ilo.org/resource/article/meanings-forced-labour
Global Estimates of Modern Slavery: Forced Labour and Forced Marriage (ILO, Walk Free Foundation & International Organization for Migration, 2022); https://publications.iom.int/books/global-estimates-modern-slavery-forced-labour-and-forced-marriage
Minkoff-Zern, L.-A. Hunger amidst plenty: farmworker food insecurity and coping strategies in California. Local Environ. 19, 204–219 (2014).
Minkoff-Zern, L.-A. & Sloat, S. A new era of civil rights? Latino immigrant farmers and exclusion at the United States Department of Agriculture. Agric. Hum. Values 34, 631–643 (2017).
Grzywacz, J. G. et al. Organization of work in the agricultural, forestry, and fishing sector in the US southeast: implications for immigrant workers’ occupational safety and health. Am. J. Ind. Med. 56, 925–939 (2013).
Soper, R. How wage structure and crop size negatively impact farmworker livelihoods in monocrop organic production: interviews with strawberry harvesters in California. Agric. Hum. Values 37, 325–336 (2020).
Blackstone, N. T., Norris, C. B., Robbins, T., Jackson, B. & Decker Sparks, J. L. Risk of forced labour embedded in the US fruit and vegetable supply. Nat. Food 2, 692–699 (2021).
Blackstone N. T. et al. Supplementary Information for: forced labor risk is pervasive in the US land-based food supply. Harvard Dataverse https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LEVNP2 (2023).
Blackstone, N. T. et al. Forced labour risk is pervasive in the US land-based food supply. Nat. Food 4, 596–606 (2023).
Reinhardt, S. L. et al. Systematic review of dietary patterns and sustainability in the United States. Adv. Nutr. 11, 1016–1031 (2020).
Serra-Majem, L. et al. Updating the Mediterranean diet pyramid towards sustainability: focus on environmental concerns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 8758 (2020).
Beal, T., Ortenzi, F. & Fanzo, J. Estimated micronutrient shortfalls of the EAT–Lancet planetary health diet. Lancet Planet. Health 7, e233–e237 (2023).
LeBaron, G., Howard, N., Thibos, C. & Kyritsis, P. Confronting Root Causes: Forced Labour in Global Supply Chains (openDemocracy and the Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute, 2018); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35522.68807
Viederman, D. Urgent Action Against Forced Labour Is Possible. Here’s How (World Economic Forum, 2025).
US Tariffs: What’s the Impact on Global Trade and the Economy? (J.P. Morgan Research, 2025).
Lawreniuk, S. Trump’s tariffs: poor workers in countries like Cambodia will be among the biggest losers. Conversation (25 April 2025).
Emediegwu, L. Why Donald Trump’s trade tariffs are a threat to global food security. Conversation (1 May 2025).
Huizar, M. I., Arena, R. & Laddu, D. R. The global food syndemic: the impact of food insecurity, malnutrition and obesity on the healthspan amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 64, 105–107 (2021).
Waxman, E., Salas, J., Gupta, P. & Karpman, M. Food Insecurity Trended Upward in Midst of High Inflation and Fewer Supports: Findings from the Health Reform Monitoring Survey, June 2022 (Urban Institute, 2022).
Haeder, S. Massive cuts to Health and Human Services’ workforce signal a dramatic shift in US health policy. Conversation (31 March 2025).
De la Vega-Rivera, A. & Merino-Pérez, L. Socio-environmental impacts of the avocado boom in the Meseta Purépecha, Michoacán, Mexico. Sustainability 13, 7247 (2021).
Dehghan, S. K. Are Mexican avocados the world’s new conflict commodity? Guardian (30 December 2019).
Denvir, A., Arima, E. Y., González-Rodríguez, A. & Young, K. R. Ecological and human dimensions of avocado expansion in México: towards supply-chain sustainability. Ambio 51, 152–166 (2022).
Khan, N., Kakabadse, N. K. – & Skouloudis, A. Socio-ecological resilience and environmental sustainability: case of avocado from Mexico. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 28, 744–758 (2021).
Magrach, A. & Sanz, M. J. Environmental and social consequences of the increase in the demand for ‘superfoods’ world-wide. People Nat. 2, 267–278 (2020).
Conrad, Z. et al. Diet sustainability analyses can be improved with updates to the food commodity intake database. Front. Nutr. 9, 868485 (2022).
Jarmul, S. et al. Climate change mitigation through dietary change: a systematic review of empirical and modelling studies on the environmental footprints and health effects of ‘sustainable diets’. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 123014 (2020).
LeBaron, G. The role of supply chains in the global business of forced labour. J. Supply Chain Manage. 57, 29–42 (2021).
Billings, K. C. USDA’s Latest Update to Nutrition Standards for School Meals (Library of Congress, 2024); https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47522
Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs (USDA Food and Nutrition Service, 2012).
C40 Food Systems wins the Food Planet Prize 2024, the $2-million environmental award, for making millions of meals in major cities healthier and more sustainable. Food Planet Prize https://foodplanetprize.org/news/c40-food-systems-wins-the-food-planet-prize-the-2-million-environmental-award-for-making-millions-of-meals-in-major-cities-healthier-and-more-sustainable/ (2024).
U.S. Government Trade Strategy to Combat Forced Labor: Making Trade a Force for Good by Addressing Forced Labor in Global Supply Chains (Office of the United States Trade Representative, 2025); https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/U.S.%20Government%20Trade%20Strategy%20to%20Combat%20Forced%20Labor.pdf
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework (United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner, 2011); https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf
Chambers, R. & Birchall, D. How European human rights law will reshape U.S. business. UC Law Bus. J. 20, 57 (2024).
Wilks, S., Blankenbach, J. & Manschot, A. Respecting Human Rights: Why the CSDDD Needs to Go Beyond Social Auditing (Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, 2023).
Decker Sparks, J. L., Matthews, L., Cárdenas, D. & Williams, C. Worker-less social responsibility: how the proliferation of voluntary labour governance tools in seafood marginalise the workers they claim to protect. Mar. Policy 139, 105044 (2022).
Fair Food Program. Fair Food Program https://www.fairfoodprogram.org/ (2025).
Costa, D. & Martin, P. How much would it cost consumers to give farmworkers a significant raise? Economic Policy Institute: Working Economics Blog https://www.epi.org/blog/how-much-would-it-cost-consumers-to-give-farmworkers-a-significant-raise-a-40-increase-in-pay-would-cost-just-25-per-household/ (2020).
Acting against Forced Labour: An Assessment of Investment Requirements and Economic Benefits: Discussion Paper on the Economics of Forced Labour (ILO, 2024); https://doi.org/10.54394/TYLO1243
The Hands That Feed Us: Challenges and Opportunities for Workers Along the Food Chain (Food Chain Workers Alliance, 2012); https://foodchainworkers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Hands-That-Feed-Us-Report.pdf
The hands that feed us. Nat. Food 1, 93 (2020).
2022 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor (US Department of Labor, 2022); https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ilab/child_labor_reports/tda2021/2022-tvpra-list-of-goods-v3.pdf
Human Rights Report: 2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (US Department of State, 2023); https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/
Trafficking in Persons Report (US Department of State, 2023); https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
Bouwman, A. F. et al. Global hindcasts and future projections of coastal nitrogen and phosphorus loads due to shellfish and seaweed aquaculture. Rev. Fish. Sci. 19, 331–357 (2011).
Gephart, J. A. et al. Environmental performance of blue foods. Nature 597, 360–365 (2021).
MacLeod, M. J., Hasan, M. R., Robb, D. H. F. & Mamun-Ur-Rashid, M. Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from global aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 10, 11679 (2020).
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire (CDC & NCHS, 2015).
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire (CDC & NCHS, 2017).
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025 9th edn (USDA & DHHS, 2020); https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/resources/2020-2025-dietary-guidelines-online-materials
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (USDA & HHS, 2020); https://doi.org/10.52570/DGAC2020
Nissen, S. E. U.S. dietary guidelines: an evidence-free zone. Ann. Intern. Med. 164, 558–559 (2016).
Knuppel, A., Papier, K., Key, T. J. & Travis, R. C. EAT-Lancet score and major health outcomes: the EPIC-Oxford study. Lancet 394, 213–214 (2019).
Hu, E. A., Steffen, L. M., Coresh, J., Appel, L. J. & Rebholz, C. M. Adherence to the healthy eating index–2015 and other dietary patterns may reduce risk of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. J. Nutr. 150, 312–321 (2020).
Blackstone, N. T. & Conrad, Z. Comparing the recommended eating patterns of the EAT-Lancet Commission and eietary guidelines for Americans: implications for sustainable nutrition. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 4, nzaa015 (2020).
Conrad, Z., Reinhardt, S., Boehm, R. & McDowell, A. Higher-diet quality is associated with higher diet costs when eating at home and away from home: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2016. Public Health Nutr. 24, 5047–5057 (2021).
Conrad, Z. et al. Relationship between food waste, diet quality, and environmental sustainability. PLoS ONE 13, e0195405 (2018).
Conrad, Z. Daily cost of consumer food wasted, inedible, and consumed in the United States, 2001–2016. Nutr. J. 19, 35 (2020).
Conrad, Z. Food Commodity Intake Database, updated to 2018 (v3). DANS Data Station Life Sciences https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-zqx-a23v (2022).
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Appendix E-2.7: Major Categories and Subcategories Used in the DGAC Analyses of WWEIA Food Categories – Part E. Section 2. Supplementary Documentation to the 2015 DGAC Report (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, 2015).
USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies 2017-2018 (USDA Agricultural Research Service, 2020).
National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS): Codebook: Food-at-Home (FAH) Nutrient Data, faps_fahnutrients (USDA Economic Research Service, 2016).
Food Services Research Group Food Intakes Converted to Retail Commodities Databases (FICRCD) (Food Surveys Research Group Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, 2018); https://hdl.handle.net/10113/AA7842
Technical Conversion Factors for Agricultural Commodities (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2003).
USDA’s Conversion Factors and Weights and Measures for Agricultural Commodities and Their Products (USDA Economic Research Service, 1992).
Haytowitz, D. B. et al. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Legacy Release (Nutrient Data Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, ARS, USDA, 2019); https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1529216
Love, D. C. et al. Food sources and expenditures for seafood in the United States. Nutrients 12, 1810 (2020).
Bell, B. M. brookembell/forced-labor: release of Version 1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16815633 (2025).