• Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, Y. et al. Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morvan, A. et al. Phase transitions in random circuit sampling. Nature 634, 328–333 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M. & Cleland, A. N. Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Krinner, S. et al. Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems. EPJ Quantum Technol. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1090.0342 (2018).

  • Yoo, J. et al. 34.2 A 28-nm bulk-CMOS IC for full control of a superconducting quantum processor unit-cell. In Proc. 2023 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference (ISSCC) 506–508 (IEEE, 2023).

  • Chakraborty, S. et al. A cryo-CMOS low-power semi-autonomous transmon qubit state controller in 14-nm FinFET technology. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 57, 3258–3273 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McDermott, R. et al. Quantum-classical interface based on single flux quantum digital logic. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 024004 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Polonsky, S. V. et al. New RSFQ circuits (Josephson junction digital devices). IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 3, 2566–2577 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McDermott, R. & Vavilov, M. G. Accurate qubit control with single flux quantum pulses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2, 014007 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McKay, D. C., Wood, C. J., Sheldon, S., Chow, J. M. & Gambetta, J. M. Efficient Z gates for quantum computing. Phys. Rev. A 96, 022330 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leonard, E. et al. Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014009 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, C. H. et al. Single flux quantum-based digital control of superconducting qubits in a multichip module. PRX Quantum 4, 030310 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Somoroff, A. et al. Fluxonium qubits in a flip-chip package. Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 024015 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Castellanos-Beltran, M. A. et al. Coherence-limited digital control of a superconducting qubit using a Josephson pulse generator at 3 K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 192602 (2023).

  • Magesan, E. et al. Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 080505 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liebermann, P. J. & Wilhelm, F. K. Optimal qubit control using single-flux quantum pulses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 024022 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, K., McDermott, R. & Vavilov, M. G. Hardware-efficient qubit control with single-flux-quantum pulse sequences. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 014044 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, K. et al. Single-flux-quantum-based qubit control with tunable driving strength. Chin. Phys. B 32, 128501 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shillito, R., Hopfmueller, F., Kulchytskyy, B. & Ronagh, P. Compact pulse schedules for high-fidelity single-flux quantum qubit control. Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 014038 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vozhakov, V., Bastrakova, M., Klenov, N., Satanin, A. & Soloviev, I. Speeding up qubit control with bipolar single-flux-quantum pulse sequences. Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 035024 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Catelani, G., Schoelkopf, R. J., Devoret, M. H. & Glazman, L. I. Relaxation and frequency shifts induced by quasiparticles in superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. B 84, 064517 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, K. et al. Quasiparticle dynamics in superconducting quantum-classical hybrid circuits. Phys. Rev. B 108, 064512 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gustavsson, S. et al. Suppressing relaxation in superconducting qubits by quasiparticle pumping. Science 354, 1573–1577 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iaia, V. et al. Phonon downconversion to suppress correlated errors in superconducting qubits. Nat. Commun. 13, 6425 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McEwen, M. et al. Resisting high-energy impact events through gap engineering in superconducting qubit arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 240601 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, C. H. et al. Quasiparticle poisoning of superconducting qubits from resonant absorption of pair-breaking photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 017001 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kosen, S. et al. Signal crosstalk in a flip-chip quantum processor. PRX Quantum 5, 030350 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levine, H. et al. Demonstrating a long-coherence dual-rail erasure qubit using tunable transmons. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011051 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, G. et al. Estimating the coherence of noise in quantum control of a solid-state qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 260501 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirichenko, A. F. et al. System and method of flux bias for superconducting quantum circuits. US patent 12,087,503 В2 (2024).

  • Acharya, R. et al. Multiplexed superconducting qubit control at millikelvin temperatures with a low-power cryo-CMOS multiplexer. Nat. Electron. 6, 900–909 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Likharev, K. K. & Semenov, V. K. RSFQ logic/memory family: a new Josephson-junction technology for sub-terahertz-clock-frequency digital systems. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 1, 3–28 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirichenko, D. E., Sarwana, S. & Kirichenko, A. F. Zero static power dissipation biasing of RSFQ circuits. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21, 776–779 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaplan, S. B. & Mukhanov, O. A. Operation of a superconductive demultiplexer using rapid single flux quantum (RSFQ) technology. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 5, 2853–2856 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chip Foundry. SEEQC https://seeqc.com/foundry-services (2026).

  • Johansson, J. R., Nation, P. D. & Nori, F. QuTiP 2: a Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234–1240 (2013).

  • Pedersen, L. H., Møller, N. M. & Mølmer, K. Fidelity of quantum operations. Phys. Lett. A 367, 47–51 (2007).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wood, C. J. & Gambetta, J. M. Quantification and characterization of leakage errors. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032306 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar