• Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073–1078 (1996).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–964 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation. Nat. Phys. 8, 264–266 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernien, H. et al. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature 551, 579 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaufman, A. et al. Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system. Science 353, 794–800 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zu, C. et al. Emergent hydrodynamics in a strongly interacting dipolar spin ensemble. Nature 597, 45–50 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davis, E. et al. Probing many-body dynamics in a two-dimensional dipolar spin ensemble. Nat. Phys. 19, 836–844 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Semeghini, G. et al. Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator. Science 374, 1242–1247 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kyprianidis, A. et al. Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal. Science 372, 1192–1196 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J. & Zewail, A. H. Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Park, S. T., Lin, M. & Zewail, A. H. Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM): theoretical and experimental. New J. Phys. 12, 123028 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • García de Abajo, F. J., Asenjo-Garcia, A. & Kociak, M. Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields. Nano Lett. 10, 1859–1863 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feist, A. et al. Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kfir, O. Entanglements of electrons and cavity photons in the strong-coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103602 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feist, A. et al. Cavity-mediated electron–photon pairs. Science 377, 777–780 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dahan, R. et al. Imprinting the quantum statistics of photons on free electrons. Science 373, eabj7128 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haindl, R. et al. Coulomb-correlated electron number states in a transmission electron microscope beam. Nat. Phys. 19, 1410–1417 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meier, S., Heimerl, J. & Hommelhoff, P. Few-electron correlations after ultrafast photoemission from nanometric needle tips. Nat. Phys. 19, 1402–1409 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuttruff, J., Nabben, D., Zimmermann, A. C., Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Terahertz control and timing correlations in a transmission electron microscope. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl6543 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuttruff, J., Holder, J., Meng, Y. & Baum, P. Real-time electron clustering in an event-driven hybrid pixel detector. Ultramicroscopy 255, 113864 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koll, L. M., Maikowski, L., Drescher, L., Witting, T. & Vrakking, M. J. J. Experimental control of quantum-mechanical entanglement in an attosecond pump–probe experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 043201 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laurell, H. et al. Measuring the quantum state of photoelectrons. Nat. Photonics 19, 352–357 (2025).

  • Akoury, D. et al. The simplest double slit: interference and entanglement in double photoionization of H2. Science 318, 949–952 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henke, J., Jeng, H., Sivis, M. & Ropers, C. Observation of quantum entanglement between free electrons and photons. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13047 (2025).

  • Preimesberger, A., Bogdanov, S., Bicket, I., Rembold, P. & Haslinger, P. Experimental verification of electron–photon entanglement. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13163 (2025).

  • Okamoto, H. Possible use of a Cooper-pair box for low-dose electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. A 85, 043810 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karnieli, A., Rivera, N., Arie, A. & Kaminer, I. Superradiance and subradiance due to quantum interference of entangled free electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060403 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feist, A. & Bach, N. Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy using a laser-driven field emitter: femtosecond resolution with a high coherence electron beam. Ultramicroscopy 176, 63–73 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schattschneider, P., Löffler, S., Gollisch, H. & Feder, R. Entanglement and entropy in electron–electron scattering. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 241, 146810 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Priebe, K. et al. Attosecond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Photonics 11, 793–797 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Omar, Y., Paunković, N., Sheridan, L. & Bose, S. Quantum walk on a line with two entangled particles. Phys. Rev. A 74, 042304 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsarev, M., Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Measurement of temporal coherence of free electrons by time-domain electron interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 165501 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Banaszek, K., D’Ariano, G. M., Paris, M. G. A. & Sacchi, M. F. Maximum-likelihood estimation of the density matrix. Phys. Rev. A 61, 010304 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smolin, J. A., Gambetta, J. M. & Smith, G. Efficient method for computing the maximum-likelihood quantum state from measurements with additive Gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070502 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hradil, Z. Quantum-state estimation. Phys. Rev. A 55, 1561 (1997).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giulini, D. et al. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, 2014).

  • Zurek, W. H. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715–775 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schlosshauer, M. Quantum decoherence. Phys. Rep. 831, 1–57 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nabben, D., Kuttruff, J., Stolz, L., Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Attosecond electron microscopy of sub-cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wöste, A. et al. Ultrafast coupling of optical near fields to low-energy electrons probed in a point-projection microscope. Nano Lett. 23, 5528–5534 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsarev, M., Thurner, J. W. & Baum, P. Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free-electron matter waves. Nat. Phys. 19, 1350–1354 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kruit, P. et al. Designs for a quantum electron microscope. Ultramicroscopy 164, 31–45 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koppell, S., Israel, Y., Bowman, A., Klopfer, B. & Kasevich, M. Transmission electron microscopy at the quantum limit. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 190502 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, S. et al. Electron ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 114801 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rotunno, E. et al. One-dimensional “ghost imaging” in electron microscopy of inelastically scattered electrons. ACS Photonics 10, 1708–1725 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kazenwadel, D., Holder, J., Kuttruff, J. & Baum, P. Energy offset between femtosecond and thermal electrons in nanometer field-emitter tips. Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 024021 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jeltes, T. et al. Comparison of the Hanbury Brown–Twiss effect for bosons and fermions. Nature 445, 402–405 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Claessens, B. J., van der Geer, S. B., Taban, G., Vredenbregt, E. J. D. & Luiten, O. J. Ultracold electron source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 164801 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haindl, R., Di Giulio, V., Feist, A. & Ropers, C. Femtosecond and attosecond phase-space correlations in few-particle photoelectron pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 165002 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuwahara, M. et al. The Boersch effect in a picosecond pulsed electron beam emitted from a semiconductor photocathode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 013108 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boersch, H. Experimentelle Bestimmung der Energieverteilung in thermisch ausgelösten Elektronenstrahlen. Z. Phys. 139, 115–146 (1954).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, K. et al. Coherent interaction between free electrons and a photonic cavity. Nature 582, 50–54 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Życzkowski, K., Horodecki, P., Sanpera, A. & Lewenstein, M. Volume of the set of separable states. Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vidal, G. & Werner, R. F. Computable measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tziperman, O. Figure data and code: two-electron quantum walks for probing entanglement and decoherence in an electron microscope. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18762359 (2026).