• Ryan-Anderson, C. et al. Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. X 11, 041058 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Egan, L. et al. Fault-tolerant control of an error-corrected qubit. Nature 598, 281–286 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gupta, R. S. et al. Encoding a magic state with beyond break-even fidelity. Nature 625, 259–263 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ryan-Anderson, C. et al. High-fidelity teleportation of a logical qubit using transversal gates and lattice surgery. Science 385, 1327–1331 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bluvstein, D. et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626, 58–65 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paetznick, A. et al. Demonstration of logical qubits and repeated error correction with better-than-physical error rates. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02280 (2024).

  • Reichardt, B. W. et al. Logical computation demonstrated with a neutral atom quantum processor. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11822 (2024).

  • Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638, 920–926 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bravyi, S. et al. High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory. Nature 627, 778–782 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, H. et al. Low-overhead transversal fault tolerance for universal quantum computation. Nature 646, 303–308 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gidney, C., Shutty, N. & Jones, C. Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17595 (2024).

  • Gidney, C. & Fowler, A. G. Efficient magic state factories with a catalyzed |CCZ〉 to 2|T〉 transformation. Quantum 3, 135 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bauer, B., Bravyi, S., Motta, M. & Chan, G. K.-L. Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science. Chem. Rev. 120, 12685–12717 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Caesura, A. et al. Faster quantum chemistry simulations on a quantum computer with improved tensor factorization and active volume compilation. PRX Quantum 6, 030337 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aliferis, P. & Preskill, J. Fault-tolerant quantum computation against biased noise. Phys. Rev. A 78, 052331 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bonilla Ataides, J. P., Tuckett, D. K., Bartlett, S. D., Flammia, S. T. & Brown, B. J. The XZZX surface code. Nat. Commun. 12, 2172 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Puri, S. et al. Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay5901 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Réglade, U. et al. Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds. Nature 629, 778–783 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Putterman, H. et al. Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits. Nature 638, 927–934 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grassl, M., Beth, T. & Pellizzari, T. Codes for the quantum erasure channel. Phys. Rev. A 56, 33–38 (1997).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P. & Smolin, J. A. Capacities of quantum erasure channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3217–3220 (1997).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Campbell, W. C. Certified quantum gates. Phys. Rev. A 102, 022426 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, Y., Kolkowitz, S., Puri, S. & Thompson, J. D. Erasure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth Rydberg atom arrays. Nat. Commun. 13, 4657 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kubica, A. et al. Erasure qubits: overcoming the T1 limit in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041022 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Barrett, S. D. & Stace, T. M. Fault tolerant quantum computation with very high threshold for loss errors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200502 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sahay, K., Jin, J., Claes, J., Thompson, J. D. & Puri, S. High-threshold codes for neutral-atom qubits with biased erasure errors. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041013 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Baranes, G. et al. Leveraging qubit loss detection in fault-tolerant quantum algorithms. Phys. Rev. X 16, 011002 (2026).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, C.-C. et al. Taming Rydberg decay with measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 160601 (2026).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, S. et al. High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit. Nature 622, 279–284 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scholl, P. et al. Erasure conversion in a high-fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator. Nature 622, 273–278 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levine, H. et al. Demonstrating a long-coherence dual-rail erasure qubit using tunable transmons. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011051 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chou, K. S. et al. A superconducting dual-rail cavity qubit with erasure-detected logical measurements. Nat. Phys. 20, 1454–1460 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi, X. et al. Long-lived metastable-qubit memory. Phys. Rev. A 111, L020601 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, W., Sun, X., Zhang, J. et al. Logical multi-qubit entanglement with dual-rail superconducting qubits. Nat. Phys. 22, 591–597 (2026).

  • Radnaev, A. et al. Universal neutral-atom quantum computer with individual optical addressing and nondestructive readout. PRX Quantum 6, 030334 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Muniz, J. A. et al. High-fidelity universal gates in the 171Yb ground-state nuclear-spin qubit. PRX Quantum 6, 020334 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jandura, S., Thompson, J. D. & Pupillo, G. Optimizing Rydberg gates for logical-qubit performance. PRX Quantum 4, 020336 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fromonteil, C., Bluvstein, D. & Pichler, H. Protocols for Rydberg entangling gates featuring robustness against quasistatic errors. PRX Quantum 4, 020335 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stefanazzi, L. et al. The QICK (Quantum Instrumentation Control Kit): readout and control for qubits and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 044709 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peper, M. et al. Spectroscopy and modeling of 171Yb Rydberg states for high-fidelity two-qubit gates. Phys. Rev. X 15, 011009 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Beugnon, J. et al. Two-dimensional transport and transfer of a single atomic qubit in optical tweezers. Nat. Phys. 3, 696–699 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bluvstein, D. et al. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature 604, 451–456 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Manetsch, H. J. et al. A tweezer array with 6,100 highly coherent atomic qubits. Nature 647, 60–67 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, S. et al. Universal gate operations on nuclear spin qubits in an optical tweezer array of 171Yb atoms. Phys. Rev. X 12, 021028 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jenkins, A., Lis, J. W., Senoo, A., McGrew, W. F. & Kaufman, A. M. Ytterbium nuclear-spin qubits in an optical tweezer array. Phys. Rev. X 12, 021027 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Barnes, K. et al. Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits. Nat. Commun. 13, 2779 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lis, J. W. et al. Midcircuit operations using the omg architecture in neutral atom arrays. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041035 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Porsev, S. G., Derevianko, A. & Fortson, E. N. Possibility of an optical clock using the 61S0→63P0o transition in 171,173Yb atoms held in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. A 69, 021403 (2004).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thompson, J. D., Tiecke, T. G., Zibrov, A. S., Vuletić, V. & Lukin, M. D. Coherence and Raman sideband cooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 133001 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levine, H. et al. Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170503 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jandura, S. & Pupillo, G. Time-optimal two- and three-qubit gates for Rydberg atoms. Quantum 6, 712 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Evered, S. J. et al. High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer. Nature 622, 268–272 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Linke, N. M. et al. Fault-tolerant quantum error detection. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701074 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Andersen, C. K. et al. Repeated quantum error detection in a surface code. Nat. Phys. 16, 875–880 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chou, K. S. et al. Deterministic teleportation of a quantum gate between two logical qubits. Nature 561, 368–373 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Erhard, A. et al. Entangling logical qubits with lattice surgery. Nature 589, 220–224 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Postler, L. et al. Demonstration of fault-tolerant universal quantum gate operations. Nature 605, 675–680 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knill, E. Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices. Nature 434, 39–44 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bartolucci, S. et al. Fusion-based quantum computation. Nat. Commun. 14, 912 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paesani, S. & Brown, B. J. High-threshold quantum computing by fusing one-dimensional cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 120603 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aliferis, P. & Terhal, B. M. Fault-tolerant quantum computation for local leakage faults. Quantum Info. Comput. 7, 139–156 (2007).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Norcia, M. et al. Midcircuit qubit measurement and rearrangement in a 171Yb atomic array. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041034 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chow, M. N. H. et al. Circuit-based leakage-to-erasure conversion in a neutral-atom quantum processor. PRX Quantum 5, 040343 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Y., Bao, Y., Peper, M., Li, C. & Thompson, J. D. Fast, continuous and coherent atom replacement in a neutral atom qubit array. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15633 (2025).

  • Gu, S., Vaknin, Y., Retzker, A. & Kubica, A. Optimizing quantum error-correction protocols with erasure qubits. PRX Quantum 6, 040354 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, K. et al. Surface code with imperfect erasure checks. PRX Quantum 6, 040355 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perrin, H., Jandura, S. & Pupillo, G. Quantum error correction resilient against atom loss. Quantum 9, 1884 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, K., Anand, S., Pocklington, A., Kemp, J. T. & Bernien, H. Dual-element, two-dimensional atom array with continuous-mode operation. Phys. Rev. X 12, 011040 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Muniz, J. A. et al. Repeated ancilla reuse for logical computation on a neutral atom quantum computer. Phys. Rev. X 15, 041040 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Senoo, A. et al. High-fidelity entanglement and coherent multi-qubit mapping in an atom array. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13632 (2025).

  • Bluvstein, D. et al. A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantum computation. Nature 649, 39–46 (2026).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsai, R. B.-S., Sun, X., Shaw, A. L., Finkelstein, R. & Endres, M. Benchmarking and fidelity response theory of high-fidelity Rydberg entangling gates. PRX Quantum 6, 010331 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rower, D. A. et al. Suppressing counter-rotating errors for fast single-qubit gates with fluxonium. PRX Quantum 5, 040342 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flash, T. & Hogan, N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J. Neurosci. 5, 1688–1703 (1985).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Young, A. W. et al. Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock. Nature 588, 408–413 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dickson, L. D. Optical considerations for an acoustooptic deflector. Appl. Opt. 11, 2196–2202 (1972).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuhr, S. et al. Analysis of dephasing mechanisms in a standing-wave dipole trap. Phys. Rev. A 72, 023406 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tomita, T. et al. Atom camera: super-resolution scanning microscope of a light pattern with a single ultracold atom. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03241 (2024).

  • Tiecke, T. G. et al. Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom. Nature 508, 241–244 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, B. et al. Dataset for ‘Logical qubits with erasure conversion using metastable neutral atoms’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19491381 (2026).