Watch video: Understanding the Journey to Full Employment
I would first like to pay respect to the traditional and original owners of this land, the Gadigal people
of the Eora Nation, to pay respect to those who have passed before us and to acknowledge todays
custodians of this land. I also extend that respect to any First Nations people joining us here today.
Today Id like to talk about the labour market. Employment is crucial to our living standards and our
lives. A job is not just a source of income. For many of us it is also a key part of our identity and way of
life. Those that experience a period of unemployment can suffer for a long time afterwards, and the
economy can lose their skills and expertise.
The Reserve Bank Board has historically set monetary policy to achieve both low and stable inflation and
full employment. Our full employment mandate became more explicit in the updated Statement on the
Conduct of Monetary Policy that was agreed between the Reserve Bank Board and the Treasurer
late last year.
This morning Id like to unpack our view of the labour market – how weve interpreted
recent data, and what we expect over the next couple of years. But first I want to outline what we mean
by and how we assess full employment. Then Ill follow with our assessment of labour market dynamics
– whether we think theyve changed, and where weve been somewhat surprised recently.
Finally, Ill wrap up by talking about our outlook and the risks and uncertainties were
closely monitoring.
What do we mean by full employment?
First, lets start with our definition of full employment. Then Ill unpack some of the
complexities around how we measure and evaluate it over time.
We define full employment as the maximum level of employment that is consistent with low and stable
inflation. When the economy is at full employment, demand and
supply in the labour market are in balance. In turn, this leads to wages growing at a rate consistent
with achieving the inflation target, after accounting for growth in productivity. In the medium term,
this coincides with a balance between demand and supply in the markets for goods and services. And over
time, the absolute level of full employment will typically rise, underpinned by growth in the working-age
population.
Our full employment objective is easy to describe, but it is difficult to measure or capture in a single
metric. So, it may not be a surprise that we use a range of methods and indicators to understand how the
current state of the labour market compares to full employment, and to understand how much uncertainty
there is around our assessment.
While the unemployment rate is a key metric in our analysis, we consider a range of different measures to
holistically assess the labour market. These include leading indicators such as firms employment
intentions, measures of unmet demand such as vacancies, and other cyclical measures of underutilisation
such as the medium-term and youth unemployment rates, and the underemployment rate (Graph 1).
Graph 1
The RBA also uses a suite of models to estimate the unemployment rate and hours-based underutilisation
rate (a broader measure of spare capacity which captures the shortfall in hours worked from unemployment
and underemployment) that would be consistent with full employment. These models use wages growth and
inflation to provide us with information on the balance between demand and supply in the labour market
and in the economy. If inflationary pressures appear persistent, it may suggest that there remains excess
demand in the economy and labour market. Deviations of the actual unemployment and hours-based
underutilisation rates from these estimates – namely the unemployment and underutilisation gaps
– provide yet another metric of the degree of tightness in the labour market.
I want to draw out another critical point. The level of full employment can change over time as the
structure of the economy and labour market evolve. The maximum number of employed people that is
consistent with the RBA achieving its price stability mandate will increase as the population grows or if
the labour force participation rate rises (Graph 2). So, it is also useful to monitor trends in the
employment-to-population ratio and the participation rate.
Graph 2
So what does all this mean for our current assessment of the labour market? Taking into account the
methods and indicators that Ive just taken you through, our current assessment is that the labour
market is operating above full employment but has moved towards better balance since late 2022.
In the context of the first graph that I showed, we can see that a range of labour market indicators have
eased since late 2022, at which time many of these indicators suggested conditions were very tight. Our
models also suggest that the unemployment and underutilisation gaps have narrowed over this period, which
also points to a labour market that is moving towards full employment. This assessment is based on what
we know now. And from here, the return to full employment could play out in many ways. This will be
determined by developments across the economy and in the labour market. So monitoring these developments
is a crucial part of how we assess the overall outlook.
Underlying dynamics of the labour market
As many of you will know, when the economy begins to soften, the first thing firms generally do is to pull
back on unmet demand for workers. That is, they recruit less intensely and put out fewer new job adverts,
and cancel pre-existing vacancies. A softening of the labour market through this channel is not captured
in data series such as the level of employment or the unemployment rate. Overall demand for labour can be
falling even when employment is rising.
During the current cycle, we first observed declines in both job vacancies and measures of employment
intentions from business surveys and the RBAs liaison program in 2022. At the time, conditions were
very tight and there were many vacant positions. As momentum in demand started to moderate, firms
responded to the slowing in momentum by withdrawing positions or posting fewer vacancies. The vacancy
rate has subsequently fallen since mid-2022 but remains above its pre-pandemic level.
To date, the decline in vacancies has coincided with only a modest increase in the unemployment rate. The
typically inverse relationship between vacancies and unemployment is what economists call the
Beveridge curve. The economy appears to have been operating on the steeper portion of the
curve of late, where a fall in vacancies can occur without a large increase in unemployment
(Graph 3). We also cant see clear evidence that the curve permanently shifted over the
pandemic years. For example, if the curve had shifted out, this would suggest that matching workers to
jobs had become harder, which could be because firms are demanding new or different skills, or because
workers werent able to move to the sectors or regions where there are job openings.
Our current assessment, however, is that this hasnt happened. In other words, we think the labour
market today is operating broadly the way it did prior to the pandemic.
Graph 3
While we have not seen a sharp lift in the unemployment rate, the decline in demand for labour and
firms hiring intentions has translated into a lower rate of new hiring and slower employment
growth. We can see this in the rate at which jobseekers have been able to find work. The job-finding rate
rose to multi-decade highs in 2022 before falling back, though it remains well above its 2010s average
(Graph 4). This observation is consistent with people taking a bit longer to find work if they are
looking for it. All else equal, this dynamic contributes to a higher unemployment rate.
Graph 4
Firms also respond to slowing growth in demand by reducing the hours of their existing workforce. We know
this is easier for some roles and sectors than others. We may therefore observe a reduction in average
hours worked per employee.
Average hours worked did decline over much of 2023. But the level of average hours worked has not fallen
materially since late last year and looking through the volatility weve seen this year, has
remained broadly steady since (Graph 5). The data also highlight the volatility weve seen in
average hours worked over the past four years or so, and understanding how it might evolve from here is a
key uncertainty in our forecasts.
Similar to average hours, other measures of labour underutilisation have also not increased noticeably in
recent months. As an example, the underemployment rate, which captures workers who would like to work
more hours, rose in 2023 but has been relatively steady since earlier in the year.
The limited signs of further easing in the latest observations for variables such as average hours worked
and the underemployment rate at a time when economic growth has continued to slow is somewhat surprising
and is a key uncertainty in the outlook. However, taken together, they suggest that conditions in the
labour market remain tighter than implied by full employment.
Graph 5
In a downturn, particularly in a more severe downturn, firms may also turn to layoffs to reduce labour
costs. This would further raise the unemployment rate. Past downturns tell us that firms resist laying
off staff, if possible, as they try to avoid the costs associated with rehiring and reskilling workers as
the economic outlook improves.
The layoffs rate has been trending up recently, but it remains very low by historical standards
(Graph 6). Our assessment is that this is consistent with the labour market loosening from very
tight conditions, but it is still operating above full employment. Changes to the layoffs rate is another
key metric we monitor.
Graph 6
Conditions in the labour market are also typically reflected in the pace of wages growth, and tightness in
the labour market has contributed to strength in wages growth in recent years. More recently, there are
some signs that the easing in the labour market since late 2022 has started to flow through to wage
outcomes for workers. Nominal wages growth appears to have passed its peak and has moderated since late
last year, though wages growth remains solid (Graph 7). Having said that, real wages, which matter
more for households, have been weaker, reinforcing the costs of high inflation.
Moreover, growth of labour costs, as measured by growth of labour costs per unit of output, has also
declined (in part due to an improvement in productivity outcomes).
Graph 7
The recent easing in historical context
Its important to put the recent easing into the context of historical episodes, so we can better
forecast how the labour market is likely to evolve from here. Overall, our current assessment is that the
recent easing in labour market conditions has, to date, been similar to mild downturns in Australian
history (Graph 8).
Excluding the pandemic period, downturns in economic activity and their associated impacts on labour
market outcomes were larger in the early 1980s and 1990s compared to downturns in the 2000s and 2010s.
This is shown by the magnitude of declines in total hours worked which accounts for both changes in
employment and average hours worked.
Graph 8
In the current episode, the decline in total hours worked has come from reductions in average hours worked
rather than declines in employment, repeating the pattern seen in the most recent episodes. A likely
explanation for this is that more recent downturns have been smaller in magnitude, but it may also partly
reflect increased flexibility in the labour market. This has allowed firms to contain labour costs while
retaining employees, and avoid the costs associated with layoffs and rehiring. It has
also meant fewer layoffs and smaller increases in the unemployment rate, which has kept more workers in
jobs.
With the recent adjustment in total hours arising via average hours worked, total employment has continued
to increase, notwithstanding the unemployment rate rising from late 2022 onwards. Aggregate employment
growth has been supported by the rebound in migration since late 2021, which has contributed to both an
increase in the supply and demand for labour.
Employment growth has also been uneven across sectors, with aggregate employment supported by strong
growth in the health, education and public administration sectors. Importantly, the labour market appears
to be doing a good job of facilitating this flow of workers to these industries. Our
preliminary analysis of the healthcare sector, for example, suggests that it has drawn significantly from
those who were outside the labour force or unemployed, while also bringing in some people previously
employed in other industries.
What has been surprising?
I dont want to create an impression that we know everything about the labour market, particularly
about how it will evolve from here.
Its true that recent unemployment rate outcomes have not been unusual given the historical
relationship between changes in the unemployment rate and GDP growth rates (Graph 9).
Graph 9
What has been more surprising is the strength in the labour force participation rate and, as discussed
earlier, the limited easing more recently in some measures such as the underemployment rate and average
hours worked. This is occurring against a backdrop of slow momentum in the economy, a decline in
vacancies and a gradually rising unemployment rate.
The participation rate has continued to trend upwards, reaching a record high in July. This has not been
the experience in most other peer economies (Graph 10). Whereas participation rates amongst this
group have largely begun to stabilise, in Australia the participation rate has continued to increase
steadily in the post-pandemic period.
Graph 10
While the slowing in the economy may have weighed on the participation rate (all other things equal),
other factors have likely provided support, including the longer-run trend towards greater female
participation. We have also seen the share of employed people with multiple jobs continue to trend
upwards since the pandemic, notwithstanding the decline in the latest quarterly data (Graph 11).
Graph 11
So where to from here?
To sum up, conditions in the labour market have eased since late 2022, but our assessment is that the
labour market is still tight relative to full employment.
We expect the demand for labour to grow at a slower pace relative to the supply of labour in the coming
quarters, gradually bringing the labour market into better balance. Our view is that some of this slowing
in labour demand is likely to occur via a decline in average hours (Graph 12).
We also expect employment to continue to increase, but at a slower pace than population growth. In this
view of the outlook, measures of underutilisation – including the unemployment rate – are
expected to continue rising gradually from here, before stabilising as the pace of growth in GDP picks up
to be broadly consistent with the economys underlying trend pace of growth.
Graph 12
As my colleague Andrew Hauser recently pointed out, the outlook is highly uncertain, and we should be
humble about our ability to predict the future. If we can be confident about anything, its that our
forecasts will be wrong at least in some way. We therefore spend a lot of time thinking about how and why
we could be wrong, including by considering scenarios where the economy evolves differently to our base
case forecast and by continuously updating our assessment of risks as economic conditions change. This is
particularly important given that changes in economic conditions can take time to flow through to changes
in labour market conditions.
Its possible that employment growth slows, and the unemployment rate rises more quickly than we
expect. As previously noted, various leading indicators, such as vacancies, are continuing to ease,
suggesting further softening in the labour market from here. Our view is that further falls in vacancies
can still occur alongside a relatively modest increase in the unemployment rate. Compared to other
economies that have seen larger increases in their unemployment rates, the Australian economy has a
higher ratio of vacancies to unemployment, relative to historical experience, which suggests that there
is space for vacancies to fall further without a sharp increase in the unemployment rate (Graph 13).
Graph 13
This outcome is consistent with our assessment that we are still on the steeper part of the Beveridge
curve that I showed earlier. But the slope of the Beveridge curve is highly uncertain, and our view could
easily be wrong.
Our central forecast is also predicated on the assessment that few firms are operating with excess labour
– engaging in so-called labour hoarding. If it turns out that more firms are currently
hoarding labour, then we may expect to see a larger pick-up in the unemployment rate as firms reduce
headcount to cut costs given the backdrop of weak growth in demand. The implications of this alternative
were explored in a scenario in the RBAs August Statement on Monetary Policy.
It is also possible that our assessment is wrong in the other direction. Conditions may be tighter than we
expect, or demand for labour could grow more strongly than we anticipate.
Forecasting the labour market is a difficult but important challenge. Our current assessment is that
labour market dynamics havent fundamentally changed, although we have been surprised by some of the
recent data. While our forecasts will almost certainly be wrong in some way, we remain humble about our
ability to predict the future, and we continue to update our views based on the incoming data and our
ongoing analysis.