Dallas City Council is poised to initiate the process of scouting for a new home while leaving the door open to a potential retention of the iconic Brutalist structure at 1500 Marilla St.
On Wednesday, council members will consider a resolution directing City Manager Kimberly Tolbert to evaluate options for relocating City Hall operations and compare the costs of repairing the existing building versus leasing, buying, or constructing new digs for staff. The resolution also instructs Tolbert to study redevelopment options for the site that could complement the new convention center and stimulate economic activity downtown.
If adopted, the city manager will have to report back the findings to the Finance Committee no later than February 2026.
The proposed resolution follows a flurry of activity around the issue, with multiple committee meetings and a pro-preservation speak-out event held this past week. Much of the debate has been over the potential cost of rehabilitating City Hall after decades of deferred maintenance, which staff pegged at between $152 million and more than $350 million. Critics have claimed the figures are exaggerated, noting a comprehensive condition assessment hasn’t been conducted.
“We’re very comfortable with the estimates that we were given that we provided,” said Assistant City Manager Donzell Gipson, who clarified to council members over the course of two meetings how staff relied on recent vendor quotes, inflation-adjusted quotes from 5-10 years ago, and their own experience working on city facilities.
He stressed how the range was so big because of all the unknowns without a structural assessment. Parking garage repairs had the largest range (between $25 million and $145 million). Staff had two structural engineers do separate visual surveys of the garage. They confirmed the estimate.
Donzell Gipson
“We just want to be very gentle about rolling a number out, especially if we go to the voters in a bond proposition and say we only need $100 million and then come back to find out that we needed $200 million or some other number in excess of that,” Gipson said.
On the subject of bonds, any serious commitment to restoring the building to full working order would have to come from voters given the city’s budgeting constraints. Staff were grilled, particularly by Council Member Paul Ridley (District 14), over how they allowed things to get to this point. While various city councils failed to put any meaningful investments into bond packages across multiple elections, a good chunk of what money was passed remains unused. Staff cited competing city priorities for delays to City Hall projects.
“So staff did not think it was a high priority, put City Hall on the back burner, and now they’re bringing those deficiencies forward to justify doing away with City Hall,” Ridley said.
Even still, it seems like a majority of council members on the Finance Committee and Economic Development Committee might be interested in at least exploring the possibility of offloading the decades-old I.M. Pei and finding new office space downtown. There was some talk about the kinds of amenities staff and visitors could enjoy (within a restored 1500 Marilla St. or without), and the notion of invigorating the site with revenue-generating development was raised by multiple officials.
“Downtown is at a turning point, huge opportunities before us,” Council Member Jesse Moreno (District 2) said. “We now have over 20,000 residents living in downtown. That activation is so critical. We want to make sure that the synergy that we have in the northern and central part of downtown comes to the south side of downtown, the area that I represent, into the Cedars and naturally flowing deeper and deeper into South Dallas and southern Dallas. We got to grow our tax base.”
While it seems there will be quite a lot of work done to assess the costs and opportunities associated with ditching 1500 Marilla St., it’s unclear how accurate a price tag will be affixed to City Hall’s restoration.
The resolution council members will consider on Wednesday directs Tolbert to “Leverage external expertise, pursuant to applicable laws, to review deferred maintenance costs determined by staff.”
In a follow-up memo to the week’s meetings, Gipson noted that there is “no current budget allocation” for “comprehensive condition assessments and formal reports to verify assumptions and determine the full extent and severity of structural conditions” for the parking garage.
While the current crossroads are decades in the making, the recent urgency and consternation surrounding the issue stem from Mayor Eric Johnson charging the new Finance Committee with identifying the most fiscally responsible course of action to address the building’s deferred maintenance.
“The building has some serious issues, and if those numbers are correct, that’s something we really have to think about,” Johnson said about relocating in an interview with CBS 11. “We can’t just take off the table the possibility of moving from City Hall because a famous architect designed the building.”
Still, preservationists and other proponents of keeping city operations at 1500 Marilla St. don’t intend to let a relocation go down without a fight. A petition is gearing up, outside media attention is catching, and some upset residents are already starting to turn out to city meetings.