• Tian, J. et al. The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10562-z (2026).

  • Lai, J. et al. Terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from plant carbonyl sulfide uptake. Nature 634, 855–861 (2024).

  • Keenan, T. F. et al. Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 407–415 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wehr, R. et al. Seasonality of temperate forest photosynthesis and daytime respiration. Nature 534, 680–683 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, Y. et al. Improved estimate of global gross primary production for reproducing its long-term variation, 1982–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2725–2746 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang-Zheng, H. et al. Contrasting carbon cycle along tropical forest aridity gradients in West Africa and Amazonia. Nat. Commun. 15, 3158 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schimel, D. et al. Observing terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle from space. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 1762–1776 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baldocchi, D., Chu, H. &Reichstein, M. Inter-annual variability of net and gross ecosystem carbon fluxes: a review. Agric. For. Meteorol. 249, 520–533 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pastorello, G. et al. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci. Data 7, 225 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2470–2475 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maseyk, K. et al. Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9064–9069 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, W., Maseyk, K., Lett, C. & Seibt, U. Stomatal control of leaf fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and CO2 in a Typha freshwater marsh. Biogeosciences 15, 3277–3291 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wehr, R. et al. Dynamics of canopy stomatal conductance, transpiration, and evaporation in a temperate deciduous forest, validated by carbonyl sulfide uptake. Biogeosci. Discuss. 14, 389–401 (2016).

  • Yang, F., Qubaja, R., Tatarinov, F., Rotenberg, E. & Yakir, D. Assessing canopy performance using carbonyl sulfide measurements. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 3486–3498 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berkelhammer, M. et al. Constraining surface carbon fluxes using in situ measurements of carbonyl sulfide and carbon dioxide. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 28, 161–179 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Commane, R. et al. Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14162–14167 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, W., Berry, J. A., Yakir, D. & Seibt, U. Leaf relative uptake of carbonyl sulfide to CO2 seen through the lens of stomatal conductance-photosynthesis coupling. N. Phytol. 235, 1729–1742 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Welp, L. R. et al. Interannual variability in the oxygen isotopes of atmospheric CO2 driven by El Niño. Nature 477, 579–582 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jian, J. et al. Historically inconsistent productivity and respiration fluxes in the global terrestrial carbon cycle. Nat. Commun. 13, 1733 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar