{"id":1002012,"date":"2026-08-15T08:27:20","date_gmt":"2026-08-15T08:27:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/1002012\/"},"modified":"2026-08-15T08:27:20","modified_gmt":"2026-08-15T08:27:20","slug":"trump-administration-wins-transgender-medical-records-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/1002012\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump administration wins\u00a0transgender medical records case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img alt=\"The Trump administration\u2019s attempts to block transgender care for young people\u00a0has led to protests like this one in February in Washington.\" loading=\"eager\" fetchpriority=\"high\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-gray200 mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration\u2019s attempts to block transgender care for young people\u00a0has led to protests like this one in February in Washington.<\/p>\n<p>Heather Diehl\/Getty Images<\/p>\n<p>In a case that could extend the Trump administration\u2019s war against\u00a0transgender care to states like California where the medical treatment is legal, a federal appeals court ruled Friday that the Justice Department can order a clinic to release records of doctors who provide gender-affirming care and patients who receive it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe President may have moral and political objections to gender-affirming care, wish to end it, and take steps to achieve that goal consistent with law,\u201d the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2026\/08\/14\/25-7384.pdf\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">in a 2-1 ruling<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>While states regulate the practice of medicine within their borders, Judge Carlos\u00a0Bea said in the majority opinion that a state \u201ccannot shield a resident company from having to comply with federal law.\u201d And in this case, Bea said, President Donald Trump\u2019s Justice Department was conducting \u201can ongoing investigation into potential violations of federal health care laws.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>The Justice Department has ordered\u00a0QueerDoc, a small telehealth clinic for transgender youths in Washington state, to turn over records identifying its doctors and patients, including the patients\u2019 addresses and parents or guardians, and the medication they have received.<\/p>\n<p>The ruling doesn\u2019t necessarily require\u00a0QueerDoc to release all its records. While the court overturned a decision by U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead that the Justice Department lacked authority to demand the records, the appeals court majority said Whitehead could still consider restrictions on the government\u2019s access to protect patients\u2019 privacy.<\/p>\n<p>Although \u201cthe administration\u2019s hostility to\u00a0transgender medical care is disturbing, today\u2019s decision doesn\u2019t mean that the courts can\u2019t act to protect patients and providers,\u201d said Christopher Stoll, an attorney with the National Center for LGBTQ Rights in San Francisco.<\/p>\n<p>But the case has a potential impact beyond the geographic boundaries of last year\u2019s Supreme Court ruling\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/politics\/article\/supreme-court-backs-trump-transgender-ruling-20383447.php\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">upholding laws in Tennessee <\/a>and 26 other states that do not allow minors to be given puberty blockers and hormone treatment that support their transgender identity.<\/p>\n<p>That ruling did not directly affect other states, like California, which allow gender-affirming care and have become a source of medication and treatment for youths from other states. Friday\u2019s appeals court ruling, if it stands, would apply to California, which is part of the 9th Circuit, and it could extend nationwide if the case reaches the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration \u201cseeks to intimidate medical providers from offering critical, medically necessary health care to transgender youth,\u201d lawyers for California, 19 other states and the District of Columbia told the appeals court in a January filing by Washington Attorney General Nicholas Brown. \u201cThese laws are necessary to protect the health and well-being of our communities and to uphold the rights and dignity of our transgender residents.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Bea, an appointee of President George W. Bush, was joined in Friday\u2019s ruling by Judge Daniel Bress, appointed by Trump. In dissent, Judge Richard Paez, appointed by President Bill Clinton, said the government was conducting a sham investigation into alleged violations of federal law.<\/p>\n<p>There was strong evidence supporting Whitehead\u2019s conclusion, when he rejected the Justice Department\u2019s subpoena demanding information from\u00a0QueerDoc, that it was a \u201cpretext for its real goal of eliminating gender-affirming care,\u201d Paez wrote.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDisclosure of patients\u2019 names and personally identifying information intimidates current patients and deters prospective patients from seeking care. Patients may choose to forgo care rather than risk public intolerance, hostility, or violence.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>But the court majority said the clinic might be violating the law \u2013 by misbranding its drugs, for example, or illegally prescribing them \u2013 and there was no evidence that the government was acting in bad faith or concealing its motives for seeking the records.<\/p>\n<p>Trump, Bea wrote, clearly has the power to direct his Justice Department \u201cto exercise its statutory authority in a manner that aligns with his broader policy goals.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Trump administration\u2019s attempts to block transgender care for young people\u00a0has led to protests like this one in&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1002013,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[35],"tags":[210,1141,1142,23378,80,19746,4352,67,132,68,324557,7866],"class_list":["post-1002012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health-care","tag-health","tag-health-care","tag-healthcare","tag-medical-care","tag-politics","tag-transgender","tag-trump-administration","tag-united-states","tag-unitedstates","tag-us","tag-us-and-world","tag-youths"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1002012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1002012"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1002012\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1002013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1002012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1002012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1002012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}