{"id":105554,"date":"2025-07-30T19:08:14","date_gmt":"2025-07-30T19:08:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/105554\/"},"modified":"2025-07-30T19:08:14","modified_gmt":"2025-07-30T19:08:14","slug":"ford-government-to-appeal-court-ruling-which-deemed-bike-lane-removal-unconstitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/105554\/","title":{"rendered":"Ford government to appeal court ruling which deemed bike lane removal unconstitutional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/globalnews.ca\/tag\/ford-government\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ford government<\/a> says it will appeal a court ruling which found its plan to tear out dedicated <a href=\"https:\/\/globalnews.ca\/tag\/bike-lanes\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">bike lanes<\/a> in Toronto is unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/70c8fc80.png\" alt=\"\" style=\"position:absolute;width:1px;height:1px\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer-when-downgrade\"\/><\/p>\n<p>On Wednesday afternoon, a government spokesperson confirmed they would be appealing the ruling \u2014 handed down earlier in the day \u2014 which said removing bike lanes from Bloor Street, Yonge Street and University Avenue would \u201cbreach\u201d the Charter.<\/p>\n<p>In his ruling, Superior Court Justice Paul Schabas said the province\u2019s move to take out bike lanes would be \u201cinconsistent\u201d with the constitutional protection of life, liberty and security.<\/p>\n<p>The ruling said an updated version of the law, passed in June and requiring bike lane reconfiguration instead of removal, would also breach the charter.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAny steps taken to \u2018reconfigure\u2019 the target bike lanes that removes their protected character for the purpose of installing a lane for motor vehicles in order to reduce congestion, would be in breach of s. 7 of the Charter,\u201d\u00a0the ruling said.<\/p>\n<p>Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<p>The Ministry of Transportation said the Ford government would appeal.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe were elected by the people of Ontario with a clear mandate to restore lanes of traffic and get drivers moving by moving bike lanes off of major roads to secondary roads,\u201d they said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo deliver on that mandate, we will be appealing the court\u2019s decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\tMonths of bike lane battles\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>The ruling comes after months of legal wrangling and a court-imposed injunction that has, so far, prevented the province from following through on its promise to remove bike lanes from Toronto\u2019s Bloor Street West, Yonge Street and University Avenue.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"170\" height=\"225\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/national.jpg\" alt=\"Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\tGet daily National news<\/p>\n<p>Get the day&#8217;s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/globalnews.ca\/news\/11143723\/ontario-bike-lane-removal-injunction-granted\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">an earlier injunction ruling<\/a>, Justice Schabas cited the public interest in protecting cyclist safety and a lack of evidence backing the government\u2019s claim that removing the lanes would reduce congestion.<\/p>\n<p>Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<p>The original legislation \u2014 Bill 212 \u2014 was fast-tracked through the Ontario legislature in late 2024.<\/p>\n<p>It gave the province the power to assess cities\u2019 plans to install bike lanes moving forward and review infrastructure that had been added in the past half-decade.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\tRelated News\n\t<\/p>\n<ul class=\"l-inlineStories__posts c-posts c-posts--inline \">\n<li class=\"c-posts__item\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/globalnews.ca\/news\/11281690\/ontario-bike-lanes-appeal-dismissed\/\" class=\"c-posts__inner\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"c-posts__thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/654bba09d2b979957fac523a8868a7b387237b4a8559418534735d71f9e25ed6.jpg\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"336\" height=\"224\" alt=\"\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\t\t\tCourt dismisses Ontario\u2019s bid to appeal bike lane injunction\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>It allowed Ontario to reverse the installation of bike lanes, specifically three major streets in Toronto.<\/p>\n<p>A cyclists\u2019 advocacy group immediately launched a Charter challenge, claiming the law was \u201cill-conceived and arbitrary\u201d and would result in an increased number of injuries and deaths.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis reckless legislative act infringes the rights of people who ride bikes, other road users, and\/or pedestrians in the City of Toronto under s. 7 of the Charter by depriving them of life and security of the person contrary to principles of fundamental justice,\u201d the court application, filed by CycleTO, claimed.<\/p>\n<p>Ford has long pointed to \u201cnasty, terrible\u201d bike lanes as one of the sources of traffic congestion and has advocated for separated routes to be moved to secondary routes instead of arterial roads.<\/p>\n<p>He has insisted he is not opposed to the infrastructure but believes it should not be added to major routes.<\/p>\n<p>The Ford government\u2019s 2025 budget included the removal of additional lanes on Avenue Road, effectively replacing the law passed at the end of 2024.<\/p>\n<p>Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<p>The revised law changed Ontario\u2019s language from requiring the \u201cremoval\u201d of specific bike lanes to \u201creconfiguring\u201d them so an extra lane of traffic could be added back in.<\/p>\n<p>In its court application, CycleTO claimed secondary roads \u201cdo not exist,\u201d that there was \u201cno rational connection\u201d between the government\u2019s gridlock-reducing intent and potential effect, and suggested that the government is aware of the potential harms.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\tRuling chides lack of government evidence\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>In his ruling, Schabas said CycleTo had successfully argued that removing bike lanes would \u201cput people at increased risk of harm and death\u201d when they ride in the city.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe evidence is clear that restoring a lane of motor vehicle traffic, where it will involve the removal of the protected, or separated, nature of the target bike lanes, will create greater risk to cyclists and to other users of the roads,\u201d part of the ruling said.<\/p>\n<p>Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<p>It also said removing bike lanes would not help reduce congestion.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe evidence shows that restoring lanes for cars will not result in less congestion, as it will induce more people to use cars and therefore any reduction in driving time will be short-lived, if at all, and will lead to more congestion,\u201d the ruling said. \u201cThis makes the law arbitrary.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It said the points offered by the government were \u201cweak anecdotal evidence and expert opinion which is unsupported, unpersuasive and contrary to the consensus view.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The ruling does not affect the parts of the law which require provincial approval for new bike lanes, which will remain in place.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t&amp;copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Ford government says it will appeal a court ruling which found its plan to tear out dedicated&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":105555,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[44544,2147,18405,50,18404,80,67893],"class_list":{"0":"post-105554","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"tag-bike-lanes","9":"tag-canada","10":"tag-ford-government","11":"tag-news","12":"tag-ontario-politics","13":"tag-politics","14":"tag-toronto-politics"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114943761285290099","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105554\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/105555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}