{"id":109645,"date":"2025-08-01T07:17:22","date_gmt":"2025-08-01T07:17:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/109645\/"},"modified":"2025-08-01T07:17:22","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T07:17:22","slug":"i-regret-claiming-social-security-at-75","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/109645\/","title":{"rendered":"I Regret Claiming Social Security at 75"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Older <\/p>\n

\n Jose Luis Pelaez Inc \/ Getty Images\/Blend Images <\/p>\n

Commitment to Our Readers<\/p>\n

GOBankingRates’ editorial team is committed to bringing you unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methodologies to evaluate financial products and services – our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines<\/a> and our products and services review methodology<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

20 Years<\/strong>
Helping You Live Richer<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Trusted by<\/strong>
Millions of Readers<\/p>\n

Terry M. thought she was playing it smart. The 80-year-old retired<\/a> nonprofit director from Portland, Oregon, waited until age 75 to claim Social Security benefits, believing she\u2019d maximize her monthly payments. Instead, she discovered a costly mistake that\u2019s haunting her golden years.<\/p>\n

\u201cI wish someone had explained to me that Social Security stops growing at 70,\u201d Terry reflected during a recent interview. \u201cI always found that so confusing and whoops, turns out I gave up five years of payments for absolutely nothing!\u201d<\/p>\n

Terry\u2019s story illustrates a common but expensive Social Security timing mistake that costs retirees thousands of dollars they\u2019ll never recover<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

How a Social Security Delay Cost This Retiree <\/p>\n

Born in 1944, Terry spent 35 years working for various nonprofit organizations in Oregon, eventually earning $120,000 annually as an executive director before retiring in 2014 at age 70. Her plan was simple: Delay Social Security as long as possible to maximize benefits<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cI kept hearing about how your Social Security grows by 8% each year you delay past full retirement age,\u201d Terry explained. \u201cI figured waiting until 75 would give me the biggest possible check. I thought I was actually being a genius!\u201d<\/p>\n

What Terry didn\u2019t realize is that delayed retirement credits stop accumulating at age 70. For someone born in 1944, full retirement age is 66. Delaying from 66 to 70 increased her benefits by 32% \u2014 but waiting from 70 to 75 added nothing.<\/p>\n

Based on her earnings history and birth year, Terry\u2019s Social Security benefit at full retirement age (66) would have been approximately $2,380 monthly. With delayed retirement credits through age 70, that increased to about $3,141 monthly.<\/p>\n

At age 75 when she finally claimed? Still $3,141 monthly.<\/p>\n

Why Smart Retirees Make This Social Security Timing Error<\/p>\n

Terry\u2019s error isn\u2019t uncommon among educated retirees. The 8% annual increase from delayed retirement credits sounds so appealing that many assume it continues indefinitely.<\/p>\n

\u201cI had a master\u2019s degree and managed million-dollar nonprofit budgets,\u201d Terry noted. \u201cBut I never took the time to really understand Social Security rules. I just assumed longer delays meant bigger benefits.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Several factors contributed to her miscalculation, including advice from uneducated friends, confusion about different Social Security rules<\/a> and an overconfidence in other savings.\u00a0<\/p>\n

How the Opportunity Cost Made Her Social Security Mistake Worse<\/p>\n

Terry\u2019s mistake wasn\u2019t just about missing Social Security payments. That money could have been invested or used to enhance her quality of life during healthier years.<\/p>\n

\u201cThose were good years,\u201d she shared. \u201cI could travel, I had energy, my husband was still alive. I\u2019m not saying I didn\u2019t \u2018live,\u2019 but I might\u2019ve been more aggressive with that whole enjoying your life thing.’\u201d<\/p>\n

The missed Social Security income also meant drawing down other retirement accounts faster. \u201cI had to take larger 403(b) withdrawals to cover expenses,\u201d Terry explained. \u201cThat money was invested and growing. The Social Security would have let me leave more of it alone. Oops!\u201d<\/p>\n

What This Oregon Retiree Should Have Done Instead<\/p>\n

Social Security planning experts say Terry should have claimed benefits at 70 \u2014 the latest age that provides any increase.<\/p>\n

For someone in Terry\u2019s situation (born in 1944 with substantial earnings history), the optimal strategy would have been:<\/p>\n