![\"An](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/24c20d5aa0baa3b683e3db509ef9e7c28cdd3311.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n\u201cBuilding the strategic cycling corridors, and links to all the neighbouring activity centres \u2013 the places where people work, the places people shop and places where people go to school \u2013 would drive value into the SRL,\u201d Blom said.<\/p>\n
Loading<\/p>\n
\u201cPlaces that aren\u2019t 100 per cent connected by the SRL could be accessible to an SRL station with a quick five- or 10-minute bike ride.\u201d<\/p>\n
This combination of trains and bikes is used most successfully in the Netherlands, where about half of all train passengers arrive at stations by bicycle. The main train station in Utrecht has parking for 12,500 bikes.<\/p>\n
Blom said one missed opportunity was to build the long-planned but never-built bike path along the Clayton South Main Drain, which would connect thousands of homes between Moorabin and Clarinda to the SRL station at Clayton.<\/p>\n
An SRL Authority spokesperson said the project would include 15 kilometres of new or upgraded walking and bicycle paths, and almost 3500 bike-parking spaces near the new stations.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
An artist\u2019s impression of the SRL station at Monash University.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cExtensive community consultation has shaped the draft structure plans \u2026 and we\u2019ll keep working with locals and stakeholders before the plans are finalised,\u201d they said.<\/p>\n
Monash City Council \u2013 which takes in Clayton, Monash and Glen Waverly SRL stations \u2013 has also cast doubt on the SRL\u2019s aspirations for a transport \u201cmode shift\u201d.<\/p>\n
Loading<\/p>\n
\u201cAchieving modal shift also relies on significant investment in active transport improvements to the bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure within the precinct,\u201d the council said in its submission on the draft structure plans.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe active transport mode split targets included in the documents are ambitious, and council is not convinced the recommended active transport projects will achieve these targets.\u201d<\/p>\n
Whitehorse City Council also raised concerns that the SRL\u2019s plans would not deliver the intended shift away from driving towards sustainable transport in Box Hill and Burwood, given the \u201cout of kilter\u201d level of investment planned for walking and riding infrastructure.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is limited information for how safe, quality cycling infrastructures are to be provided in areas where road space is limited and modal priorities are not explicitly clear or fully resolved,\u201d the council said in its submission.<\/p>\n
The lack of shade planned for key walking and cycling routes would also prevent people from getting to the stations, the council said.<\/p>\n
Loading<\/p>\n
Monash Council said it had been left on the hook to pay for the walking and riding projects identified in the draft plans, and wants the SRL Authority to pay for more of this infrastructure.<\/p>\n
A Planning Panels Victoria advisory committee will next hold public hearings into the draft structure plans starting on August 25, and specifically examine whether the plans \u201cfacilitate a suitable and achievable\u201d shift away from car travel in the SRL precincts.<\/p>\n