{"id":116466,"date":"2025-08-03T20:35:10","date_gmt":"2025-08-03T20:35:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/116466\/"},"modified":"2025-08-03T20:35:10","modified_gmt":"2025-08-03T20:35:10","slug":"crypto-markets-weekly-winners-and-losers-m-cfx-bonk-fartcoin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/116466\/","title":{"rendered":"Crypto market\u2019s weekly winners and losers – M, CFX, BONK, FARTCOIN"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tKey Takeaways<\/strong><\/p>\n

MemeCore [M], Four [FORM], and CONFLUX [CFX] led the week with sharp price surges. In contrast, Fartcoin [FARTCOIN], Bonk [BONK], and Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] saw significant decline.<\/p>\n

This week in crypto<\/a>\u00a0saw a sharp market pullback.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Bitcoin [BTC]<\/a> dipped below $113,700 and Ethereum [ETH]<\/a> slipped over 5%, driven by weak U.S. jobs data and rising recession fears. <\/p>\n

Meanwhile, ETFs saw major outflows<\/a>, ending a strong inflow streak. In policy, the U.S. unveiled a 160-page crypto report.<\/p>\n

And yet, the standout volatility came from the memecoin sector<\/a>, underscoring its high-beta, speculative character.<\/p>\n

Weekly winners<\/b>
\nMemecore [M] \u2014 Memecoin blockchain posted a sharp bullish reversal\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

MemeCore [M]<\/a> dominated the charts this week with a clean 35%+ move off its $0.32 base. In fact, it snapped a two-week bleed where it dumped over 50% from its $0.07 ICO level.<\/p>\n

The week kicked off with a textbook retest of the $0.30 support after a brutal 29% drawdown the week prior.\u00a0<\/p>\n

From there, bulls stepped in hard. M saw a 42% intraday rip on the 2nd of August that sent it smashing through the $0.45 resistance. Despite the surge, RSI stayed below overheated territory.<\/p>\n

\"M\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Source: TradingView (M\/USDT)<\/p>\n

But things cooled quickly near $0.70. <\/p>\n

That level acted like a supply wall, triggering sell pressure and trimming gains into the weekly close. <\/p>\n

Still, M made back nearly all of its recent losses and reclaimed bullish structure, definitely one to watch if it consolidates above $0.45.<\/p>\n

Four [FORM] \u2014 Community-governed asset repeated a key pattern<\/b><\/p>\n

Four [FORM]<\/a> wrapped the week as the second-highest gainer, notching a clean 20% move and printing a high wick up to $4.\u00a0<\/p>\n

While it\u2019s since pulled back to around $3.70, it\u2019s still holding above the key $3.60 level which is a spot that acted as stiff resistance for the past two weeks.<\/p>\n

This kind of S\/R flip suggests solid bid support underneath. Bulls are clearly defending that level, and if this zone continues to hold, it could set the stage for a proper breakout setup.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Technically speaking, if FORM can build acceptance above $3.80 on strong volume, it opens the door for a breakout toward new local high, making it the altcoin to monitor going into next week.<\/p>\n

Conflux [CFX] \u2014\u00a0 Public Layer-1 blockchain attracted strong bid support<\/b><\/p>\n

Conflux [CFX]<\/a> is gaining ground fast, clocking a 15% weekly move off its $0.18 open, landing it back in the top gainers for the second week straight.<\/p>\n

Interestingly, CFX was last week\u2019s<\/a> breakout leader but ended up closing down nearly 15% at $0.15, as spot demand didn\u2019t follow through and longs got wiped out hard.<\/p>\n

This week looks stronger. The daily chart is flashing solid demand, with CFX breaking the $0.20 resistance at press time. But bulls still need a clean break above the $0.25 mark to lock in the breakout.<\/p>\n

Until then, it\u2019s at a make-or-break level. Keep an eye \u2014 CFX is coiling at a key inflection zone.<\/p>\n

Other notable winners<\/b><\/p>\n

Outside the majors, altcoin rockets<\/a> stole the spotlight this week.<\/p>\n

TROLL [TROLL] led the charge with a staggering 228% rally, fueling an explosive memecoin breakout. League of Kingdoms [LOKA] followed with a 127% gain, while Pepe Bundle [PUNDLE] surged 73%, respectively.<\/p>\n

Weekly losers<\/b>
\nFartcoin [FARTCOIN] \u2014\u00a0 Memecoin extended its weekly decline<\/b><\/p>\n

Fartcoin [FARTCOIN]<\/a> printed its worst weekly close since March. It has slipped 29% off its $1.30 open and ended the week around $0.93. That makes it the biggest loser on the board.<\/p>\n

In fact, the move nuked all the progress it had made clawing out of its months-long range. The $1.60 rejection level from late May is now looking like a firm ceiling.<\/p>\n

To make matters worse, FARTCOIN flipped its weekly MACD bearish for the first time, signaling that downside momentum could linger heading into next week.<\/p>\n

\"FARTCOIN\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Source: TradingView (FARTCOIN\/USDT)<\/p>\n

In that case, a retest of the $0.75 demand zone is back on the radar. That level acted as a springboard in the June\u2013July run, lining up with a bullish MACD flip back then.<\/p>\n

This time, though, the setup looks weaker.<\/p>\n

With MACD crossing bearish and momentum fading, a breakdown below $0.75 wouldn\u2019t be a shock. And as it stands, a clean bounce from here feels unlikely unless fresh bids show up fast.<\/p>\n

Bonk [BONK] \u2014 Meme asset posted its worst weekly close of the quarter<\/b><\/p>\n

Bonk [BONK]<\/a> pulled back 24.6% this week from its $0.000033 open, making it the second-biggest loser.\u00a0<\/p>\n

After a strong Q2 run, this is BONK\u2019s first red weekly candle, snapping a five-week streak of higher highs that finally saw it break through the $0.000040 mark.<\/p>\n

Technically, the structure isn\u2019t broken.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The broader market flipping risk-off dragged BONK with it, but the trend still holds for now. The last three daily candles are showing signs of range-building around the $0.000025 level.<\/p>\n

If this base holds and flows return, BONK might be setting up for a re-entry, especially if we see volume pick up near that support.<\/p>\n

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] \u2014 Digital layer failed to hold key support\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL]<\/a> wrapped the week with a rough 24% drop from its $1.60 open, landing it among the top weekly losers.\u00a0<\/p>\n

While it\u2019s seen sharp pullbacks before, this one hit harder. It broke clean below the $1.70-$2.00 range it had been holding for weeks.<\/p>\n

The breakdown dragged VIRTUAL all the way to $1.12\u00a0which flips the chart structure decisively bearish. This move invalidates the prior range and confirms sellers are in control.<\/p>\n

Even though it saw a brief 4.54% intraday pop, price is struggling to get traction above the $1.20 zone. Without clear demand, that bounce looks more like relief than any kind of trend reversal.<\/p>\n

Other notable losers<\/b><\/p>\n

In the broader market<\/a>, downside volatility hit hard.<\/p>\n

Radix [XRD] led the losers with a 38% drop, followed by Graphite Protocol [GP], down 36.7%, and Tokenize Xchange [TKZ], which slipped 36.6% as momentum sharply cooled.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/b><\/p>\n

This week was a rollercoaster. Big pumps, sharp dips, and nonstop action. As always, stay sharp, do your own research, and trade smart.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tNext: Bitcoin\u2019s balancing act: Will altcoin momentum tip BTC\u2019s scale?<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Key Takeaways MemeCore [M], Four [FORM], and CONFLUX [CFX] led the week with sharp price surges. In contrast,…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":116467,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[3244,64,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-116466","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business","8":"tag-ambcrypto","9":"tag-business","10":"tag-united-states","11":"tag-unitedstates","12":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114966752370341449","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116466\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/116467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}