{"id":124129,"date":"2025-08-06T17:18:13","date_gmt":"2025-08-06T17:18:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/124129\/"},"modified":"2025-08-06T17:18:13","modified_gmt":"2025-08-06T17:18:13","slug":"google-could-add-samsungs-default-navigation-bar-layout-to-pixel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/124129\/","title":{"rendered":"Google could add Samsung&#8217;s default navigation bar layout to Pixel"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t<img width=\"1600\" height=\"800\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/pixel_3_navigation_buttons_1.jpg\" class=\"skip-lazy wp-post-image\" alt=\"\"  decoding=\"async\" fetchpriority=\"high\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Samsung and Google might utilize the same operating system for their respective smartphones, but the end user experience can vary wildly between both brands, and nowhere is that more obvious that with the default navigation bar layout in One UI. A future update, though, could allow Pixel users to recreate a Galaxy-style setup, no rooting required.<\/p>\n<p>The folks at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.androidauthority.com\/android-flip-navigation-bar-rumor-3584159\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Android Authority<\/a> spotted code in the latest <a href=\"https:\/\/9to5google.com\/2025\/07\/24\/android-canary-2507\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Android Canary release<\/a> pointing to new settings for the three-button navigation layout on Pixel. Traditionally, this triple button UI \u2014 which, in most ways, has been replaced by modern gesture navigation \u2014 aligns Back, Home, and Recents from left to right. Galaxy devices, however, have long utilized the opposite order (Recents, Home, Back), leaving a stock Android-esque three button layout and gesture navigation buried in settings. Rather than waiting for Samsung to align with a more standard setup, it sounds like Google might be making it a little easier for Samsung fans to adjust to a fresh Pixel.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"988\" height=\"864\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Default-vs-flipped-three-button.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-683443\"  \/>Android Authority\u2018s mockup showing swapped navigation buttons.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, Android Canary doesn\u2019t actually have the ability to change these settings yet \u2014 it remains a few strings of code, without any user-facing settings or hidden flags to enable \u2014 but even without Android Authority\u2019s mockup above, it\u2019s easy to imagine what this looks like. While I doubt most current Pixel fans would switch to this style of navigation, more choice is great news for those who prefer how Samsung designs its software. And considering how locked down Google\u2019s launcher often feels these days, a little more customization might go a long way.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s no sign on when, or even if, this setting will roll out to Pixel devices, though we are due for a pretty big upgrade to Android 16 later this year. For now, though, any Galaxy fans thinking of switching to the Pixel 10 later this month might just need to get used to a slightly different method of navigating around your device \u2014 or, at the very least, finally make the leap to gestures in place of those traditional buttons. Silver lining: it\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/9to5google.com\/2025\/08\/04\/samsung-android-gesture-navigation-one-ui-8\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">about to be a lot easier to find<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"disclaimer-affiliate\">FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. <a href=\"https:\/\/9to5mac.com\/about\/#affiliate\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">More.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Samsung and Google might utilize the same operating system for their respective smartphones, but the end user experience&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":124130,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[611,158,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-124129","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-mobile","8":"tag-mobile","9":"tag-technology","10":"tag-united-states","11":"tag-unitedstates","12":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114982964848208875","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124129"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124129\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/124130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}