{"id":13253,"date":"2025-06-25T10:27:08","date_gmt":"2025-06-25T10:27:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/13253\/"},"modified":"2025-06-25T10:27:08","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T10:27:08","slug":"tennis-player-association-files-new-complaint-against-atp-wta-tours-removes-star-complaints","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/13253\/","title":{"rendered":"Tennis player association files new complaint against ATP, WTA Tours, removes star complaints"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Professional Tennis Players Association<\/a> (PTPA) has submitted an updated complaint in its antitrust lawsuit against tennis\u2019 governing bodies<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The organization, which was co-founded by Novak Djokovic in 2020, has taken out critiques of the tour schedule from players who are not named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including French Open<\/a> champions Coco Gauff<\/a> and Carlos Alcaraz<\/a>.<\/p>\n

It has also removed two defendants from a group it characterized as a \u201ccartel\u201d in its initial action, which was filed in London, New York City and Brussels. The International Tennis Federation is off the suit filed in New York City, as is the tennis anti-doping and anti-corruption body, the International Tennis Integrity Agency.<\/p>\n

A source briefed on the PTPA\u2019s legal proceedings, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect relationships in tennis, said that the ITF and the ITIA had been removed to focus on the alleged antitrust violations by the men\u2019s (ATP) and women\u2019s (WTA) tennis tours.<\/p>\n

The PTPA filed its initial lawsuit in March. That filing described the biggest governing bodies in tennis as a \u201ccartel,\u201d which suppresses wages, player opportunity and rival tournaments \u201cto the harm of players and fans alike.\u201d The PTPA alleged numerous antitrust violations, all of which have been denied by the accused governing bodies, who last month filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit.<\/p>\n

The men\u2019s and women\u2019s tours argue that their bylaws require players to settle disputes through arbitration, rather than in court. In May, they and the ITF and ITIA filed a joint motion to dismiss the PTPA as a plaintiff, on the grounds that it cannot orchestrate such an action because it does not have a formal membership. A judge has yet to rule on that motion.<\/p>\n

The original lawsuit listed 12 player plaintiffs, including co-founder Vasek Pospisil, and Reilly Opelka and Sorana Cirstea, who are active players. Djokovic was not a named plaintiff. There are now 14, with the addition of Sachia Vickery and Nicolas Zanellato, though there are still no top-tier stars among the named complainants, giving the impression, rightly or wrongly, that the PTPA\u2019s lawsuit does not have the support of most of the most powerful voices in the game.<\/p>\n

A spokesperson for the PTPA said at the time that more than 250 professional players across all tiers of the sport, as well as the organization\u2019s executive committee, which includes Djokovic, supported the action.<\/p>\n

Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, Djokovic said in a news conference at the Miami Open: \u201cTo be quite frank with you, there are things that I agree with in the lawsuit and there are also things that I don\u2019t agree with.<\/p>\n

\u201cI found that maybe some wording was quite strong in there.\u201d<\/p>\n

The updated complaint, filed in New York Tuesday evening, has changed some wording. The original was written with the kind of confrontational language that is typical of U.S. lawsuits, with the four Grand Slams \u2014 Wimbledon and the Australian, French and U.S. Opens \u2014 described as \u201cco-conspirators\u201d alongside the defendants\u2019 alleged \u201ccartel\u201d.<\/p>\n

Some of that language is still there, including in the opening salvo:<\/p>\n

\u201cProfessional tennis players are stuck in a rigged game. Not on the court, where fierce competition between players delights millions of fans worldwide, but off of it, where players are forced to endure grueling schedules, capped earnings, abusive and invasive investigations and discipline, and have limited control over their own careers and brands. This is because a cartel of professional tennis tour organizers and tournament operators have conspired to avoid competition amongst themselves and to shut out outside tournaments, affording them complete control over the players\u2019 pay and working conditions.\u201d<\/p>\n

The four Grand Slams will not be named as defendants for at least another 90 days, amid settlement discussions between them and the PTPA, according to a filing lodged this week.<\/p>\n

The updated complaint focuses more closely on alleged violations of antitrust law by the two tours, while countering the arguments that they have made to convince the court to dismiss the case.\u00a0 It also focuses more heavily on the governance structures of the tours, outlining how the players are not equal partners in the operations, as the tours\u2019 leaders have claimed.\u00a0 The original, which included reference to complaints by Alcaraz, Gauff and five-time Grand Slam champion Iga \u015awi\u0105tek, has omitted those complaints. It had used quotes from those players in news conferences and interviews in which they criticized how tennis is scheduled. Since the initial complaint was filed, a group of top-10 ranked male and female players has held meetings with the four Grand Slams to discuss an increased proportion of their revenues being shared with players as prize money.<\/p>\n

This is one of the goals of the PTPA lawsuit, and the PTPA has also held meetings with leaders of the Grand Slams. In the past, those leaders have expressed a desire to restructure tennis, creating a streamlined event calendar that revolves around their events and the 1,000-level ATP and WTA events, which are one rung below their tournaments.<\/p>\n

The discussions between the Grand Slams and PTPA aim to develop a framework for a new structure for professional tennis. That structure would then be circulated to the ATP, WTA, and ITF for their input.<\/p>\n

The Grand Slams and other governing bodies, however, have been doing this dance since last year, when the Grand Slams presented the tours with a plan for a so-called \u201cpremium tour,\u201d with fewer events and a pooling of their lucrative media rights.<\/p>\n

That plan never went beyond discussions, and earlier this year, the ATP and WTA presented the Grand Slams with their own plan to reform tennis, which the Grand Slams rejected out of hand. The PTPA believes that the spectre of lengthy and expensive antitrust litigation will create more urgency for change. Thus far, this has not been the case.<\/p>\n

While their complaints have been eliminated from the formal PTPA complaint, top players on the ATP and WTA Tours remain in discussions about the schedule and revenue sharing in their sport.<\/p>\n

To achieve a high ranking, players typically need to participate in around 20 tournaments each year worldwide. The top players, who regularly go deep in those tournaments, have said that they don\u2019t receive necessary rest and that the sport\u2019s roughly four-week off-season is far too short.<\/p>\n

They are also subject to financial penalties and other punishments if they skip mandatory tournaments.<\/p>\n

The players \u2014 and the PTPA \u2014 also want the Grand Slams and ATP and WTA tournaments to share a higher proportion of revenue with players. They could offer to share more than the roughly 20 percent of their revenues with players by significantly increasing prize money.<\/p>\n

Major American sports leagues, such as the NBA and NFL, share approximately 50 percent of their revenues with players. Grand Slam prize money typically amounts to between 13 and 18 percent of each tournament\u2019s annual revenue, while for ATP and WTA events, that figure rises closer to 25 or 30 percent.<\/p>\n

The courts will next address the defendants\u2019 motions to dismiss the case or to move it to arbitration.<\/p>\n

(Photo: Luke Walker \/ Getty Images)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) has submitted an updated complaint in its antitrust lawsuit against tennis\u2019 governing…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":13254,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[62,222,1464,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-13253","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-tennis","8":"tag-sports","9":"tag-sports-business","10":"tag-tennis","11":"tag-united-states","12":"tag-unitedstates","13":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114743531732406848","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13253\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13254"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}