{"id":135485,"date":"2025-08-10T23:05:10","date_gmt":"2025-08-10T23:05:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/135485\/"},"modified":"2025-08-10T23:05:10","modified_gmt":"2025-08-10T23:05:10","slug":"computer-says-which-jobs-are-safest-from-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/135485\/","title":{"rendered":"Computer says&#8230;Which jobs are safest from AI?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Google chief executive Sundar Pichai says ramping up artificial intelligence capabilities in products is resulting in people using them more and increased demand for its cloud computing services &#8211; Copyright AFP Glenn CHAPMAN<\/p>\n<p>It is a commonly discussed issue these days \u2013 the jobs that are most at risk and, conversely, seemingly the best <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uscareerinstitute.edu\/blog\/65-jobs-with-the-lowest-risk-of-automation-by-ai-and-robots\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">protected from the advance of artificial intelligence<\/a>. Across different surveys on the subject there are patterns of similarity and difference.<\/p>\n<p>According to a new review, emergency medical technicians rank as the most AI-resistant due to high public interaction requirements. Overall, healthcare dominates the rankings, with 3 medical professions in the top five most secure jobs, from the perspective of the U.S. economy.<\/p>\n<p>With artificial intelligence transforming workplaces at a rapid pace, over 73% of U.S. companies now use AI in at least one business area. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eskimoz.co.uk\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">A new study by Eskimoz<\/a> analysed occupational data across multiple job categories to identify which careers remain most resistant to AI replacement.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/spreadsheets\/d\/e\/2PACX-1vQxY78V-V8pKIaaXvpO74TmKd41QH-BMERbj-W-uhnet7FfeXp-GLu6ngjvELWuyBFr-1GHm6o7xFNH\/pubhtml\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">research evaluated each occupation<\/a> using two factors: the percentage of public interaction required and automation risk scores from industry assessments. Jobs were ranked using an AI Resistance Score calculated by combining inverted automation risk (where lower risk yields higher scores) with public interaction percentages, then normalized on a 1-100 scale to identify positions where human skills remain irreplaceable.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The most AI resistant jobs?<\/strong><\/p>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Occupation and occupational group<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Percent who must interact with the general public<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Automation Risk\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Score<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Emergency medical technicians<\/td>\n<td>100.00%<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<td>100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Healthcare social workers<\/td>\n<td>100%<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<td>98<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lawyers<\/td>\n<td>100%<\/td>\n<td>29%<\/td>\n<td>86<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Medical and health services managers<\/td>\n<td>89.80%<\/td>\n<td>26%<\/td>\n<td>82<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>First-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers<\/td>\n<td>78.50%<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<td>80<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Human resources managers<\/td>\n<td>82.90%<\/td>\n<td>26%<\/td>\n<td>78<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>General and operations managers<\/td>\n<td>80.30%<\/td>\n<td>36%<\/td>\n<td>70<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Maintenance and repair workers, general<\/td>\n<td>71.60%<\/td>\n<td>35%<\/td>\n<td>65<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>First-line supervisors of office and administrative support workers<\/td>\n<td>81.60%<\/td>\n<td>50%<\/td>\n<td>62<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Training and development specialists<\/td>\n<td>57.80%<\/td>\n<td>29%<\/td>\n<td>60<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<p>Based on the above assessment, <strong>emergency medical technicians<\/strong> rank <strong>first<\/strong> with the highest <strong>AI Resistance Score of 100<\/strong>. EMTs require <strong>100% public interaction<\/strong> in critical medical emergencies where human judgment proves irreplaceable, leading to only <strong>7% automation risk<\/strong>, the lowest among all occupations studied.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Healthcare social workers<\/strong> secure <strong>second place<\/strong> with a <strong>score of 98<\/strong>. These professionals require <strong>100% public interaction,<\/strong> providing emotional support and crisis intervention that demands genuine human involvement. This results in a low <strong>11% automation risk<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lawyers<\/strong> rank <strong>third<\/strong> with an <strong>AI Resistance Score of 86<\/strong>. Legal professionals maintain <strong>100% public engagement<\/strong> through client consultations and courtroom advocacy, facing only <strong>29% automation risk<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Medical and health services managers<\/strong> take <strong>fourth place<\/strong>, scoring <strong>81.82 in AI resistance<\/strong>. These professionals show <strong>89.8% public engagement<\/strong> while coordinating between patients, medical staff, and administrators. Healthcare management\u2019s interpersonal skill requirements result in a <strong>26% automation risk<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>First-line supervisors of construction trades<\/strong> rank <strong>fifth<\/strong>, following medical professionals closely in AI resistance score. These supervisors post a <strong>78.5% public interaction<\/strong> rate while managing teams and ensuring safety compliance. Their on-site leadership and problem-solving abilities lead to just <strong>17% automation risk<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Human resources managers<\/strong> secure <strong>sixth place<\/strong> with a <strong>78 AI Resistance Score<\/strong>. The HR professionals demonstrate <strong>82.9% public interaction<\/strong> through employee relations and conflict resolution. HR management\u2019s focus on workplace dynamics puts them at a low <strong>26% automation risk<\/strong>, similar to medical professionals.<\/p>\n<p><strong>General and operations managers<\/strong> rank <strong>seventh<\/strong>, scoring <strong>70<\/strong>. With <strong>80.3% public interaction<\/strong>, these leaders coordinate across departments and manage stakeholder relationships. Their role puts them at <strong>36% automation risk<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Maintenance and repair workers<\/strong> take <strong>eighth place<\/strong> with a <strong>score of 65<\/strong>. These professionals show <strong>71.6% public interaction<\/strong> while diagnosing problems and explaining repairs to customers. Practical problem-solving and customer service combine to resist automation, resulting in a <strong>35% automation risk<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>First-line supervisors of office workers<\/strong> rank <strong>ninth<\/strong> with a 62-point AI resistance \u00a0score. These supervisors maintain <strong>81.6% public engagement<\/strong> through team management. Human elements in motivation and conflict resolution remain substantial despite a <strong>50% automation risk<\/strong> \u2013 the highest in the top 10.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Training and development specialists<\/strong> complete the <strong>top 10<\/strong>, coming just behind first-line supervisors. While showing <strong>57.8% public interaction<\/strong>, these professionals create personalized learning experiences. Understanding individual needs and inspiring professional growth remains human work, with a <strong>29% automation risk<\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Google chief executive Sundar Pichai says ramping up artificial intelligence capabilities in products is resulting in people using&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":135486,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[691,27485,745,3432,158,67,132,68,8066],"class_list":{"0":"post-135485","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-computing","8":"tag-ai","9":"tag-computers","10":"tag-computing","11":"tag-data","12":"tag-technology","13":"tag-united-states","14":"tag-unitedstates","15":"tag-us","16":"tag-work"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115006978637967084","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135485\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/135486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}