{"id":148883,"date":"2025-08-15T21:59:17","date_gmt":"2025-08-15T21:59:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/148883\/"},"modified":"2025-08-15T21:59:17","modified_gmt":"2025-08-15T21:59:17","slug":"scalable-photonic-quantum-technologies-nature-materials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/148883\/","title":{"rendered":"Scalable photonic quantum technologies | Nature Materials"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Dowling, J. P. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361<\/b>, 1655\u20131674 (2003).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    O\u2019Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vu\u010dkovi\u0107, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 3<\/b>, 687\u2013695 (2009).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nat. Photon. 1<\/b>, 165\u2013171 (2007).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sangouard, N., Simon, C., de Riedmatten, H. & Gisin, N. Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83<\/b>, 33\u201380 (2011).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ralph, T. C. & Pryde, G. J. Optical quantum computation. Prog. Opt. 54<\/b>, 209\u2013269 (2010).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453<\/b>, 1023\u20131030 (2008).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306<\/b>, 1330\u20131336 (2004).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell\u2019s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47<\/b>, 460\u2013463 (1981).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bennett, C. H., Bessette, F., Brassard, G., Salvail, L. & Smolin, J. Experimental quantum cryptography. J. Cryptol. 5<\/b>, 3\u201328 (1992).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Xiao, M., Wu, L.-A. & Kimble, H. J. Precision measurement beyond the shot-noise limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59<\/b>, 278\u2013281 (1987).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bouwmeester, D. et al. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390<\/b>, 575\u2013579 (1997).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Furusawa, A. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science 282<\/b>, 706\u2013709 (1998).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    O\u2019Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C. & Branning, D. Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-not gate. Nature 426<\/b>, 264\u2013267 (2003).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Walther, P. et al. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434<\/b>, 169\u2013176 (2005).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409<\/b>, 46\u201352 (2001).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pan, J.-W., Gasparoni, S., Ursin, R., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement purification of arbitrary unknown states. Nature 423<\/b>, 417\u2013422 (2003).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kok, P. et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79<\/b>, 135\u2013174 (2007).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pan, J.-W. et al. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84<\/b>, 777\u2013838 (2012).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Weedbrook, C. et al. Gaussian quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84<\/b>, 621\u2013669 (2012).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kwiat, P. G. et al. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75<\/b>, 4337\u20134341 (1995).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kimble, H. J., Dagenais, M. & Mandel, L. Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39<\/b>, 691\u2013695 (1977).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Senellart, P., Solomon, G. & White, A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12<\/b>, 1026\u20131039 (2017).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, X.-L. et al. Experimental ten-photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117<\/b>, 210502 (2016).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mosley, P. J. et al. Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100<\/b>, 133601 (2008).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Takeuchi, S. Beamlike twin-photon generation by use of type II parametric downconversion. Opt. Lett. 26<\/b>, 843\u2013845 (2001).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhong, H.-S. et al. 12-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121<\/b>, 250505 (2018).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Silverstone, J. W. et al. On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources. Nat. Photon. 8<\/b>, 104\u2013108 (2014).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Paesani, S. et al. Near-ideal spontaneous photon sources in silicon quantum photonics. Nat. Commun. 11<\/b>, 2505 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pittman, T., Jacobs, B. & Franson, J. Single photons on pseudodemand from stored parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 66<\/b>, 042303 (2002).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Migdall, A. L., Branning, D. & Castelletto, S. Tailoring single-photon and multiphoton probabilities of a single-photon on-demand source. Phys. Rev. A 66<\/b>, 053805 (2002).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kaneda, F. & Kwiat, P. G. High-efficiency single-photon generation via large-scale active time multiplexing. Sci. Adv. 5<\/b>, eaaw8586 (2019).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Najer, D. et al. A gated quantum dot strongly coupled to an optical microcavity. Nature 575<\/b>, 622\u2013627 (2019).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    He, Y.-M. et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8<\/b>, 213\u2013217 (2013).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, H. et al. Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities. Nat. Photon. 13<\/b>, 770\u2013775 (2019).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tomm, N. et al. A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16<\/b>, 399\u2013403 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ding, X. et al. High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing. Nat. Photon. 19<\/b>, 387\u2013391 (2025).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S. & Stobbe, S. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87<\/b>, 347\u2013400 (2015).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhai, L. et al. Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17<\/b>, 829\u2013833 (2022).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lindner, N. H. & Rudolph, T. A photonic cluster state machine gun. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103<\/b>, 113602 (2009).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vahlbruch, H., Mehmet, M., Danzmann, K. & Schnabel, R. Detection of 15\u2009dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117<\/b>, 110801 (2016).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dodd, J. L., Ralph, T. C. & Milburn, G. J. Experimental requirements for Grover\u2019s algorithm in optical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 68<\/b>, 042328 (2003).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Procopio, L. M. et al. Experimental superposition of orders of quantum gates. Nat. Commun. 6<\/b>, 7913 (2015).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Weston, M. M. et al. Quantum channel correction outperforming direct transmission. Nat. Commun. 13<\/b>, 1832 (2022).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86<\/b>, 5188\u20135191 (2001).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jin, R.-B. et al. Pulsed Sagnac polarization-entangled photon source with a PPKTP crystal at telecom wavelength. Opt. Express 22<\/b>, 11498\u201311507 (2014).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Marcikic, I. et al. Time-bin entangled qubits for quantum communication created by femtosecond pulses. Phys. Rev. A 66<\/b>, 062308 (2002).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jouguet, P., Kunz-Jacques, S., Leverrier, A., Grangier, P. & Diamanti, E. Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Nat. Photon. 7<\/b>, 378\u2013381 (2013).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Xiong, C. et al. Active temporal multiplexing of indistinguishable heralded single photons. Nat. Commun. 7<\/b>, 10853 (2016).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, H. et al. Boson sampling with 20 input photons in 60-mode interferometers at 1014 state spaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123<\/b>, 250503 (2019).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 14<\/b>, 273\u2013284 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pelucchi, E. et al. The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4<\/b>, 194\u2013208 (2022).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jeffrey, T. & Hull, D. Integrated Photonics (OP-TEC, Univ. Central Florida, 2016)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Silverstone, J. W., Bonneau, D., O\u2019Brien, J. L. & Thompson, M. G. Silicon quantum photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22<\/b>, 390\u2013402 (2016).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Roeloffzen, C. G. H. et al. Low-loss Si3N4 TriPleX optical waveguides: technology and applications overview. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24<\/b>, 4400321 (2018).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dietrich, C. P., Fiore, A., Thompson, M. G., Kamp, M. & H\u00f6fling, S. GaAs integrated quantum photonics: towards compact and multi-functional quantum photonic integrated circuits. Laser Photonics Rev. 10<\/b>, 870\u2013894 (2016).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lukin, D. M., Guidry, M. A. & Vuckovic, J. Integrated quantum photonics with silicon carbide: challenges and prospects. PRX Quantum 1<\/b>, 020102 (2020).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meany, T. et al. Laser written circuits for quantum photonics. Laser Photonics Rev. 9<\/b>, 363\u2013384 (2015).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhu, D. et al. Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13<\/b>, 242\u2013352 (2021).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gol\u2019tsman, G. N. et al. Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79<\/b>, 705\u2013707 (2001).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rosfjord, K. M. et al. Nanowire single-photon detector with an integrated optical cavity and anti-reflection coating. Opt. Express 14<\/b>, 527\u2013534 (2001).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Reddy, D. V., Nerem, R. R., Nam, S. W., Mirin, R. P. & Verma, V. B. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550\u2009nm. Optica 7<\/b>, 1649\u20131653 (2020).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Korzh, B. et al. Demonstration of sub-3\u2009ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Nat. Photon. 14<\/b>, 250\u2013255 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andrews, D. H., Brucksch, W. F. Jr., Ziegler, W. T. & Blanchard, E. R. Attenuated superconductors I. For measuring infra-red radiation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 13<\/b>, 281\u2013292 (1942).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lita, A. E., Miller, A. J. & Nam, S. W. Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency. Opt. Express 16<\/b>, 3032\u20133040 (2008).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schuck, C., Pernice, W. H. P. & Tang, H. X. Waveguide integrated low noise NbTiN nanowire single-photon detectors with milli-Hz dark count rate. Sci. Rep. 3<\/b>, 1893 (2013).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sahin, D. et al. Waveguide photon-number-resolving detectors for quantum photonic integrated circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103<\/b>, 111116 (2013).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    H\u00f6pker, J. P. et al. Integrated transition edge sensors on titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides. APL Photonics 4<\/b>, 056103 (2019).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pernice, W. H. P. et al. High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 3<\/b>, 1325 (2012).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cheng, R. et al. A 100-pixel photon-number-resolving detector unveiling photon statistics. Nat. Photon. 17<\/b>, 112\u2013119 (2023).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In International Conference on Computers, Systems & Signal Processing 175\u2013179 (Theoretical Computer Science, 1984).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell\u2019s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67<\/b>, 661\u2013663 (1991).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bennett, C. H. et al. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein\u2013Podolsky\u2013Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70<\/b>, 1895\u20131899 (1993).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Experimental quantum cryptography: the dawn of a new era for quantum cryptography: the experimental prototype is working. ACM SIGACT News 20<\/b>, 78\u201380 (1989).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, X.-B. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94<\/b>, 230503 (2005).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lo, H.-K., Ma, X. & Chen, K. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94<\/b>, 230504 (2005).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Boaron, A. et al. Secure quantum key distribution over 421\u2009km of optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121<\/b>, 190502 (2018).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, Y.-A. et al. An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres. Nature 589<\/b>, 214\u2013219 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lo, H.-K., Curty, M. & Qi, B. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108<\/b>, 130503 (2012).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yin, H.-L. et al. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over a 404\u2009km optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117<\/b>, 190501 (2016).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F. & Shields, A. J. Overcoming the rate\u2013distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature 557<\/b>, 400\u2013403 (2018).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, S. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre. Nat. Photon. 16<\/b>, 154\u2013161 (2022).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, J.-P. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over a 511\u2009km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas. Nat. Photon. 15<\/b>, 570\u2013575 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pittaluga, M. et al. Long-distance coherent quantum communications in deployed telecom networks. Nature 640<\/b>, 911\u2013917 (2025).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Grosshans, F. & Grangier, P. Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88<\/b>, 057902 (2002).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Weedbrook, C. et al. Quantum cryptography without switching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93<\/b>, 170504 (2004).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, Y. et al. Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 202.81\u2009km of fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125<\/b>, 010502 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wootters, W. K. & Zurek, W. H. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299<\/b>, 802\u2013803 (1982).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Briegel, H.-J., D\u00fcr, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81<\/b>, 5932\u20135935 (1998).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature 414<\/b>, 413\u2013418 (2001).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80<\/b>, 3891\u20133894 (1998).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526<\/b>, 682\u2013686 (2015).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yu, Y. et al. Entanglement of two quantum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres. Nature 578<\/b>, 240\u2013245 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bhaskar, M. K. et al. Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication. Nature 580<\/b>, 60\u201364 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liu, J.-L. et al. Creation of memory\u2013memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network. Nature 629<\/b>, 579\u2013585 (2024).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Knaut, C. M. et al. Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network. Nature 629<\/b>, 573\u2013578 (2024).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stolk, A. J. et al. Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits. Sci. Adv. 10<\/b>, eadp6442 (2024).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Liao, S.-K. et al. Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature 549<\/b>, 43\u201347 (2017).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yin, J. et al. Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers. Science 356<\/b>, 1140\u20131144 (2017).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yin, J. et al. Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres. Nature 582<\/b>, 501\u2013505 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ren, J.-G. et al. Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation. Nature 549<\/b>, 70\u201373 (2017).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lu, C.-Y., Browne, D. E., Yang, T. & Pan, J.-W. Demonstration of a compiled version of Shor\u2019s quantum factoring algorithm using photonic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99<\/b>, 250504 (2007).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lanyon, B. P. et al. Experimental demonstration of a compiled version of Shor\u2019s algorithm with quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99<\/b>, 250505 (2007).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Peruzzo, A. et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 5<\/b>, 4213 (2014).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Milburn, G. J. A quantum Fredkin gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62<\/b>, 2124\u20132127 (1989).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nielsen, M. A. Optical quantum computation using cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93<\/b>, 040503 (2004).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L. & Nielsen, M. A. Noise thresholds for optical quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96<\/b>, 020501 (2006).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rudolph, T. Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing. APL Photonics 2<\/b>, 030901 (2017).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carolan, J. et al. Universal linear optics. Science 349<\/b>, 711\u2013716 (2015).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Qiang, X. et al. Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nat. Photon. 12<\/b>, 534\u2013539 (2018).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mennea, P. et al. Modular linear optical circuits. Optica 5<\/b>, 1087\u20131094 (2018).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meyer-Scott, E. et al. Scalable generation of multiphoton entangled states by active feed-forward and multiplexing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129<\/b>, 150501 (2022).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sch\u00f6n, C., Solano, E., Verstraete, F., Cirac, J. I. & Wolf, M. M. Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95<\/b>, 110503 (2005).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Economou, S. E., Lindner, N. H. & Rudolph, T. Optically generated 2-dimensional photonic cluster state from coupled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105<\/b>, 093601 (2010).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gimeno-Segovia, M., Rudolph, T. & Economou, S. E. Deterministic generation of large-scale entangled photonic cluster state from interacting solid state emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123<\/b>, 070501 (2019).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schwartz, I. et al. Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons. Science 354<\/b>, 434\u2013437 (2016).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cogan, D., Su, Z.-E., Kenneth, O. & Gershoni, D. Deterministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state. Nat. Photon. 17<\/b>, 324\u2013329 (2023).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Coste, N. et al. High-rate entanglement between a semiconductor spin and indistinguishable photons. Nat. Photon. 17<\/b>, 582\u2013587 (2023).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, C.-W. et al. Highly efficient multiphoton generation with photon-number-resolving detectors. Nat. Photon. 16<\/b>, 658\u2013661 (2022).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom. Nature 608<\/b>, 677\u2013681 (2022).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Fusion of deterministically generated photonic graph states. Nature 629<\/b>, 567\u2013572 (2024).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hacker, B., Welte, S., Rempe, G. & Ritter, S. A photon\u2013photon quantum gate based on a single atom in an optical resonator. Nature 536<\/b>, 193\u2013196 (2016).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hastrup, J. & Andersen, U. L. Protocol for generating optical Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill states with cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128<\/b>, 170503 (2022).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Menicucci, N. C. et al. Universal quantum computation with continuous-variable cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97<\/b>, 110501 (2006).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Menicucci, N. C. Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112<\/b>, 120504 (2014).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Menicucci, N. C., Ma, X. & Ralph, T. C. Arbitrarily large continuous-variable cluster states from a single quantum nondemolition gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104<\/b>, 250503 (2010).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yokoyama, S. et al. Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain. Nat. Photon. 7<\/b>, 982\u2013986 (2013).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Asavanant, W. et al. Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366<\/b>, 373\u2013376 (2019).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Larsen, M. V., Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. & Andersen, U. L. Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366<\/b>, 369\u2013372 (2019).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Larsen, M. V., Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. & Andersen, U. L. Deterministic multi-mode gates on a scalable photonic quantum computing platform. Nat. Phys. 17<\/b>, 1018\u20131023 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A. & Preskill, J. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 64<\/b>, 012310 (2001).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Konno, S. et al. Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light. Science 383<\/b>, 289\u2013293 (2024).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ourjoumtsev, A., Jeong, H., Tualle-Brouri, R. & Grangier, P. Generation of optical \u2018Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019 cats from photon number states. Nature 448<\/b>, 784\u2013786 (2007).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Aaronson, S. & Arkhipov, A. The computational complexity of linear optics. Theory Comput. 9<\/b>, 143\u2013252 (2013).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lund, A. et al. Boson sampling from a Gaussian state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113<\/b>, 100502 (2014).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hamilton, C. S. et al. Gaussian boson sampling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119<\/b>, 170501 (2017).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Broome, M. A. et al. Photonic boson sampling in a tunable circuit. Science 339<\/b>, 794\u2013798 (2013).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Spring, J. B. et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 339<\/b>, 798\u2013801 (2013).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Crespi, A. et al. Integrated multimode interferometers with arbitrary designs for photonic boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 7<\/b>, 545\u2013549 (2013).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tillmann, M. et al. Experimental boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 7<\/b>, 540\u2013544 (2013).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, H. et al. High-efficiency multiphoton boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 11<\/b>, 361\u2013365 (2017).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhong, H.-S. et al. Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science 370<\/b>, 1460\u20131463 (2020).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhong, H.-S. et al. Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127<\/b>, 180502 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Deng, Y.-H. et al. Gaussian boson sampling with pseudo-photon-number resolving detectors and quantum computational advantage. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131<\/b>, 150601 (2023).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606<\/b>, 75\u201381 (2022).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23<\/b>, 1693\u20131708 (1981).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Abbott, R. et al. GWTC-2: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. X 11<\/b>, 021053 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Abbott, R. et al. GWTC-3: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. X 13<\/b>, 041039 (2021).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lough, J. et al. First demonstration of 6\u2009dB quantum noise reduction in a kilometer scale gravitational wave observatory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126<\/b>, 041102 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cheng, J.-X. & Xie, X. S. Vibrational spectroscopic imaging of living systems: an emerging platform for biology and medicine. Science 350<\/b>, aaa8870 (2015).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wei, L. et al. Super-multiplex vibrational imaging. Nature 544<\/b>, 465\u2013470 (2017).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Casacio, C. A. et al. Quantum-enhanced nonlinear microscopy. Nature 594<\/b>, 201\u2013206 (2021).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Weston, M. M. et al. Efficient and pure femtosecond-pulse-length source of polarization-entangled photons. Opt. Express 24<\/b>, 10869\u201310879 (2016).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kaneda, F., Garay-Palmett, K., U\u2019Ren, A. B. & Kwiat, P. G. Heralded single-photon source utilizing highly nondegenerate, spectrally factorable spontaneous parametric down conversion. Opt. Express 24<\/b>, 10733\u201310747 (2016).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ma, X.-s., Zotter, S., Kofler, J., Jennewein, T. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental generation of single photons via active multiplexing. Phys. Rev. A 83<\/b>, 043814 (2011).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kaneda, F. et al. Time-multiplexed heralded single-photon source. Optica 2<\/b>, 1010\u20131013 (2015).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Joshi, C., Farsi, A., Clemmen, S., Ramelow, S. & Gaeta, A. L. Frequency multiplexing for quasi-deterministic heralded single-photon sources. Nat. Commun. 9<\/b>, 847 (2018).<\/p>\n

    PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ralph, T. C., Hayes, A. J. F. & Gilchrist, A. Loss-tolerant optical qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95<\/b>, 100501 (2005).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ralph, T. C., Gilchrist, A., Milburn, G. J., Munro, W. J. & Glancy, S. Quantum computation with coherent optical states. Phys. Rev. A 68<\/b>, 042319 (2003).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zurek, W. H. Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence. Nature 412<\/b>, 712\u2013717 (2001).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Dowling, J. P. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys.…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":148884,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[26985,2270,834,19533,26986,26984,492,13632,5649,159,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-148883","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-biomaterials","9":"tag-condensed-matter-physics","10":"tag-general","11":"tag-materials-science","12":"tag-nanotechnology","13":"tag-optical-and-electronic-materials","14":"tag-physics","15":"tag-quantum-information","16":"tag-quantum-optics","17":"tag-science","18":"tag-united-states","19":"tag-unitedstates","20":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115035034270082555","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148883\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/148884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}