{"id":149145,"date":"2025-08-16T00:17:14","date_gmt":"2025-08-16T00:17:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/149145\/"},"modified":"2025-08-16T00:17:14","modified_gmt":"2025-08-16T00:17:14","slug":"ohio-agency-denies-permit-for-browns-stadium-citing-air-traffic-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/149145\/","title":{"rendered":"Ohio agency denies permit for Browns stadium, citing air-traffic concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Browns have overcome several hurdles in their quest to leave downtown Cleveland for a new stadium in suburban Brook Park. They now have another.<\/p>\n<p>Via multiple reports, and as first reported by NEOtrans blog, the Ohio Department of Transportation has <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/neo-trans.blog\/2025\/08\/15\/new-browns-stadium-denied-odot-aviation-permit\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">rejected a building permit<\/a>, explaining that the structure is too tall.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe purpose of this letter is to notify you that your permit application concerning the proposed construction of a commercial building at the above submitted location and height has been denied for the following reason: the proposed structure has been determined to be an obstruction to air navigation,\u201d the August 1, 2025 letter states.<\/p>\n<p>The stadium, per the ODOT, exceeds the maximum height for the location by 58 feet.<\/p>\n<p>The Browns have issued a statement to multiple outlets containing their position on the issue.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur aviation consultants were surprised by ODOT\u2019s letter from two weeks ago, which is flatly at odds with the FAA\u2019s careful analyses and determinations resulting from well over a year of in-depth work, that found our proposed stadium poses no airspace hazards,\u201d a Haslam Sports Group spokesperson said. \u201cThey\u2019ve also noted several other existing structures in Ohio that exceed the height ODOT apparently now finds objectionable. . . . We\u2019ve already begun working collaboratively with ODOT to explain the stadium\u2019s heights and the detailed work we\u2019ve done more fully, which shows no safety or efficiency issues to Cleveland-Hopkins International Airport. We look forward to resolving this matter expeditiously and continuing our work to bring this transformative project to Northeast Ohio.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Browns hope to commence construction in early 2026, with the goal of christening the stadium in 2029.<\/p>\n<p>Concerns regarding football stadiums and flying aren\u2019t new. Levi\u2019s Stadium in Santa Clara has been the subject of <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcbayarea.com\/news\/local\/faa-e-mails-show-levis-stadium-lights-safety-problem-worse-than-previously-thought\/73798\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">complaints from pilots<\/a>, due to the bright lights in the venue. SoFi Stadium in Inglewood was buried <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/alsd.com\/content\/sofi-stadium-overall-building-architecture\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">100 feet into the ground<\/a>, in order to accommodate flight paths at nearby LAX.<\/p>\n<p>The new Browns stadium, as planned, will have a playing surface <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cleveland.com\/news\/2025\/08\/new-cleveland-browns-stadium-would-interfere-with-airplane-traffic-state-aviation-officials-say.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">80 feet deep<\/a>. Apparently, they may need to dig a little deeper.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Browns have overcome several hurdles in their quest to leave downtown Cleveland for a new stadium in&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":149146,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[1232,62,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-149145","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-nfl","8":"tag-nfl","9":"tag-sports","10":"tag-united-states","11":"tag-unitedstates","12":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115035573102499783","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149145"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149145\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/149146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}