{"id":159839,"date":"2025-08-20T01:24:15","date_gmt":"2025-08-20T01:24:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/159839\/"},"modified":"2025-08-20T01:24:15","modified_gmt":"2025-08-20T01:24:15","slug":"trump-in-putin-meeting-offers-russia-a-critical-piece-of-ukraine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/159839\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump, in Putin meeting, offers Russia a critical piece of Ukraine."},"content":{"rendered":"

Sign up for the Slatest<\/a> to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.<\/p>\n

When Mary Harris got Tim Mak on the phone, he was getting ready to have something of a slumber party.<\/p>\n

Mak is a reporter in Ukraine and the founder of a news organization called the Counteroffensive. He and his newsroom colleagues were staying up late because the biggest news in Ukraine was about to happen thousands of miles away in Washington\u2014a meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.<\/p>\n

\u201cI often think that Americans don\u2019t pay as close attention to American politics as Ukrainians do. And for good reason, right? Because, like, the Ukrainians are really very anxious about what\u2019s happening next,\u201d Mak said.<\/p>\n

This anxiety is understandable, to be clear. The previous White House meeting between Zelensky and Trump ended with our president and vice president taking turns berating the Ukrainian leader. This meeting came on the heels of a summit between Trump and Russia\u2019s Vladimir Putin\u2014during which Trump appeared ready to support slicing off regions of Ukraine to be absorbed by Russia, full stop.<\/p>\n

Fast-forward to Monday. Zelensky boarded a plane to try to fix this situation, as much as he could. But this time he brought a few friends<\/a> to crash the Oval Office party: the prime ministers of Italy and Britain, NATO\u2019s secretary general, the president of France, and the chancellor of Germany.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe goal is trying to just get Trump \u2026 back on the pathway towards understanding that Ukraine needs to maintain its sovereignty and maintain some level of security guarantees so that if the war ends, it will be the last time a war like this is fought on Ukrainian soil,\u201d Mak said.
On a recent episode of What Next<\/a>, Mary Harris spoke to Mak about Zelensky\u2019s White House redo, how Putin keeps playing Trump, and how Trump\u2019s proposed land giveaways could set Putin up perfectly to invade Ukraine again. This transcript has been edited and condensed for clarity.<\/p>\n

Mary Harris: The main thing to come out of the Trump\u2013Putin meeting appeared to be this change in position, where Trump seemed in favor not of a ceasefire but of a permanent peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. Why is that important? Why is the difference important?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tim Mak:<\/strong> I wouldn\u2019t merely characterize it as a change in position. I would say that that\u2019s the adoption of the Russian position. It seems to be pretty disingenuous to me: They say that the war will end when they\u2019ve dealt with all the root causes of the war. And they have a laundry list of reasons that they believe they were \u201cforced\u201d\u2014and you\u2019ll sense the sarcasm in my voice\u2014to invade Ukraine. These mostly imaginary root causes cannot be addressed. And so they\u2019re trying to, as much as possible, drive a wedge between Ukraine and what should be Ukraine\u2019s closest ally in the United States\u2014and take advantage of the situation politically.<\/p>\n

Is it a play for time? To drag this out so that Russia can take more land, inch by inch? <\/strong><\/p>\n

That is one of the potential outcomes. But all of the possible outcomes in this direction, whether it is some peace deal that\u2019s incredibly favorable toward Russia, or a huge break between Europe, Zelensky, and Trump, or the capture of additional territory on the battlefield through a grind-it-out method\u2014all of those options are good for Vladimir Putin. The reason why Ukraine and Europe and Trump (until recently) were trying to demand a ceasefire as a precondition to peace negotiations is that it would actually show that Putin is serious about negotiating. Putin can continue to be unserious about negotiating\u2014maybe serious if he gets a ridiculous deal that he can\u2019t turn down, but otherwise pursue any sort of action that he wants. And that\u2019s why he wanted this: It preserves all of his options while demanding nothing of him in return.<\/p>\n

Trump also seemed to now be in favor of Ukraine giving up land, land that Russia hasn\u2019t even taken yet.<\/strong><\/p>\n

It would be a mistake to think of this just as giving up territory or random parts on a map. The particular area that Putin is asking for is this area in Donetsk, which contains a vital fortification line called the Fortress Belt, which has kept Ukraine safe over the past 11 years of war. Putin taking this territory is not just a ploy for gaining additional space on a map\u2014it\u2019s so that, should he want to attack again in, let\u2019s say, a year or two or three, he would be able to do so on the other side of a vital entrenchment line that has been able to keep the Russians at bay until now. So it\u2019s not just a matter of territory. It\u2019s a matter of strategic positioning.<\/p>\n

Trump has also always been opposed to NATO membership for Ukraine, a goal that is important to Ukraine. Instead, there\u2019s this talk about security guarantees directly from the United States. So instead of having NATO as the people who would come to Ukraine\u2019s defense, if Russia stepped over the line or tried to take additional land, you would just have the U.S. intervening. What do you make of this idea?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Regarding security guarantees, from the Ukrainian perspective, in 1994, when Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons stockpile, the U.S. promised to do what it could to maintain Ukraine\u2019s territorial integrity and sovereignty. From the Ukrainian perspective, the Americans have already made a promise\u2014and they haven\u2019t kept it, at least not to the extent that Ukrainians believe they ought to.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n Fred Kaplan
\n Bad News for Trump\u2019s Nobel Peace Prize Ambitions
\n Read More<\/b>\n <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

It also seems to me like this one-to-one promise of the U.S. defending Ukraine, it\u2019s so reliant on the U.S. keeping its word. And with Trump changing his mind about Ukraine and Putin again and again, I don\u2019t know what that promise is worth if I\u2019m Ukrainian.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We\u2019ve seen a lot of these sorts of deals in the past fall through. If it\u2019s not enshrined in law or in a treaty, and it\u2019s just a government-to-government agreement, then if the government changes, it could be swiftly rescinded. So if Trump makes an agreement today, his successor could decide not to enforce it, or Trump could decide not to enforce it. And so it\u2019s really shaky grounds on which to base the future of your country\u2019s existence, which is what Ukraine is dealing with right now.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n <\/p>\n

    YouTube Pranksters Thought a Netanyahu Interview Would Be Good for Business. Then Something Surprising Happened.
    \n <\/a>\n <\/li>\n

  2. \n
    \n This Content is Available for Slate Plus members only<\/p>\n

    I Used to Think Adoption Was a Win-Win-Win Scenario. Here\u2019s What Changed My Mind.
    \n <\/a>\n <\/li>\n

  3. \n <\/p>\n

    James Baldwin\u2019s Famous Showdown with RFK Was No Accident
    \n <\/a>\n <\/li>\n

  4. \n
    \n This Content is Available for Slate Plus members only<\/p>\n

    How Can Democrats Win Back the Working Class? I Have an Idea.
    \n <\/a>\n <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Trump did say he was going to speak to Putin after his meetings Monday. He said, actually, that Putin was expecting his call. Do you think that means we\u2019re any closer to an end to this war than we were a week ago, a month ago?<\/strong><\/p>\n

    I\u2019d love to see it. I think that an end to the war would be a great first step toward justice for all the people who have been traumatized, whose lives have been ruined as a result of the war, to say nothing of the people who have died in this war. But I need to stress that I\u2019ve seen no actual steps, any concrete steps, taken toward peace yet. We\u2019re talking about talking at this moment.<\/p>\n

    I mean, Russia has promised, in 1994, in the 2000s, in the 2010s, that it would not violate Ukraine\u2019s territorial integrity and sovereignty. And it has violated all of those promises and invaded and killed tens of thousands of people, wounded many more, destroyed or disrupted the lives of millions of Ukrainians. And so there\u2019s no reason why the Ukrainians would be willing to take the Russian government at its word. The only way it would sign a deal is if it had commitments, rock-solid commitments from other countries to back it up should Ukraine be invaded again.<\/p>\n

    <\/p>\n

    Sign up for Slate’s evening newsletter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":159840,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[69,3350,50,257,273,274,103],"class_list":{"0":"post-159839","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-world","8":"tag-donald-trump","9":"tag-foreign-policy","10":"tag-news","11":"tag-russia","12":"tag-ukraine","13":"tag-vladimir-putin","14":"tag-world"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115058485901209768","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159839"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159839\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/159840"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}