{"id":172698,"date":"2025-08-24T21:45:46","date_gmt":"2025-08-24T21:45:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/172698\/"},"modified":"2025-08-24T21:45:46","modified_gmt":"2025-08-24T21:45:46","slug":"long-trusted-nonprofit-sells-its-independence-to-amtrak-casting-doubt-on-penn-station-views","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/172698\/","title":{"rendered":"Long-trusted nonprofit sells its independence to Amtrak, casting doubt on Penn Station views"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The nonprofit <a href=\"https:\/\/rpa.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Regional Plan Association<\/a>, long considered a reliable, independent and objective voice \u2014 has taken upwards of a million dollars in federal tax money from Amtrak to promote the railway\u2019s Gateway project $50 billion boondoggle, casting anything the group has to say about the future of Penn Station and Gateway in doubt.<\/p>\n<p>The infusion from Amtrak \u2014 which we are reporting publicly here for the first time \u2014 undermines RPA\u2019s role in helping frame critical debates around land use, transportation, environment and governance. On the controversial fight over Penn and Gateway, the group\u2019s research and reports and statements cannot be trusted by the public and policy makers as critical questions about the future of the area are weighed.<\/p>\n<p>What should happen with Penn Station and Madison Square Garden? Should the alignment of the new Hudson tunnel be an inefficient separate and parallel one to the existing 1910 tunnel or should it be a much smarter straddling of the old line? Does the new tunnel need expensive and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/2025\/05\/06\/amtraks-bench-wall-baloney\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">outdated technology like bench walls<\/a>? Why not fix the 1910 tunnel immediately using the proven repair in place method of nights and weekends? We have urged more efficient and effective steps and every time RPA adheres to Amtrak\u2019s extravagant plans. Taking Amtrak\u2019s money means RPA cannot be reliable, independent or objective.<\/p>\n<p>As this <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/2016\/05\/29\/tunnel-blockheads-dig-the-gateway-tunnels-first-before-messing-with-any-new-train-station\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">editorial page has documented for years<\/a>, Gateway is a boondoggle because it vastly overbuilds a new passenger rail connection under the Hudson. Tens of billions in taxpayer funds would be wasted, with the biggest and most wasteful component being the planned demolition of a large swatch of Midtown south of Penn Station, centered on Block 780.<\/p>\n<p>Gov. Hochul is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/2025\/03\/23\/hochul-saves-nyc-penn-station\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">correctly flat-out opposed to the Block 780 foolishness<\/a> (which would destroy a neighborhood and cost close to $20 billion), but RPA, after taking Amtrak\u2019s money, is sticking with Amtrak.<\/p>\n<p>RPA\u2019s paid relationship has been going on for years as Gateway has been debated in Washington, on both sides of the Hudson and in these pages and through it all RPA has been cheering the maximalist position held by Amtrak, such as Block 780.<\/p>\n<p>Which explains why RPA poo poos anything that deviates from Amtrak\u2019s grand scheme, like the much smarter <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rethinknyc.org\/through-running\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">alternative of through-running of trains in one side and out the other side of Penn<\/a> instead of a dead-end terminal like 780 would be. Now we know why.<\/p>\n<p>The financial arrangement only came to our attention in the most recent <a href=\"https:\/\/s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/rpa-org\/pdfs\/FY2023-Form-990.pdf#page=5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">IRS 990 tax filing for nonprofits on the RPA website<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the info as submitted by RPA: \u201cBuild Gateway Now Coalition \u2013 RPA launched the Build Gateway Now Coalition five years ago, bringing together over 40 civic, business and labor partners to support the nation\u2019s most critical infrastructure project: the Gateway Program. Through original research, communication efforts (social media, op\/eds, digital public engagement tools, regular contact with the media), advocacy efforts (testifying at Gateway Development Commission board meetings, lobbying in Washington DC, hosting press conferences and other rallies), our coalition has helped move the project along and made it clear in the public eye that the Gateway Program must be built. Our work is supported by Amtrak. We received a $350,000 grant for 18 months starting January 2022. Our grant was recently renewed and increased by $500,000 for 18 months\u201d<\/p>\n<p>RPA\u2019s 990 also says that it is \u201cAmerica\u2019s oldest and most distinguished independent urban research and advocacy group.\u201d It\u2019s not so independent any more.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, there is this on the LinkedIn profile of an Amtrak public relations executive:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cManage approx. $1 million contract with the Regional Plan Association (RPA) to operate the Build Gateway Now Coalition, including original scholarly research illustrating the need for and benefits of the Gateway Program.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>We asked both RPA and Amtrak for the contract and both declined to provide it, Amtrak saying that we should submit a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amtrak.com\/foia\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Freedom of Information Act request<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>For this congressionally appropriated money Amtrak has purchased the reputation of RPA. RPA President and CEO Tom Wright tells us that RPA\u2019s support for a new rail tunnel goes back decades and RPA has not changed its stand at all. That is correct, but by accepting payment from Amtrak, RPA shifted from being an independent advocate to being a paid lobbyist.<\/p>\n<p>Amtrak selected Wright to lead the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amtrak.com\/content\/dam\/projects\/dotcom\/english\/public\/documents\/ny-penn-station-working-advisory-group\/penn-working-advisory-group-meeting-summary-011625.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Penn Station Working Advisory Group<\/a>, which means that Amtrak has selected someone who they are treating as their own paid lobbyist.<\/p>\n<p>Amtrak said only: \u201cAmtrak collaborates with a variety of partners on several projects across the country. We will continue to work with partners who share our commitment to safety, efficiency, and reliability, while making the best use of taxpayer investments.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There have been 24 meetings of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gatewayprogram.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">bistate Gateway Development Commission<\/a> since 2022, when the Amtrak contract with RPA began.<\/p>\n<p>RPA had a person <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gatewayprogram.org\/board-meetings-3.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">appearing at each of those meetings<\/a> to speak during the public comment portion to extoll the Gateway project and cheer it on, never once disclosing the fact that Amtrak was paying. We put our questions to RPA on Monday and at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gatewayprogram.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/August-20-2025-Public-Comment-for-website.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Wednesday\u2019s GDC meeting<\/a> there was no public comment from RPA. We wonder why not.<\/p>\n<p>Originally Published: August 24, 2025 at 4:00 AM EDT<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The nonprofit Regional Plan Association, long considered a reliable, independent and objective voice \u2014 has taken upwards of&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":172699,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[5229,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,1269,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-172698","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-new-york","10":"tag-new-york-city","11":"tag-newyork","12":"tag-newyorkcity","13":"tag-ny","14":"tag-nyc","15":"tag-opinion","16":"tag-united-states","17":"tag-united-states-of-america","18":"tag-unitedstates","19":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","20":"tag-us","21":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115085941552313882","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=172698"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172698\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=172698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=172698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=172698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}