{"id":174332,"date":"2025-08-25T12:43:11","date_gmt":"2025-08-25T12:43:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/174332\/"},"modified":"2025-08-25T12:43:11","modified_gmt":"2025-08-25T12:43:11","slug":"san-diego-is-suing-a-growing-number-of-residents-businesses-and-victims-over-2024-flooding-san-diego-union-tribune","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/174332\/","title":{"rendered":"San Diego is suing a growing number of residents, businesses and victims over 2024 flooding \u2013 San Diego Union-Tribune"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The question of who bears responsibility for the damage from catastrophic flooding in January 2024 continues to play out in complex litigation \u2014 with the city of San Diego continuing to argue that local residents and companies should have done more to maintain storm channels.<\/p>\n<p>The city has now filed more than 20 cross-complaints against more than a dozen parties, including at least two flood victims, maintaining that they were responsible for drainage on their properties or took steps that could have increased storm runoff.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese third parties either own, maintain or control private drainage facilities that connect into the city\u2019s infrastructure or they have otherwise obstructed the city\u2019s facilities or developed their property in such a way as to overwhelm the city\u2019s existing infrastructure,\u201d the City Attorney\u2019s Office said.<\/p>\n<p>The accusations come in response to a wave of litigation that the city of San Diego in particular has faced from hundreds of people ever since stormwater overwhelmed city infrastructure early last year.<\/p>\n<p>More than 1,500 people are suing the city in 53 lawsuits, saying <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2024\/05\/08\/hundreds-of-people-sue-san-diego-over-january-floods-saying-it-absolutely-failed-to-manage-stormwater\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">its failure to maintain<\/a> its storm channels led to the catastrophic flooding that displaced thousands, mainly in underserved neighborhoods in the Chollas Creek watershed. Many people are still rebuilding.<\/p>\n<p>In May, the La Mesa-Spring Valley School District also filed a cross-complaint against two residents and the County of San Diego, alleging they are liable for flood damage.<\/p>\n<p>A cross-complaint is a way for the city to initiate its own claim against parties it considers at least partly responsible for the flood damage \u2014 and that it believes should have to bear liability financially.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the city has any liability, they want to be able to get some contribution from a codefendant,\u201d explained William Slomanson, a retired professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and a retired defense attorney.<\/p>\n<p>In five of the cross-complaints filed from May through July, the city sued several of the same parties \u2014 including two flood victims who own homes\u00a0in the community of Southcrest.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\" lazyautosizes lazyload\" alt=\"On Wednesday, January 24, 2024, residents of Beta Street begin the cleanup after their homes flooded two days earlier. (Nelvin C. Cepeda \/ The San Diego Union-Tribune)\" width=\"5272\" data- src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/SU-L-cleanup-folo_NCC-007.jpg\" data-attachment-id=\"9191486\" \/>On Wednesday, January 24, 2024, residents of Beta Street begin the cleanup after their homes flooded two days earlier.  (Nelvin C. Cepeda \/ The San Diego Union-Tribune)<\/p>\n<p>Evan Walker, one of the lawyers representing flood victims suing the city, questions the city\u2019s strategy of suing flood victims \u2014 especially multiple times over.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t think it was necessary or even appropriate,\u201d he said, adding that even if a flood victim did something to contribute to the damage, a lawsuit doesn\u2019t seem like a reasonable course of action.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cJust tell him you\u2019re not going to pay him a hundred\u00a0grand; tell him you\u2019re gonna pay him 50,\u201d Walker said. \u201cDon\u2019t sue him.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Along with the flood victims, the city is also cross-suing Home Depot, which owns a property in the Mountain View neighborhood, along with a homeowners association in Southcrest.<\/p>\n<p>Other cross-defendants include a real estate developer and a construction company that contracted with the city for work on the\u00a0Clay Avenue Mini Park in Logan Heights.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to the parties it names as defendants, the city\u2019s cross-complaints also list up to\u00a01,000 unidentified defendants \u2014 people or entities that could also be responsible.<\/p>\n<p>It has so far named four of those defendants in one of the cross-suits. The City Attorney\u2019s Office said last month it doesn\u2019t expect to name all 1,000.<\/p>\n<p>The City Attorney\u2019s Office did not comment on its legal strategy.<\/p>\n<p>But to Slomanson, it looks standard \u2014\u00a0including its decision earlier this year to try to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2025\/03\/02\/in-spate-of-lawsuits-over-january-2024-floods-judge-oks-most-claims-against-city-to-proceed\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reduce the number of claims<\/a> against it over its management of stormwater infrastructure in southeastern San Diego. In that lawsuit, a Vista judge ruled in March that only one claim would be thrown out and five would proceed for now.<\/p>\n<p>Walker said that the plaintiffs\u2019 lawyers have until Sept. 12 to consolidate all 53 complaints into a single master complaint, with a status conference with the judge set for Sept. 18.<\/p>\n<p>Then he says the case could go to trial by next summer, barring a settlement before then.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\" lazyautosizes lazyload\" alt=\"Martha Navarro recalls when she first saw the flood by watching remotely on her security camera and noticed her puppy nearly drowning on the back porch of her home on Beta Street in Southcrest in January 2024. (Nelvin C. Cepeda \/ The San Diego Union-Tribune)\" width=\"4200\" data- src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/sut-l-floodyearroundup-004.jpg\" data-attachment-id=\"9191501\" \/>Martha Navarro recalls when she first saw the flood by watching remotely on her security camera and noticed her puppy nearly drowning on the back porch of her home on Beta Street in Southcrest in January 2024. (Nelvin C. Cepeda \/ The San Diego Union-Tribune)<\/p>\n<p>Martha Navarro, a Beta Street resident who is suing the city and has not been named as a cross-defendant, expects the case to take years to reach a resolution.<\/p>\n<p>Still, she\u2019ll be glad when it\u2019s over \u2014 with the hope of getting money from the city to cover the damage her home sustained during the floods. Navarro and her husband spent $20,000 to $25,000 last year to replace their family\u2019s damaged appliances and belongings.<\/p>\n<p>The Navarros are first-time homeowners at their Southcrest home with two young sons, but she and her husband are talking about using money from the lawsuit for a down payment on a new house in another neighborhood to avoid a future flood.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe still have little ones,\u201d she said. \u201cIf it happens again, I wouldn\u2019t want to be in the house with my kids.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The question of who bears responsibility for the damage from catastrophic flooding in January 2024 continues to play&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":174333,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5134],"tags":[5229,1582,276,356,728,50,3549,7264,7289,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-174332","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-san-diego","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-ca","10":"tag-california","11":"tag-courts","12":"tag-local-news","13":"tag-news","14":"tag-san-diego","15":"tag-sandiego","16":"tag-top-stories-sdut","17":"tag-united-states","18":"tag-united-states-of-america","19":"tag-unitedstates","20":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","21":"tag-us","22":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115089467236447192","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174332"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174332\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/174333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}