On Monday, state Republicans filed a second petition to the state Supreme Court<\/a> seeking to block the redistricting effort, after the first one failed<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n The plan, if it succeeds, will put \u201cSan Diego\u2019s only Republican held district in play as a political battleground in 2026,\u201d said Thad Kousser, a political science professor at the University of California, San Diego.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cSan Diego\u2019s often been a microcosm for the politics of California, and in this way, it will still be a microcosm,\u201d Kousser said.\u00a0<\/p>\n Proposition 50, if passed in the special election, would change the partisan balance of two districts in San Diego. Republican Rep. Darrell Issa\u2019s District 48 would expand to include Palm Springs, Escondido and San Marcos while removing a large chunk of red East County including Poway.\u00a0<\/p>\n It would also make other districts in the area less competitive, like Democratic Rep. Dave Min\u2019s District 47, which would include Long Beach.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cSan Diego is blue-tinted, but there\u2019s still many Republicans in San Diego and across the state of California. This district and these new maps would mean they have a much smaller chance of electing members of Congress who would voice their concerns and their perspectives in Washington,\u201d Kousser said.<\/p>\n Newsom\u2019s push to redraw congressional district lines is in retaliation to plans in Texas to redraw congressional district lines to add five Republican seats. California will only complete the redistricting if Texas or another state goes forward with their own.<\/p>\n What is gerrymandering?<\/p>\n Gerrymandering is when politicians draw voting district lines in a way that gives their party an advantage<\/a>. They might group large numbers of the other party\u2019s voters into a few districts (\u201cpacking\u201d) or spread them thinly across many districts (\u201ccracking\u201d), making it harder for those voters to elect representatives. Supreme Court cases in the last decade have allowed for partisan gerrymandering, ruling that such claims can\u2019t be challenged in court. To prevent this, California voters created an independent commission so that regular citizens, not politicians, draw district boundaries.\u00a0<\/p>\n The house of representatives currently has 219 Republicans and 212 Democrats, a balance that could shift when all seats go up for reelection in 2026.\u00a0<\/p>\n Kousser said that \u201cRepublicans barely won the overall vote and barely control Congress. President Trump sought to disrupt this symmetry by urging a mid-decade redistricting in Texas and other states that would deliver more Republican seats than there are votes. And California leaders are countering.\u201d<\/p>\n Newsom said<\/a> the special election will give voters a chance to \u201cfight back\u201d against the Trump administration, which has uniquely targeted California.<\/p>\n Newsom called on Republicans to call off the plan in a letter to the Trump administration<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThis attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy,\u201d he said. \u201cBut if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same.\u201d<\/p>\n The chair of the Republican Party in San Diego Paula Whitsell said that the redrawn maps will make it difficult for Republicans to win District 48 in San Diego and any seat in the state of California.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThis is clearly a play by governor Gavin Newsom to do an end run around the voters. Clearly the wish of the voters doesn\u2019t mean much because they voted twice to have an independent commission. So it\u2019s not like their desire hasn\u2019t been made perfectly clear. They don\u2019t want politicians drawing these lines.\u201d<\/p>\n Texas politicians came up with the proposal at President Trump\u2019s request<\/a>, and he has pressured<\/a> other red states to do the same. <\/p>\n How we are covering the Trump administration<\/p>\n inewsource is reporting on the impacts of the Trump administration budget and federal funding cuts in San Diego. Has your organization or one you know lost funding? Have a tip and want to talk with a reporter? We want to hear from you.<\/p>\n The redistricting showdown between Texas and California is the latest episode in a partisan rivalry that started at the beginning of the 2000s, said Ken Miller, Director of the Rose Institute of State and Local Government at Claremont McKenna College.\u00a0<\/p>\n At the time, California became overwhelmingly Democratic and Texas Republican, whereas previously they were more politically aligned.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cWhen that happened, the two states became leaders of Red and Blue America, and political rivals,\u201d he said. \u201cThe measure will test whether California\u2019s commitment to good government reform, which is part of the state\u2019s political culture, will be overwhelmed by its powerful anti-Trump sentiment.\u201d<\/p>\n How will the special election work?<\/p>\n On November 4, California will hold a special election alongside municipal elections, with Proposition 50 being the sole special election ballot measure. It will need a simple majority<\/a> to pass. The new districts will be used in the upcoming 2026 congressional elections, with primaries starting in June.\u00a0<\/p>\n A San Diego Registrar of Voters spokesperson told inewsource that the county is prepared to handle the statewide special election, but officials are still determining the cost to the county and the impact on voters whose district would change. Nearby Riverside County<\/a> estimated that the special election would cost it up to $16 million.\u00a0<\/p>\n The last time there was a special election<\/a> was an unsuccessful 2021 attempt to remove Newsom as governor that cost the state about $200 million.\u00a0<\/p>\n Redistricting in California<\/p>\n If passed, Proposition 50 would be a temporary reversal of the 2008 state constitutional amendment that set up an independent bipartisan commission to draw state and federal district lines approved by California voters. The last two new maps were drawn by the commission.\u00a0<\/p>\n Across the country and in California, redistricting generally occurs at the end of each decade in response to the census. Mid-decade redistricting is uncommon. In California, the redistricting would only be in effect through 2030, when the independent commission would take charge again.<\/p>\n This isn\u2019t the first time California politicians have tried to put partisan gerrymandering on the ballot in a special election. In 1983, a few years after Californians shot down a measure to allow an independent commission to set the district lines, Republican Gov. George Deukmejian tried to call a special election<\/a> to redistrict California as a response to maps drawn in favor of Democrats. The initiative was shot down by the state Supreme Court<\/a>, which called it a \u201cnovel\u201d attempt in the history of the state.\u00a0<\/p>\n Matt Barretto, a professor of political science at UCLA, said there should be no legal obstacles this time since a U.S. Supreme Court decision cleared gerrymandering on partisan lines.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s unfair to California to allow states like Texas and Florida to have extreme partisan gerrymandering, and then California and Washington and other big states on the West coast are democratic and nonpartisan,\u201d he said, adding there should be a national standard for nonpartisan redistricting.\u00a0<\/p>\n Until then, he said, \u201cCalifornia should do what\u2019s in the best interest of California and not fight with one arm behind their back.\u201d<\/p>\n \t\t\tType of Content<\/p>\n News: Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.<\/p>\n News Article: Article pages that do not meet specifications for other Trust Project Type of Work labels and also do not fit within the general news category.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Why this matters San Diego\u2019s only Republican seat could be eliminated if voters approve the proposition. It could…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":177350,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5134],"tags":[5229,1582,276,14356,80,3549,7264,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-177349","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-san-diego","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-ca","10":"tag-california","11":"tag-federal-impact","12":"tag-politics","13":"tag-san-diego","14":"tag-sandiego","15":"tag-united-states","16":"tag-united-states-of-america","17":"tag-unitedstates","18":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","19":"tag-us","20":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115095786929179474","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177349","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177349"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177349\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/177350"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177349"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177349"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177349"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/d48-1.webp\")
A map showing the current district 48 overlayed with the proposition 50 boundaries. Credit: Jeremia Kimelman, CalMatters<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/d47.webp\")
A map showing the current district 47 boundaries overlayed with the proposition 50 boundary. Credit: Jeremia Kimelman, CalMatters<\/p>\n