{"id":178627,"date":"2025-08-27T02:49:18","date_gmt":"2025-08-27T02:49:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/178627\/"},"modified":"2025-08-27T02:49:18","modified_gmt":"2025-08-27T02:49:18","slug":"anthropic-settles-high-profile-ai-copyright-lawsuit-brought-by-book-authors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/178627\/","title":{"rendered":"Anthropic Settles High-Profile AI Copyright Lawsuit Brought by Book Authors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Anthropic has reached a preliminary <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.cand.434709\/gov.uscourts.cand.434709.354.0.pdf\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.cand.434709\/gov.uscourts.cand.434709.354.0.pdf&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.cand.434709\/gov.uscourts.cand.434709.354.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">settlement<\/a> in a class action lawsuit brought by a group of prominent authors, marking a major turn in of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/ai-copyright-case-tracker\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">most significant<\/a> ongoing AI copyright lawsuits in history. The move will allow Anthropic to avoid what could have been a financially devastating outcome in court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">The settlement agreement is expected to be finalized September 3, with more details to follow, according to a legal filing published on Tuesday. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Anthropic declined to comment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">In 2024, three book writers, Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson, sued Anthropic, alleging that the startup illegally used their work to train its artificial intelligence models. In June, California district court judge William Alsup <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/anthropic-ai-copyright-fair-use-piracy-ruling\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">issued a summary judgment<\/a> in Bartz v. Anthropic that largely sided with Anthropic, finding that the company\u2019s usage of the books was \u201cfair use\u201d and thus legal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">But the judge ruled that the manner in which Anthropic had acquired some of the works, by downloading them through so-called shadow libraries, including a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/new-documents-unredacted-meta-copyright-ai-lawsuit\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">notorious site<\/a> called LibGen, constituted piracy. Alsup ruled that the book authors could still take Anthropic to trial in a class action for pirating their works; the legal showdown was slated to begin in December.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Statutory damages for this kind of piracy start at $750 per infringed work, according to <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.iit.edu\/financial-aid\/policies-and-procedures\/copyright-infringement-policy\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.iit.edu\/financial-aid\/policies-and-procedures\/copyright-infringement-policy&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.iit.edu\/financial-aid\/policies-and-procedures\/copyright-infringement-policy\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">US copyright law<\/a>. Because the library of books amassed by Anthropic was thought to contain approximately 7 million works, the AI company was potentially facing court-imposed penalties amounting to billions, possibly more than $1 trillion dollars.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">\u201cIt\u2019s a stunning turn of events, given how Anthropic was fighting tooth and nail in two courts in this case. And the company recently hired a new trial team,\u201d says Edward Lee, a law professor at Santa Clara University who closely follows <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/chatgptiseatingtheworld.com\/\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/chatgptiseatingtheworld.com\/&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/chatgptiseatingtheworld.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">AI copyright litigation<\/a>. \u201cBut they had few defenses at trial, given how Judge Alsup ruled. So Anthropic was starting at the risk of statutory damages in \u2018doomsday\u2019 amounts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Most authors who may have been part of the class action were just starting to receive notice that they qualified to participate. The Authors Guild, a trade group representing professional writers, sent out <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/authorsguild.org\/news\/anthropic-ai-class-action-important-information-for-authors\/\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/authorsguild.org\/news\/anthropic-ai-class-action-important-information-for-authors\/&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/authorsguild.org\/news\/anthropic-ai-class-action-important-information-for-authors\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a notice<\/a> alerting authors that they might be eligible earlier this month, and lawyers for the plaintiffs were scheduled to submit a \u201clist of affected works\u201d to the court on September 1. This means that many of these writers were not privy to the negotiations that took place.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">\u201cThe big question is whether there is a significant revolt from within the author class after the settlement terms are unveiled,\u201d says James Grimmelmann, a professor of digital and internet law at Cornell University. \u201cThat will be a very important barometer of where copyright owner sentiment stands.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Anthropic is still facing a number of other copyright-related legal challenges. One of the most high-profile disputes involves a group of major record labels, including Universal Music Group, which allege that the company illegally trained its AI programs on copyrighted lyrics. The plaintiffs <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.musicbusinessworldwide.com\/music-publishers-allege-anthropic-used-bittorrent-to-pirate-copyrighted-lyrics\/\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.musicbusinessworldwide.com\/music-publishers-allege-anthropic-used-bittorrent-to-pirate-copyrighted-lyrics\/&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.musicbusinessworldwide.com\/music-publishers-allege-anthropic-used-bittorrent-to-pirate-copyrighted-lyrics\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">recently filed<\/a> to amend their case to allege that Anthropic had used the peer-to-peer file sharing service BitTorrent to download songs illegally.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Settlements don\u2019t set legal precedent, but the details of this case will likely be watched closely as dozens of other high-profile <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/ai-copyright-case-tracker\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AI copyright cases<\/a> continue to wind through the courts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Anthropic has reached a preliminary settlement in a class action lawsuit brought by a group of prominent authors,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":178628,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[24142,738,64,12131,25618,10001,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-178627","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business","8":"tag-anthropic","9":"tag-artificial-intelligence","10":"tag-business","11":"tag-copyright","12":"tag-intellectual-property","13":"tag-laws","14":"tag-united-states","15":"tag-unitedstates","16":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115098456139534094","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178627\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/178628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}