{"id":182327,"date":"2025-08-28T11:48:25","date_gmt":"2025-08-28T11:48:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/182327\/"},"modified":"2025-08-28T11:48:25","modified_gmt":"2025-08-28T11:48:25","slug":"with-developer-verification-android-is-becoming-something-i-dont-want","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/182327\/","title":{"rendered":"With developer verification, Android is becoming something I don’t want"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Android<\/p>\n

C. Scott Brown \/ Android Authority<\/p>\n

When I first started using a smartphone, the choice between Android and iOS<\/a> felt like an easy one. Sure, Apple had an attractive UI, and an early lead on third-party software support, but going the iPhone route meant living in Apple\u2019s walled garden. And while there are absolutely benefits to that kind of approach, it just fundamentally felt wrong to me: I viewed smartphones as the next phase of general-purpose computers, and wasn\u2019t interested in a platform locked down like a gaming console.<\/p>\n

For a while, Android felt like getting the best of both worlds. If you wanted an iPhone-like experience, you were welcome to get your apps from the Play Store<\/a> (well, Android Market in those days), and if you didn\u2019t, you were free to take matters into your own hands and install whatever software you wanted, no matter what sketchy corner of the internet it crawled out of.<\/p>\n

That kind of freedom is inherently risky. But this is also the situation computer users have been navigating since day one.<\/p>\n

Now, well into its second decade of existence, Android is changing. It\u2019s been changing for a while, to be fair, with Google making more and more Apple-like decisions, prioritizing control over the experience above user choice. Increasing reliance on Play Integrity checks<\/a> has been a nightmare for the custom ROM community, denying them access to popular apps. And now the other shoe is finally ready to drop, as Android prepares for mandatory developer registration<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t want to miss the best from Android Authority?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Beginning next year, Android will start blocking the installation of even sideloaded<\/a> apps from sources unknown to Google. Developers distributing their software through the Play Store already have to register with Google, but so far if you were only making APKs available for sideloading \u2014 like an open-source project might do, or a hobbyist just taking a stab at crafting an Android app for fun \u2014 you were free to remain anonymous.<\/p>\n

Right now I\u2019m not every worrying about the privacy implications; Google says it \u201cmay\u201d demand you upload a government ID. Locking down a platform such that it no longer supports the free installation of software without someone else\u2019s approval transforms Android from the handheld computer I always wanted into another iPhone game console. It just doesn\u2019t count as a full-blown computer anymore \u2014 and correspondingly, not as a proper smartphone.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m sure that hot take sounds incredibly reductive, but this is a huge problem that computing in general has been butting its head up against for years now, and it\u2019s far from unique to mobile devices. Secure Boot has been reducing software choice for users on Windows PCs, and while options there still exist, there are already big components of the ecosystem that have fallen into this same locked-down, chain-of-trust trap.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s another problem: This isn\u2019t really about security-security at all. Unlike systems like Play Protect, which attempt to determine whether the code we want to run on our phones is malicious or not, developer registration will do nothing to prevent you from installing and running malware. This is just about accountability \u2014 who to blame after the fact.<\/p>\n

In announcing mandatory developer registration, Google offers three arguments in favor of this system:<\/p>\n