![](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/74999046007.jpg\"\/)
![\"play\"](\"https:\/\/www.gannett-cdn.com\/appservices\/universal-web\/universal\/icons\/icon-play-alt-white.svg\"){kind=icon}
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Gen X retirement: 45% face shortfalls<\/p>\n
Retirement is supposed to be a golden phase, but for many Gen Xers it might not be.<\/p>\n
Cheddar<\/p>\n
Three decades ago, financial adviser Bill Bengen<\/a> created a retirement principle called the 4% rule. It went viral.\u00a0<\/p>\n Now, the rule is getting an update.\u00a0<\/p>\n The 4% rule says you should plan to spend 4% of your savings in the first year of retirement, and spend the same amount, adjusted for inflation, every year after that.\u00a0<\/p>\n It caught on because it\u2019s a simple formula to solve a complex problem: how to fund your retirement.\u00a0<\/p>\n The 4% rule has drawn praise and pillory for years. Now, Bengen says it\u2019s time for a revision: The 4% rule has become the 4.7% rule.\u00a0<\/p>\n The revision illustrates both the strength and weakness of the original 4% rule.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n The rule endures as one of the best-known concepts in personal finance, brilliant in its simplicity.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s lasted a long time because it\u2019s memorable and it makes a very complex human problem feel a lot more manageable,” said\u202fRob Williams<\/a>, managing director of financial planning at Charles Schwab.\u00a0<\/p>\n But some retirement experts say the rule is a little too simple. It dates to an era when many savers put half their money in stocks, half in bonds, the allocation Bengen used to formulate his original rule.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Nowadays, financial advisers often recommend that retirement savers diversify across a much longer list of \u201casset classes,\u201d which might include several types of stocks and bonds, real estate, cash and cash-equivalents. And fewer investors park half their money in the bond market.<\/p>\n How the 4% rule became the 4.7% rule<\/p>\n The 4% rule began in 1994 as some math in a paper<\/a> Bengen wrote for the Journal of Financial Planning. If retirees started out with that rate of spending, Bengen reasoned, their savings would last 30 years. (The actual figure was 4.15%. He rounded down.)\u00a0<\/p>\n The rule took off, surprising even its author.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cIt is surreal,\u201d Bengen said. \u201cI can\u2019t believe that I\u2019m still doing this, 30 years later.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Bengen has continued to refine the rule, along with his own investment habits. Thirty years ago, his research focused on an equal mix of U.S. government bonds and large-company stocks. Today, he works with a broader investment portfolio, including stocks for large, medium and small companies, international stocks, bonds and Treasury bills.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m up to seven asset classes now,\u201d he said.\u00a0<\/p>\n Bengen\u2019s calculations now assume a slightly less conservative mix of 55% stocks, 40% bonds and 5% cash.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n The broader portfolio, coupled with strong stock performance in recent years, changed the math for Bengen\u2019s rule. For a new book<\/a>, published in August, he posited the 4.7% rule.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThe primary reason for the change is that my research has gotten more sophisticated,\u201d he said.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Bengen practices what he preaches, more or less. When he retired in 2013, he followed an updated version of his own rule, spending 4.5% of his savings in the first year.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cAnd that turned out to be too conservative,\u201d he said. \u201cBecause the stock market has done so well, I\u2019ve been able to adjust upwards.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n He\u2019s now spending 4.9% a year.\u00a0<\/p>\n Is the 4% rule still valid?<\/p>\n The 4% rule remains ubiquitous in financial planning. It is also the subject of endless critiques, in articles that question whether the rule still works<\/a> or suggest it might no longer apply<\/a> to most of us.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThe 4% was a general rule of thumb, but the reality is, people really have to look at the true price of what it costs to be them in retirement, or the them they want to be,\u201d said\u202fCaleb Silver<\/a>, editor-in-chief of the financial journalism site Investopedia.\u202f\u202f\u00a0<\/p>\n Williams, of Schwab, said the 4% rule remains \u201ca good place to start.\u201d But a modern retirement plan, he said, is a living document. Retirees and their advisers can update spending targets every year, based on life changes, investment returns, inflation and other factors.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cMost folks that I talk to, their spending patterns over the 20 to 30 years they are retired are not static. They are dynamic,\u201d said Douglas Ornstein, a director with TIAA Wealth Management.\u00a0<\/p>\n One reason for the enduring popularity of the 4% rule is that it speaks to a paramount fear of Americans approaching retirement: outliving your money<\/a>. A recent survey, from Allianz Life, suggests we fear running out of money\u202fmore than death itself<\/a>.\u202f\u202f\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cAs humans, when we have complicated challenges, like how much do we spend in retirement, that\u2019s a scary question,\u201d Williams said.\u00a0<\/p>\n Many retirees follow the 4% rule. Some get it wrong.<\/p>\n Many retirees follow Bengen\u2019s rule to the letter.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cI know some people do take it literally, because I get emails from people all over, every day,\u201d Bengen said.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Not everyone gets the rule right. Some retirees mistakenly think the aim is to spend exactly 4% of your savings every year, Bengen said.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Here\u2019s how the original rule actually works:\u00a0<\/p>\n If you retire with $500,000 in savings, you spend $20,000 in the first year to supplement Social Security and any other income. If the inflation rate is 3%, you spend $20,600 in year two. And so on.\u00a0<\/p>\n Herein lies another problem with the 4% rule: It seems to work better for the well-heeled.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n The typical American in the 55-to-65 age range has about $185,000 in household retirement savings, according to the 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Apply the 4% rule to $185,000 and you get $7,400 a year: Not much money.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n