{"id":205780,"date":"2025-09-06T19:51:12","date_gmt":"2025-09-06T19:51:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/205780\/"},"modified":"2025-09-06T19:51:12","modified_gmt":"2025-09-06T19:51:12","slug":"doj-says-names-of-two-associates-epstein-wired-100k-and-250k-to-should-stay-secret","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/205780\/","title":{"rendered":"DOJ says names of two associates Epstein wired $100k and $250k to should stay secret"},"content":{"rendered":"<p id=\"anchor-5aa138\" class=\"body-graf\">The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal judge overseeing the case of deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein to deny <a href=\"https:\/\/embed.documentcloud.org\/documents\/26085226-nbc-epstein-letter-8-13-2025\/?embed=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">a request from NBC News<\/a> to unseal the names of two associates who received large payments from him in 2018, court documents show. The <a href=\"https:\/\/embed.documentcloud.org\/documents\/26085227-nbc-epstein-letter-doj-response-9-5-2025\/?embed=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Justice Department cited <\/a>privacy concerns expressed by the two individuals as the reason for not making their names public.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-131212\" class=\"body-graf\">The first associate received a payment of $100,000 from Epstein and the second associate received a payment of $250,000, both in 2018, days after the Miami Herald began publishing a series of investigative stories where victims criticized a plea deal he received in Florida in 2008.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-8ec333\" class=\"body-graf\">As part of the plea agreement, Epstein secured a statement from federal prosecutors in Florida that the two individuals would not be prosecuted.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-3b35d9\" class=\"body-graf\">The payments became public after Epstein was indicted and arrested in New York in 2019 and asked to be released on bail. Federal prosecutors in New York filed a memorandum on July 16, 2019, that argued Epstein should remain in jail to prevent him from tampering with witnesses.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-2e03ac\" class=\"body-graf\">They cited the payments he made to the two individuals, which began two days after the Miami Herald began publishing its stories on Epstein\u2019s plea deal, also known as a nonprosecution agreement, or NPA.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-5b6132\" class=\"body-graf\">Prosecutors wrote that on Nov. 30, 2018, Epstein \u201cwired $100,000 from a trust account he controlled, to an individual named as [REDACTED] a potential co-conspirator \u2014 and for whom Epstein obtained protection in \u2014 the NPA.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-bed105\" class=\"body-graf\">Prosecutors also wrote that \u201cthis individual was also named and featured prominently in the Herald series.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-813f7c\" class=\"body-graf\">Prosecutors added that \u201cthe same records show that just three days later, on or about December 3, 2018, the defendant wired $250,000 from the same trust account to [REDACTED], who was also named as a potential co-conspirator \u2014 and for whom Epstein also obtained protection in \u2014 the NPA.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-69501d\" class=\"body-graf\">The prosecutors continued: \u201cThis individual is also one of the employees identified in the Indictment, which alleges that she and two other identified employees facilitated the defendant\u2019s trafficking of minors by, among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with the defendant at his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-be97a4\" class=\"body-graf\">Prosecutors said in the filings that Epstein\u2019s payments may be evidence of \u201cefforts to influence witnesses.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-fd55cd\" class=\"body-graf\">\u201cThis course of action, and in particular its timing,\u201d they said, \u201csuggests the defendant was attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently re-emerging allegations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-0d076b\" class=\"body-graf\">Last month, <a href=\"https:\/\/embed.documentcloud.org\/documents\/26085226\/pages\/1\/?embed=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">NBC News sent a letter<\/a> asking U.S. District Judge Richard Berman to unseal the redacted names because Epstein is deceased, the criminal proceedings have ended, and the Justice Department said in a memo in July that there would be no additional charges filed against uncharged third parties.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-9689e4\" class=\"body-graf\">Berman <a href=\"https:\/\/embed.documentcloud.org\/documents\/26085226\/pages\/1\/?embed=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">gave federal prosecutors<\/a> until Sept. 5 to respond. <\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-7ec92b\" class=\"body-graf\">In a <a href=\"https:\/\/embed.documentcloud.org\/documents\/26085227-nbc-epstein-letter-doj-response-9-5-2025\/?embed=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Sept. 5 reply letter<\/a>, Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, wrote, \u201cIndividual-1 and Individual-2 are uncharged third parties who have not waived their privacy interests; indeed, both Individual-1 and Individual-2 have expressly objected to the unsealing of their names and personal identifying information in the July 2019 Letter.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-0767f9\" class=\"body-graf\">Clayton said the two unnamed individuals sent letters to the U.S. attorney\u2019s office expressing their concern but that those letters are under seal.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-d2c619\" class=\"body-graf\">The judge has given NBC News until Sept. 12 to respond to the Justice Department\u2019s request that the names remain secret.<\/p>\n<p id=\"anchor-108616\" class=\"endmark body-graf\">It is not known when Berman will make a ruling on NBC News\u2019 request.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal judge overseeing the case of deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":205781,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[51,50,52],"class_list":{"0":"post-205780","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"tag-headlines","9":"tag-news","10":"tag-top-stories"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115159097941988405","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205780","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205780"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205780\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/205781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}