{"id":212787,"date":"2025-09-09T12:20:17","date_gmt":"2025-09-09T12:20:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/212787\/"},"modified":"2025-09-09T12:20:17","modified_gmt":"2025-09-09T12:20:17","slug":"contributor-russia-wants-what-it-cannot-have","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/212787\/","title":{"rendered":"Contributor: Russia wants what it cannot have"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Vladimir Putin is on a roll the past few weeks. First President Trump invited him to Anchorage. Then he got a three-way hug<\/a> with China\u2019s President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a summit in China. And an invitation to a grand military parade<\/a> in Beijing.<\/p>\n

Since the 2014 annexation of Crimea, Putin had been shunted to the fringes<\/a> of summit group photos. After Russia\u2019s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, he had been treated as a pariah by the United States and Europe. Indicted<\/a> by the International Criminal Court on charges of genocide, he could travel only to countries that wouldn\u2019t arrest him. In short, Moscow was not being treated with the respect it believed it deserved.<\/p>\n

Trump thought that by literally rolling out the red carpet for Putin in Alaska \u2014 and clapping<\/a> as the Russian loped down the red carpet \u2014 he could reset the bilateral relationship. And it did. But not the way Trump intended.<\/p>\n

The Alaskan summit convinced the Russians that the current administration is willing to throw the sources of American global power out the window.<\/p>\n

Trade partners, geopolitical allies and alliances \u2014 everything is on the table for Trump. The U.S. president believes this shows his power; the Russians see this as a low-cost opportunity to degrade American influence. Putin was trained by the KGB to recognize weakness and exploit it.<\/p>\n

There is no evidence that being friendly to Putin and agreeing with Russian positions are going to make Moscow more willing to stop fighting in Ukraine. Overlooking Russia\u2019s intensifying hybrid attacks<\/a> on Europe, in February, Vice President JD Vance warned Europe that it should be focusing instead on the threat to democracy \u201cfrom within<\/a>.\u201d This followed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth\u2018s<\/a> assurances that Ukraine would never join NATO. Trump has suggested that U.S. support for NATO and Europe is contingent on those countries paying up. In an event that sent Moscow pundits to pop the Champagne<\/a>, Trump told Ukraine\u2019s President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office that he just didn\u2019t \u201chave the cards<\/a>\u201d and should stop trying to beat Russia.<\/p>\n

Did any of this bring Putin to the negotiating table? No.<\/p>\n

In fact, the Kremlin indicated a readiness to talk with Trump about the war only when Trump threatened \u201cvery, very powerful\u201d sanctions<\/a> in mid-July. This time, he seemed serious about it. The Alaska summit happened a month later. The tougher Trump is with Russia, the more likely he is to get any kind of traction in negotiations. It\u2019s unfortunate that the president has now gone back to vague two-week<\/a> deadlines<\/a> for imposing sanctions that never materialize.<\/p>\n

Russia believes it will win the war. China has been a steady friend, willing to sell Russia cars and dual-use technology that ends up in drones<\/a> that are attacking Ukrainian cities. It has also become Russia\u2019s largest buyer<\/a> of crude oil and coal. Western sanctions have not been biting the Russian economy, though they have nibbled away<\/a> at state revenues. Europe and the United States have not been willing to apply the kind of economic pressure that would seriously dent Russia\u2019s ability to carry on the war.<\/p>\n

Putin keeps saying that a resolution to the war requires that the West address the \u201croot causes\u201d of the war. These causes, for Russia, relate to the way it was treated after losing the Cold War. The three Baltic nations joined Europe as fast as they could. Central and Eastern European countries decided that they would rather be part of NATO than the Warsaw Pact. When Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine started asking for membership in the European Union and NATO, Russia realized it wouldn\u2019t be able to convince them to stay with economic appeal or soft power. It had to use force. Unable to demonstrate the attraction of its suffocating embrace, or the value of its Eurasian Economic Union, Russia believed it had to use force to keep Ukraine by its side. It reminds one of a grotesque Russian expression: \u201cIf he beats you, it means he loves you.\u201d<\/p>\n

The real \u201croot cause\u201d of the war in Ukraine is Russia\u2019s inability to accept that centuries of empire do not confer the right to dominate former colonies forever. Mongolia learned this. As did the British. And the French. And the Ottomans. The Austro-Hungarians.<\/p>\n

Eventually this war will end. But not soon. Russia is insisting on maximalist demands<\/a> that Ukraine cannot agree to, which include control over territory it hasn\u2019t managed to occupy. Ukraine will not stop fighting until it is sure that Russia will not attack again. Achieving that degree of certainty with flimsy security guarantees is impossible.<\/p>\n

In the meantime, Ukrainian cities on the frontline<\/a> will continue being wiped out, citizens in Kherson will continue being subjects of \u201chuman safari<\/a>\u201d for Russian drone operators, people across Ukraine will continue experiencing daily air raids that send them scurrying into shelters. Soldiers, volunteers, civilians and children will continue dying. Trump appears to care about the thousands of daily casualties. Most of these are Russian soldiers<\/a> who have been sent to their death by a Russian state that doesn\u2019t see their lives as worth preserving.<\/p>\n

Trump is understandably frustrated with his inability to \u201cstop the killing\u201d because he has assumed that satisfying Russian demands is the answer. The opposite is true: Only by showing \u2014 proving \u2014 to Russia that its demands are unattainable will the U.S. persuade the Kremlin to consider meaningful negotiations. Countries at war come to the negotiating table not because they are convinced to abandon their objectives. They sit down<\/a> when they realize their goals are unattainable.<\/p>\n

Alexandra Vacroux is the vice president for strategic engagement at the Kyiv School of Economics.<\/p>\n

Insights <\/p>\n

L.A. Times Insights<\/a> delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles. <\/p>\n

Viewpoint This article generally aligns with a Center<\/b> point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis<\/a> Perspectives <\/p>\n

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.<\/p>\n

Ideas expressed in the piece<\/p>\n