{"id":225113,"date":"2025-09-14T02:50:24","date_gmt":"2025-09-14T02:50:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/225113\/"},"modified":"2025-09-14T02:50:24","modified_gmt":"2025-09-14T02:50:24","slug":"california-bill-lets-renters-escape-exclusive-deals-between-isps-and-landlords","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/225113\/","title":{"rendered":"California bill lets renters escape exclusive deals between ISPs and landlords"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The bill also drew opposition from the Real Estate Technology &amp; Transformation Center (RETTC). The <a href=\"https:\/\/rettc.org\/membership\/sponsorships\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">group&#8217;s sponsors<\/a> include real estate companies and Internet providers AT&amp;T, Comcast, and Cox. Another notable sponsor of RETTC is RealPage, which has <a href=\"https:\/\/arstechnica.com\/tech-policy\/2024\/08\/us-sues-realpage-claims-rental-pricing-algorithm-used-by-landlords-is-illegal\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">faced claims<\/a> from the US government and state attorneys general that its software distorts competition in rental housing by helping landlords collectively set prices.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;AB 1414 introduces an opt-out requirement that would fundamentally undermine the economics of bulk billing,&#8221; the <a href=\"https:\/\/bbcmag.com\/viewpoints-california-bill-would-hurt-broadband-affordability-access\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RETTC said<\/a>. &#8220;By fragmenting service, it could destabilize networks and reduce the benefits residents and operators rely on today.&#8221; The group claimed the bill could lead to &#8220;higher broadband costs for renters, reduced ISP investment in multifamily housing, disruption of property-wide smart technology, [and] widening of the digital divide in California.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The RETTC said it joined with the National Apartment Association and the California Rental Housing Association to detail the groups&#8217; concerns directly to the bill sponsors.<\/p>\n<p>Wireless providers could get a boost<\/p>\n<p>The California Broadband &amp; Video Association seems to be worried about wireless providers serving buildings wired up with cable. The group&#8217;s commentary claimed that &#8220;the bill&#8217;s lack of technology neutrality also creates winners and losers, granting certain types of providers an unfair advantage over their competitors.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ransom said her bill may be especially helpful for wireless or satellite providers because they wouldn&#8217;t need to install wires in each building.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This does help with market competition, and in fact some of our support came from some of the smaller Internet service providers&#8230; and because this bill is technology-neutral, it helps with not only the current technology, but any new technology that comes out,&#8221; she said.<\/p>\n<p>While Ransom&#8217;s bill could help make broadband more affordable for renters, California lawmakers recently abandoned a more aggressive effort to require affordable broadband plans. Assemblymember Tasha Boerner <a href=\"https:\/\/arstechnica.com\/tech-policy\/2025\/03\/california-bill-would-force-isps-to-offer-100mbps-plans-for-15-a-month\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">proposed a state law<\/a> that would force Internet service providers to offer $15 monthly plans to people with low incomes but <a href=\"https:\/\/arstechnica.com\/tech-policy\/2025\/07\/california-backs-down-to-trump-admin-wont-force-isps-to-offer-15-broadband\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">tabled the bill<\/a> after the Trump administration threatened to block funding for expanding broadband networks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The bill also drew opposition from the Real Estate Technology &amp; Transformation Center (RETTC). The group&#8217;s sponsors include&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":225114,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[712,158,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-225113","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-internet","8":"tag-internet","9":"tag-technology","10":"tag-united-states","11":"tag-unitedstates","12":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115200381627350733","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225113\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/225114"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}