A fringe new theory suggests that time is the fundamental structure of the physical universe, and space is merely a byproduct.<\/p>\n
According to Gunther Kletetschka, a geologist \u2014 not a physicist, you’ll note, but more on that later \u2014 from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, time is three-dimensional and the dimensions of space are an emergent property of it, a press release from the university explains<\/a>.<\/p>\n “These three time dimensions are the primary fabric of everything, like the canvas of a painting,” Kletetschka said in the blurb. “Space still exists with its three dimensions, but it’s more like the paint on the canvas rather than the canvas itself.”<\/p>\n Three-dimensional time is a theory that has been proposed before, though generally in pretty inaccessible terms<\/a>. Similarly to the explanation for three dimensions of space \u2014 length, width, and depth \u2014 3D time theory claims that time can move forward in the linear progression we know, sideways between parallel possible timelines, and along each one of those as it unfolds.<\/p>\n Yes, it’s a pretty mind-blowing concept \u2014 but scientists have long theorized that time, as the fourth dimension in Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, is less intuitive than it seems in everyday reality.<\/p>\n While other 3D time theories rely on traditional physics, Kletetschka suggests that his may help explain the many outstanding questions accepted physics still harbors. In a somewhat grandiose manner, the geologist even claims that his 3D time proposal could operate as a grand unifying theory or “theory of everything,” the Holy Grail of quantum mechanics that would explain how the universe works on a sweeping level.<\/p>\n “The path to unification might require fundamentally reconsidering the nature of physical reality itself,” the scientist said. “This theory demonstrates how viewing time as three-dimensional can naturally resolve multiple physics puzzles through a single coherent mathematical framework.”<\/p>\n Obviously, there are an astonishing number of caveats to consider here. For one, Kletetschka is not a theoretical physicist \u2014 he’s a geologist, and according to his university bio<\/a> he also has some experience in astronomy.<\/p>\n Extraordinary claims all call for extraordinary evidence. And the claims here are already stirring controversy: as an editor’s note added to the end of the press release cautions, the scientist’s theory was published in the journal Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences<\/a>, a “legitimate step,” but one that isn’t remotely sufficient to take it out of the realm of the fringe. That journal, the note adds, is “relatively low-impact and niche, and its peer review does not match the rigorous scrutiny applied by top-tier journals.”<\/p>\n “The theory is still in the early stages of scrutiny,” the note concluded, “and has not been published in leading physics journals or independently verified through experiments or peer-reviewed replication.”<\/p>\n Still, it’s a fascinating concept to consider \u2014 especially because we still don’t know exactly how time works<\/a>, anyway.<\/p>\n