{"id":249777,"date":"2025-09-23T20:12:12","date_gmt":"2025-09-23T20:12:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/249777\/"},"modified":"2025-09-23T20:12:12","modified_gmt":"2025-09-23T20:12:12","slug":"rfks-autism-report-twists-correlation-into-causation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/249777\/","title":{"rendered":"RFK\u2019s autism report twists correlation into causation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The US Department of Health and Human Services yesterday <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes.com\/us\/american-politics\/article\/tylenol-autism-trump-rfk-pregnant-fever-n0w3fv7t0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">announced<\/a> that pregnant women should avoid acetaminophen \u2014 known in Britain as paracetamol, and the active ingredient in Tylenol \u2014 because of concerns it may increase the risk of autism in unborn children. But millions of mothers use paracetamol to manage pain and fevers during their pregnancies because it\u2019s the only drug available to them to safely do so. Or at least, that\u2019s what they\u2019ve been told for the past few decades, but apparently no longer.<\/p>\n<p>The HHS\u2019 rationale for the new Tylenol warning is based on a systematic review led by Harvard Dean of Public Health Andrea Baccarelli. Dr. Baccarelli\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/press-room\/autism-announcement-fact-sheet.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">review<\/a> contends that there is a \u201cstrong, consistent association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and ADHD\/ASD\/other NDDs\u201d. The review emphasised that this result was exceptionally robust, that it stood strong in studies controlling for bundles of different confounders, with negative control exposure periods, and with propensity score matching. The only problem is that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cremieux.xyz\/p\/you-cant-just-control-for-things\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">none of these methods<\/a> are reliable and the authors actually ignored some good evidence that contradicts their conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>The main failing point of the review is that its authors knew about good evidence in the form of <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jama\/fullarticle\/2817406\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sibling control studies<\/a> \u2014 studies where scientists compare a sibling who is exposed to Tylenol in utero to a sibling who wasn\u2019t exposed to it \u2014 and they ignored those results. But those studies were the strongest; it just happens to be the case that those studies didn\u2019t find anything alarming. To me, that seems like the correct explanation for why the authors were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cremieux.xyz\/i\/174283509\/does-tylenol-cause-autism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">so gung-ho<\/a> to attack them on spurious grounds.<\/p>\n<p>In the largest, highest-quality <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jama\/fullarticle\/2817406\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">example<\/a>, researchers used almost 2.5 million births from Sweden between 1995 and 2019, used great measures of Tylenol exposure in a country where most Tylenol use is <a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/bcpt.13003\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">by prescription<\/a>, and they found much the same as the other non-causal studies: mothers who used more Tylenol during pregnancy have children with autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders more often. But they went further than replicating that purely correlational association. In fact, they showed that, when comparing differentially exposed siblings, the one exposed to Tylenol was no more likely to have any disorder than the one who was not exposed. In other words, the association isn\u2019t causal at all.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"94\" data-end=\"388\">The review was plagued by non-sequiturs. It cited weak evidence as if it were strong. The authors failed to quantitatively synthesise the findings of the studies they referenced. Worse, they botched the table entries and even cited studies in ways directly contradicted by the studies themselves. The review was lazy, but it ostensibly supports what some people really want to believe: that Tylenol causes autism.<\/p>\n<p>As a result of this bastardised faux-science masquerading as real information, millions of pregnant women will be scared into avoiding Tylenol or any brand of paracetamol, even when it might be the drug they need. Mothers who need to break a fever or manage pain have no alternatives: opiates aren\u2019t acceptable, and Ibuprofen isn\u2019t safe before foetuses have undergone about two trimesters of growth. If it were true that Tylenol is causing autism, then there might be some debate to be had about the risk-reward calculus for letting pregnant women use it, but there isn\u2019t. The science is abundantly clear: Tylenol does not cause autism.<\/p>\n<p>When our public health authorities get scientific questions wrong, suffering follows. Who will cry out for the mothers?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The US Department of Health and Human Services yesterday announced that pregnant women should avoid acetaminophen \u2014 known&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":249778,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[824,69,210,16467,15073,11164,49697,159,47486,9656,67,132,68,132414],"class_list":{"0":"post-249777","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-health","8":"tag-autism","9":"tag-donald-trump","10":"tag-health","11":"tag-optional","12":"tag-paracetamol","13":"tag-pregnancy","14":"tag-rfk-jr","15":"tag-science","16":"tag-tylenol","17":"tag-uncategorized","18":"tag-united-states","19":"tag-unitedstates","20":"tag-us","21":"tag-us-department-of-health-and-human-services"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115255439831256340","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249777\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/249778"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}