{"id":281244,"date":"2025-10-06T07:50:13","date_gmt":"2025-10-06T07:50:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/281244\/"},"modified":"2025-10-06T07:50:13","modified_gmt":"2025-10-06T07:50:13","slug":"gov-jb-pritzker-says-texas-national-guard-being-deployed-to-illinois","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/281244\/","title":{"rendered":"Gov. JB Pritzker says Texas National Guard being deployed to Illinois"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>President Donald Trump\u2019s administration plans to deploy 300 Illinois National Guard troops to the Chicago region for at least 60 days, according to a memo from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to Illinois National Guard leadership and obtained by the Tribune.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, likely hundreds of National Guard members from Texas were preparing to be sent to Illinois, Gov. JB Pritzker said late Sunday.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis evening, President Trump is ordering 400 members of the Texas National Guard for deployments to Illinois, Oregon, and other locations within the United States,\u201d Pritzker said, adding that the Illinois National Guard was informed of the Texas deployments and that no officials from the federal government had called him directly to discuss or coordinate. \u201cWe must now start calling this what it is: Trump\u2019s Invasion. It started with federal agents, it will soon include deploying federalized members of the Illinois National Guard against our wishes, and it will now involve sending in another state\u2019s military troops.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The developments capped a weekend of rapid-fire moves by the Trump administration as it escalated its immigration enforcement actions in Illinois and in Oregon, where Trump moved to send National Guard troops from California to evade a federal judge\u2019s temporary restraining order. Late Sunday, that same judge during an emergency hearing again blocked Trump\u2019s efforts, issuing a ruling to stop the president\u2019s deployment of California National Guard troops to Portland.<\/p>\n<p>In his memo to the Illinois National Guard issued Saturday, Hegseth informed Guard leadership that up to 300 of its members will be called into federal service \u201ceffective immediately\u201d for a two-month period.<\/p>\n<p>The president called on guard members to protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal Protective Service and other federal government personnel \u201cwho are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property, at locations where violent demonstrations against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations,\u201d the memo stated.<\/p>\n<p>Much of the historic move to federalize Illinois National Guard troops \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/10\/04\/pritzker-donald-trump-national-guard\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">over Pritzker\u2019s objections<\/a> \u2014 was laid out by Pritzker on Saturday and was soon defended by the White House, while Democrats slammed it as a power grab by the president to sow fear and division.<\/p>\n<p>Saying the Trump administration issued him an ultimatum to \u201cCall up your troops, or we will,\u201d Pritzker said on Saturday that he would not deploy the state\u2019s National Guard and contended a federal deployment over his objection is illegal. He has also vowed to go to court to stop it, previously citing the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the military from conducting law enforcement activities on U.S. soil.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson for Pritzker said Sunday that the governor has not communicated with Trump administration officials regarding the Illinois deployment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Governor did not receive any calls from any federal officials. The Illinois National Guard communicated to the Department of War that the situation in Illinois does not require the use of the military and, as a result, the Governor opposes the deployment of the National Guard under any status,\u201d the governor\u2019s spokesperson said in an emailed response.<\/p>\n<p>The White House said the troops were needed ostensibly to ensure the safety of federal agents and facilities that are part of Trump\u2019s immigration enforcement surge that has hit the Chicago area <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/09\/09\/chicago-immigration-operation-midway-blitz\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">for the past month<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Hegseth memo didn\u2019t specify exactly where the deployments would take place, but said the chief of the National Guard Bureau, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the commander of U.S. Northern Command would coordinate details about the mobilization with the Illinois National Guard.<\/p>\n<p>The White House confirmed on Sunday evening that the National Guard troops being called up to the Chicago area would be working without pay until the ongoing federal government shutdown, which began on Wednesday, is resolved.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s moves in Illinois occurred while Judge Karin Immergut \u2014 whom Trump appointed to the U.S. District Court in Oregon \u2014 on Saturday night blocked the president\u2019s mobilization of 200 Oregon National Guard members in Portland. On Sunday, Trump sought to circumvent the temporary restraining order in Oregon by federalizing 300 National Guard members from California for deployment in Portland but late Sunday Immergut blocked that move as well.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow could bringing in federalized National Guard from California not be in direct contravention of the (decision) I issued yesterday?,\u201d Immergut asked a Trump administration lawyer during a hearing on Sunday night.<\/p>\n<p>California Gov. Gavin Newsom had called Trump\u2019s effort to send California troops to Oregon a \u201cbreathtaking abuse of power.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Trump Administration is unapologetically attacking the rule of law itself and putting into action their dangerous words \u2014 ignoring court orders and treating judges, even those appointed by the President himself, as political opponents,\u201d Newsom said.<\/p>\n<p>Hours later, Pritzker said Trump was trying to do much of the same by likely sending hundreds of Texas National Guard members to Illinois.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI call on Governor Abbott to immediately withdraw any support for this decision and refuse to coordinate,\u201d Pritzker said of Texas\u2019 Republican governor, who has long bickered with Pritzker. \u201cThere is no reason a President should send military troops into a sovereign state without their knowledge, consent, or cooperation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe brave men and women who serve in our national guards must not be used as political props. This is a moment where every American must speak up and help stop this madness,\u201d Pritzker said.<\/p>\n<p>Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul did not have specific plans to file new lawsuits against the Trump administration following news of the Illinois National Guard deployment and the issuance of the Oregon temporary restraining order.<\/p>\n<p>Annie Thompson, a spokesperson for Raoul, said in a statement Sunday that the attorney general \u201cis firmly committed to upholding the Constitution and defending the rule of law.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur office will not hesitate to take legal action in the event of any unlawful deployment anywhere in Illinois,\u201d Thompson said.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson for Democratic Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, who filed suit seeking to block the Oregon National Guard deployment, said the office has \u201cbeen in touch and coordinating\u201d on legal strategy with Raoul\u2019s office.<\/p>\n<p>Rayfield spokesperson Jenny Hansson also said Democratic attorneys general \u201chave been working closely since January to hold the line on this administration.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Speaking Sunday outside the White House as he prepared for a naval celebration in Norfolk, Virginia, Trump intimated that Pritzker was opposing efforts to bring in the National Guard to Illinois because it would anger opponents of immigration enforcement efforts, adding that protesters in Chicago and Portland are \u201cpaid people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He also said Pritzker was \u201cafraid for his life,\u201d apparently contending the governor does not want to run afoul of organizations and networks the administration alleges are behind the protests over enhanced immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.<\/p>\n<p>Repeating as he often does basic Chicago police blotter statistics about murders and shootings and lauding his federalization of law enforcement <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/08\/31\/trump-dc-takeover-chicago\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">in Washington, D.C.<\/a>, Trump criticized Pritzker, a major critic of the president, for saying \u201cwhat a wonderful place\u201d Chicago is when \u201cthey need help.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI believe the politicians are under threat, because there\u2019s no way somebody can say that things are wonderful in Chicago,\u201d Trump said. \u201cThere\u2019s no city in the world like that. We\u2019re going to straighten it out. And I think that Pritzker, he\u2019s not a stupid person. I think that Pritzker is afraid for his life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Pritzker, speaking on CNN\u2019s \u201cState of the Union,\u201d said it was the Trump administration and federal agents participating in the raids who \u201care the ones that are making it a war zone.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey want mayhem on the ground. They want to create the war zone so that they can send in even more troops,\u201d Pritzker said.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Iraq War veteran who retired as a lieutenant colonel in the Illinois Army National Guard, sought to downplay potential confrontations with the Trump-ordered deployment of Illinois National Guard members.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo they\u2019ll be homegrown Illinoisans, and they\u2019re our brothers and sisters, our neighbors. I probably served with quite a number of them, certainly the leadership. And, you know, they\u2019ll be home. We\u2019ll welcome them,\u201d Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat, said on CBS News\u2019 \u201cFace the Nation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a misuse of the National Guard. They\u2019re not needed, but we\u2019re going to welcome them, because they\u2019re our brothers and sisters, and we\u2019re proud of our National Guard,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s National Guard plans also drew opposition from a coalition of business and civic groups.<\/p>\n<p>Troop deployment could harm the \u201cmeaningful progress\u201d being made to make Chicago safer by sowing \u201cfear and chaos,\u201d according to a statement from the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago and Civic Federation.\u00a0The statement touted the work already underway to address violence in the city and described Trump\u2019s plans as a threat to \u201cour businesses\u2019 bottom lines and our reputation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In his comments outside the White House, Trump criticized Judge Karin Immergut \u2014 whom he appointed to the U.S. District Court in Oregon \u2014 for blocking the deployment of Oregon National Guard troops in Portland. Trump did not at that time mention his plans to send California National Guard members to the city.<\/p>\n<p>Immergut said Trump\u2019s basis for deploying the guard in Portland was \u201csimply untethered to the facts\u201d and that historic tradition \u201cboils down to a simple proposition: this is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law.\u201d Allowing the troops to be deployed risk \u201cblurring the line between civil and military federal power \u2014 to the detriment of this nation,\u201d Immergut wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Trump acknowledged appointing the judge but said, \u201cI wasn\u2019t served well.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPortland is burning to the ground. You have agitators, insurrectionists. All you have to do is look at that, look at the television,\u201d Trump said. \u201cThat judge ought to be ashamed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Immergut, in the ruling, also noted that \u201cstate and local law enforcement will need to expend additional resources to quell increased civil unrest that is likely to result from the Guard\u2019s mobilization.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition to sending guard troops to Washington, Trump previously federalized guard troops in Los Angeles after sporadic anti-ICE protests in June, a move a federal judge said was illegal for domestic law enforcement. That ruling was stayed pending an appeal, and troops have remained deployed in Southern California. Newsom said those are the troops being sent to Oregon. Trump has also announced he was deploying the guard to Memphis with the support of Tennessee GOP Gov. Bill Lee.<\/p>\n<p>Tribune reporter Jake Sheridan contributed.<\/p>\n<p>Originally Published: October 5, 2025 at 3:37 PM CDT<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"President Donald Trump\u2019s administration plans to deploy 300 Illinois National Guard troops to the Chicago region for at&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":281245,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,3],"tags":[960,10323,69,143590,409,12084,50,6986,7093,358,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-281244","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-united-states","8":"category-us","9":"tag-chicago","10":"tag-deployments","11":"tag-donald-trump","12":"tag-illinois-national-guard","13":"tag-immigration","14":"tag-jb-pritzker","15":"tag-news","16":"tag-pete-hegseth","17":"tag-raids","18":"tag-texas","19":"tag-united-states","20":"tag-unitedstates","21":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115326132322981256","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281244\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/281245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}