At the polls next month, New Yorkers will choose among mayoral candidates who have significantly different proposals. But they all agree on one thing: The status quo isn\u2019t working for New Yorkers.<\/p>\n
They\u2019re right. The Citizens Budget Commission \u201cStraight from New Yorkers\u201d resident survey<\/a> earlier this year found that just 34% of New Yorkers now rate quality of life in the city excellent or good \u2014 down from 51% before the pandemic.<\/p>\n Although most serious crime is declining, New Yorkers\u2019 fear remains high: Only 42% feel safe in their neighborhood.<\/p>\n High housing costs and taxes threaten to drive more New Yorkers away. When asked why they might consider leaving, New Yorkers point to affordability, public safety, space, and taxes.<\/p>\n And now only 27% of New Yorkers rate city services excellent or good, a steep drop from 44% pre-pandemic. While they rate the Fire Department and trash collection highly, they give low marks to homeless, mental health, and substance abuse services.<\/p>\n Poor services aren\u2019t just frustrating, they\u2019re a rip-off. New Yorkers pay some of the nation\u2019s highest taxes; they deserve to feel they get what they pay for.<\/p>\n No wonder only 11% of New Yorkers think the city is spending their tax dollars wisely.<\/p>\n New Yorkers want their next mayor to deliver on the city\u2019s promise to be the epicenter of opportunity, cultural and economic vibrancy, talent, and creativity.\u00a0That will require more than campaign promises. It will require bold choices and brass-tacks management that deliver real results, despite the practical constraints and pressures of governing.<\/p>\n The next administration will have to close next year\u2019s $6 to $8 billion budget gap and prepare for the onslaught of federal cuts. It will face the limits of its power on everything from tax policy to infrastructure approvals, and political pressure to provide almost every constituency a near infinite array of services.<\/p>\n Government cannot provide all things to all people \u2014 but the next mayor can deliver services that work, and a more affordable, livable, stable city.\u00a0How? By making smart choices.<\/p>\n The Citizens Budget Commission<\/a> has gathered some of the city\u2019s most experienced practitioners across government, labor, and business at CUNY\u2019s Baruch College today<\/a> for a deep dive into smart choices the next mayor should make \u2014 bold actions within the reality of governing.<\/p>\n Sure, there will be disagreements. That\u2019s welcome. New York has overcome its greatest challenges when New Yorkers from different sectors devised common solutions.<\/p>\n Fiscal instability threatens to unleash damaging service cuts. It\u2019s the smart choice to bring spending in line with revenues.<\/p>\n Our nation\u2019s highest taxes generate plenty of money to meet needs. It\u2019s the smart choice to spend it better, getting value out of every dollar.<\/p>\n It\u2019s the smart choice to deposit money into the Rainy Day Fund to protect New Yorkers from a future recession, though it may mean not starting a program today. All candidates endorsed this; let\u2019s see the winner follow through.<\/p>\n It\u2019s the smart choice to build a cushion to protect New Yorkers from the impact of looming federal cuts. The story is still unfolding, with enacted cuts to Medicaid and SNAP phasing in and cuts to housing, health, and education likely coming.<\/p>\n Running programs well can protect our neighbors from cuts. For example: making fewer errors in determining who is eligible for SNAP \u2014 like we used to \u2014 can stave off hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts.<\/p>\n It\u2018s the smart choice to focus on programs in education, housing, homelessness, and mental health that are proven to work, while eliminating those that don\u2019t \u2014 no matter how popular.<\/p>\n It\u2019s the smart choice to supercharge housing production citywide, though some may object to new housing in their neighborhood. The City of Yes will help, but it still leaves 80% of the production need unfilled. New Yorkers should vote Yes on Charter Let\u2019s fast-track more affordable housing, get the state to streamline environmental review, and finally reform the property tax \u2014 another critical change all candidates have endorsed.<\/p>\n It\u2019s the smart choice to focus capital dollars on getting our infrastructure to a state of good repair, even though it could mean pausing some grand new projects. Fixing the BQE and aging sewers may not be sexy, but they\u2019re essential.<\/p>\n Campaign promises can be inspiring, but smart choices make progress. A better future for all New Yorkers depends on leaders who will follow through and deliver.<\/p>\n Rein is president of the Citizens Budget Commission.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"At the polls next month, New Yorkers will choose among mayoral candidates who have significantly different proposals. But…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":281651,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[5229,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,1269,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-281650","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-new-york","10":"tag-new-york-city","11":"tag-newyork","12":"tag-newyorkcity","13":"tag-ny","14":"tag-nyc","15":"tag-opinion","16":"tag-united-states","17":"tag-united-states-of-america","18":"tag-unitedstates","19":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","20":"tag-us","21":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115327142753594699","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281650\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/281651"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
amendments, 2, 3 and 4. They will help but are still not enough.<\/p>\n