{"id":286423,"date":"2025-10-08T11:49:15","date_gmt":"2025-10-08T11:49:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/286423\/"},"modified":"2025-10-08T11:49:15","modified_gmt":"2025-10-08T11:49:15","slug":"senators-spar-over-plans-to-move-shuttle-discovery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/286423\/","title":{"rendered":"Senators spar over plans to move shuttle Discovery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand \u2014 A provision in the budget reconciliation bill that funds the move of a space shuttle orbiter from the Smithsonian to a Houston museum continues to stir debate among senators amid concerns about the cost and viability of such a move.<\/p>\n<p>A provision in the budget reconciliation bill, H.R. 1, enacted in July provided $85 million for a \u201cspace vehicle transfer.\u201d While the language of the bill was not specific, that provision was interpreted by many to seek to move Discovery, currently at the National Air and Space Museum\u2019s Udvar-Hazy Center in northern Virginia, to Space Center Houston.<\/p>\n<p>NASA said Aug. 5 that <a href=\"https:\/\/spacenews.com\/nasa-selects-shuttle-orbiter-to-move-to-houston\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">it complied with language in the bill requiring the agency to select the vehicle for transfer<\/a> but did not disclose the vehicle. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, immediately sent out a release announcing that NASA had selected a shuttle and that \u201cCongressional intent of the law makes clear that this is aimed at the movement of Space Shuttle Discovery.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The move has prompted efforts to block the transfer. Four Democratic senators, including Virginia\u2019s Mark Warner and Tim Kaine as well as Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kelly.senate.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/2025.09.23-Letter-to-Appropriators-re-Space-Shuttle-Discovery-Transfer.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sent a letter to the leaders of the Senate Appropriations Committee Sept. 23<\/a> asking them to include language in a final fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill to prevent the use of any additional federal funds for a move. Kelly is a former astronaut whose twice flew on Discovery.<\/p>\n<p>The $85 million, they stated falls far short of the actual costs to move Discovery and build a new exhibit for the orbiter in Houston. \u201cDedicating hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to move an artifact that is already housed, displayed, and preserved in a world-class facility is both inefficient and unjustifiable,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n<p>They also raised questions about the safety of such a move. \u201cMoving the shuttle would inevitably and irreparably compromise the artifact and render it unusable as a museum-quality collection item, permanently diminishing its historical and cultural value for future generations,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter sent to congressional committees and later distributed to media by advocates for keeping Discovery in Virginia, the Smithsonian Institution said both it and NASA estimated the cost for moving Discovery to be $120 million to $150 million, a figure that excludes the cost of building a facility for housing the orbiter at Space Center Houston.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile an engineering study will be necessary due to the size and weight of the space vehicle, both NASA and the Smithsonian believe that Discovery will have to undergo significant disassembly to be moved,\u201d the letter stated. \u201cDiscovery is the most intact shuttle orbiter of the NASA program, and we remain concerned that disassembling the vehicle will destroy its historical value.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The letter also reiterated the Smithsonian\u2019s position that the orbiter is not NASA\u2019s to transfer. It notes that NASA transferred \u201call rights, title, interest and ownership\u201d to Discovery when the museum took possession of the orbiter more than a decade ago.<\/p>\n<p>The release of that memo, as well as the earlier letter from Democratic senators, prompted <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cornyn.senate.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Discovery-Shuttle-Letter-to-Appropriations.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a response Oct. 6 by Cornyn and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas<\/a>. In their own letter to the leaders of the Senate Appropriations Committee, they asked that no restrictions be placed on funding for the shuttle\u2019s move to Houston in fiscal 2026 spending bills.<\/p>\n<p>The letter reiterated past claims that NASA selected the locations where the retired shuttles would be placed based on political influence, even though <a href=\"https:\/\/oig.nasa.gov\/office-of-inspector-general-oig\/sr-2011-shuttle\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a review by NASA\u2019s inspector general in 2011<\/a> found no evidence of such influence.<\/p>\n<p>The Texas senators also claimed that the Smithsonian was lobbying Congress to block the transfer, which they claimed was \u201cconduct that appears to violate the Anti-Lobbying Act.\u201d Those efforts included \u201cmisinformation about the logistics of the move, falsely claiming that the shuttle\u2019s wings would need to be removed for transport, a claim not supported by industry experts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The senators said the cost estimates for the move developed by the Smithsonian and NASA were \u201cmore than ten times higher than quotes from experienced private-sector logistics firms,\u201d although the letter did not elaborate on those other estimates, or the expertise those firms have in moving a vehicle like Discovery.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tRelated<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand \u2014 A provision in the budget reconciliation bill that funds the move of a space&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":286424,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[916,159,16854,16988,783,29082,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-286423","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-space","8":"tag-nasa","9":"tag-science","10":"tag-senate","11":"tag-sn","12":"tag-space","13":"tag-space-shuttle","14":"tag-united-states","15":"tag-unitedstates","16":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115338396557083249","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286423"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286423\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/286424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}