{"id":29788,"date":"2025-07-01T12:10:18","date_gmt":"2025-07-01T12:10:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/29788\/"},"modified":"2025-07-01T12:10:18","modified_gmt":"2025-07-01T12:10:18","slug":"what-to-know-about-trumps-social-security-overhaul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/29788\/","title":{"rendered":"What to know about Trump&#8217;s Social Security overhaul"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Selena Maranjian<br \/>\n\u00a0|\u00a0 The Motley Fool<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;ve been paying attention, you&#8217;ll have noticed that while President Donald Trump&#8217;s administration has not canceled <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/retirement\/social-security\/?utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Social Security<\/a>, as some may have feared it would, it has made some changes \u2014 and more changes may be coming.<\/p>\n<p>These changes, some of which may seem to be a good thing, are likely to hurt retirees in the long run. They may even affect retirees now, in 2025, especially when it comes to retirement planning. It&#8217;s hard to plan when you&#8217;re not sure what&#8217;s happening next.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a look at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/retirement\/2025\/05\/03\/5-social-security-changes-president-trump-100-days\/?utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">what has been happening with Social Security<\/a>\u00a0and how it might affect you.<\/p>\n<p>Layoffs at Social Security<\/p>\n<p>The Social Security Administration (SSA) said in February that it plans to reduce its workforce of about 57,000 by about 7,000 \u2014 a cut of about 12%. That&#8217;s concerning because fewer employees may mean fewer people available to help retirees and pre-retirees with their Social Security benefits.<\/p>\n<p>The SSA is actually already an extremely efficient organization, even before these layoffs. The percentage of Social Security spending that goes to administration was only 0.5% in 2024 \u2014 down from 1% in 2006 and 1.5% in 1978.<\/p>\n<p>No more paper checks<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s true that most beneficiaries receive their monthly benefits electronically these days, but close to half a million retirees still receive paper checks. The Trump administration is ending paper checks. This will clearly affect lots of retirees, as many may not be able to easily set up direct deposits. Plenty are in their 90s, after all, and some don&#8217;t even have bank accounts.<\/p>\n<p>Tougher identification rules<\/p>\n<p>Until recently, many retirees have been able to make Social Security transactions, such as changing direct deposit account numbers or applying for benefits, over the phone. Now, many such actions must be done online via a &#8220;my Social Security&#8221; account with two-factor authentication or in person at an SSA office. Those who are not that technologically adept or who live far from an SSA office will clearly be inconvenienced.<\/p>\n<p>Social Security taxation is (not!) eliminated<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m including this non-change because Trump has spoken a lot about how he wants to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits. This is a tricky issue because while retirees would love to not face any taxes on their benefits, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/retirement\/2025\/05\/11\/president-trump-promised-not-to-cut-social-securit\/?utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">those taxes do generate revenue for Social Security<\/a>. Without that revenue, the already-challenged program may see its surplus run dry even sooner than expected.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/retirement\/2025\/06\/07\/trump-bill-missing-no-tax-social-security-promise\/?utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Trump&#8217;s &#8220;Big, Beautiful Bill&#8221; does not have the tax cancelation in it<\/a>, which is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/retirement\/2025\/06\/11\/president-donald-trumps-one-big-beautiful-bill-doe\/?utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">a good thing for Social Security<\/a>\u00a0in the long run. Still, it might get added, as Congress is still shaping what actually gets passed.<\/p>\n<p>Many Social Security regional offices are (not!) closing<\/p>\n<p>This spring, there were reputable reports that as many as 47 Social Security offices were being targeted for closure \u2014 with an Associated Press report linking to a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) list of federal real estate closures and listing 26 offices slated to close in 2025. Obviously, if offices are closed, many retirees will have to travel farther to visit the office closest to them or simply may not be able to access a nearby office.<\/p>\n<p>But in late March, the SSA issued a notice saying that &#8220;Recent reports in the media that the Social Security Administration (SSA) is permanently closing local field offices <strong>are false<\/strong>.&#8221; It added, &#8220;We have not permanently closed any local field offices this year.&#8221; Still, this status quo may change.<\/p>\n<p>The elephant in the room \u2014 a shrinking surplus<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the biggest way that retirees could be hurt by the Trump administration when it comes to Social Security: The program long ran a surplus, taking in more than it had to pay out, but with more people living longer and retiring early these days, the surplus is being used up and is estimated to run dry in 2034 \u2014 only eight years away \u2014 if nothing is done to strengthen the program. So far, there&#8217;s little indication that the folks in charge in Washington want to strengthen it. (There are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/retirement\/2025\/05\/06\/heres-what-experts-say-it-will-take-to-fix-social\/?utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">multiple ways to fix this problem<\/a>, though.)<\/p>\n<p>So, if nothing is done, beginning around 2034, beneficiaries will only receive 81% of what they&#8217;re due. With the average monthly retirement benefit of $2,002 as of May, a 19% cut would shrink that benefit to $1,622, reducing it by $380.<\/p>\n<p>Social Security&#8217;s future right now is unclear, with various parties wanting to make various big changes. If you&#8217;re anywhere near retiring, you may want to pay close attention to this issue.<\/p>\n<p>The Motley Fool has a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/legal\/fool-disclosure-policy\/?utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">disclosure policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0$23,760\u00a0Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook<\/p>\n<p><b>Offer from the Motley Fool: <\/b>If you&#8217;re like most Americans, you&#8217;re a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-social-security%2F%3Faid%3D10953%26source%3Disaeditxt0010931%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-retirement%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D15161&amp;utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" rel=\"nofollow sponsored noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Social Security secrets&#8221;<\/a><\/strong>could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.<\/p>\n<p><strong>One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more<\/strong>&#8230; each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we&#8217;re all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-social-security%2F%3Faid%3D10953%26source%3Disaeditxt0010931%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-retirement%26ryr-ss-intro-report%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D15161&amp;utm_source=usa-today&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=02dcd335-de87-4db0-a4d0-bae60b92a78a\" rel=\"nofollow sponsored noopener\" target=\"_blank\">View the &#8220;Social Security secrets&#8221; \u00bb<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Selena Maranjian \u00a0|\u00a0 The Motley Fool If you&#8217;ve been paying attention, you&#8217;ll have noticed that while President Donald&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":29789,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[5672,5673,64,1074,5679,1326,451,450,457,5678,255,700,5682,4995,6358,6360,5677,3161,3566,5681,5674,646,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-29788","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-personal-finance","8":"tag-administration","9":"tag-auto","10":"tag-business","11":"tag-exclude","12":"tag-exclude-auto-spike-links","13":"tag-links","14":"tag-negative","15":"tag-overall","16":"tag-overall-negative","17":"tag-pension","18":"tag-personal-finance","19":"tag-retirement","20":"tag-retirement-u0026-pension","21":"tag-security","22":"tag-seniors","23":"tag-seniors-u0026-retirement","24":"tag-services","25":"tag-social","26":"tag-social-security-administration","27":"tag-social-services","28":"tag-spike","29":"tag-u0026","30":"tag-united-states","31":"tag-unitedstates","32":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114777910349402821","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29788\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}