{"id":30744,"date":"2025-07-01T20:21:11","date_gmt":"2025-07-01T20:21:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/30744\/"},"modified":"2025-07-01T20:21:11","modified_gmt":"2025-07-01T20:21:11","slug":"how-trumps-big-budget-bill-would-jumpstart-his-immigration-agenda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/30744\/","title":{"rendered":"How Trump&#8217;s big budget bill would jumpstart his immigration agenda"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>WASHINGTON\u00a0\u2014\u00a0Building the border wall. Increasing detention capacity. Hiring thousands of immigration agents. <\/p>\n<p>The budget bill <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/politics\/story\/2025-07-01\/trump-megabill-senate-vote\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">narrowly approved<\/a> by the Senate on Tuesday includes massive funding infusions \u2014 roughly $150 billion \u2014 toward immigration and border enforcement. If passed, the \u201cOne Big Beautiful Bill Act\u201d will cement Trump\u2019s hard-line legacy on immigration. <\/p>\n<p>The budget bill would make Immigration and Customs Enforcement the <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org\/blog\/house-reconciliation-bill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">highest-funded law enforcement agency<\/a> in the federal government, exceeding its current yearly $3.4-billion detention budget many times over. It also would impose fees on immigration services that were once free or less expensive and make it easier for local law enforcement to work with federal authorities on immigration.<\/p>\n<p>The 940-page Senate bill will now head back to the House, which passed its version in May, also by one vote, 215-214. The two chambers must now reconcile the two versions of the bill.<\/p>\n<p>Though the legislation is still evolving, the immigration provisions in the House and Senate versions are similar and not subject to the intense debates on other issues, such as Medicaid or taxes. <\/p>\n<p>Many of the funds would be available for four years, though some have longer or shorter timelines. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that, if enacted, the bill would <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.budget.senate.gov\/ranking-member\/newsroom\/press\/cbo-tells-merkley-that-republicans-one-big-beautiful-bill-is-out-of-compliance-with-the-rules-of-reconciliation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">increase the deficit<\/a> by nearly $3.5 trillion over the next 10 years. <\/p>\n<p>Here are key elements concerning immigration:<\/p>\n<p>Border wall<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>$46.5 billion toward fortifying the U.S.-Mexico border wall and interdicting migrant smugglers at sea. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This includes construction and installation of barrier sections, building access roads, and barrier-related technology, such as cameras, lights and sensors. The legislation doesn\u2019t reference specific locations. <\/p>\n<p>Trump, in his first term, repeatedly vowed that Mexico would pay for the wall. It didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>Staffing<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>$32 billion for immigration enforcement, including staffing of ICE and expanding so-called 287(g) agreements, in which state and local law enforcement agencies partner with federal authorities to deport immigrants. <\/li>\n<li>$7 billion for hiring Border Patrol agents, customs officers at ports of entry, air and marine agents and field support staff; retention bonuses; and vehicles. <\/li>\n<li>$3.3 billion to hire immigration judges and support staff, among other provisions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Trump has said he wants to hire 10,000 ICE agents, as well as 3,000 Border Patrol agents. <\/p>\n<p>Detention<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>$45 billion to build and operate immigrant detention facilities and to transport those being deported.<\/li>\n<li>$5 billion for new Customs and Border Protection facilities and improvements to existing facilities and checkpoints. It\u2019s unclear how this could affect California or the well-known Border Patrol checkpoint on Interstate 5 near San Onofre.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The bill allows for families pending a removal decision to be detained indefinitely. Heidi Altman, vice president of policy at the National Immigration Law Center, called that a blatant violation of the so-called Flores settlement agreement, which has been in place since 1977 and limits the amount of time children can legally be detained to 20 days. <\/p>\n<p>Local assistance<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>$13.5 billion to reimburse states and local governments for immigration-related costs. These are divided into two pots of funding: $10 billion for the \u201cstate border security reinforcement fund\u201d and the \u201cBridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide\u201d or BIDEN fund. Both would fund the arrest of immigrants by local law enforcement who unlawfully entered the U.S. and committed any crime. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Altman said: \u201cYou can think of it like a gift for [Texas Gov. Greg] Abbott.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Immigration fees<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A fee of at least $100 for those seeking asylum, down from a $1,000 fee outlined in the House bill. Applicants also would pay $100 every year the application remains pending. This is unprecedented \u2014 a fee has never before been imposed on migrants fleeing persecution. <\/li>\n<li>At least $550 ($275 on renewal) to apply for employment authorization for those with asylum applications, humanitarian parole and temporary protected status. Currently there is no fee for asylum seekers and a $470 fee for others.<\/li>\n<li>At least $500 for temporary protected status, up from $80 including biometrics. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The stated fees are minimums \u2014 the bill allows for annual increases and, for many, prohibits waivers based on financial need. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe paradox of a fee for an employment authorization document is that you\u2019re not allowed to work, but you need to pay for the fee,\u201d said Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst with the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. <\/p>\n<p>Altman noted that imposing a yearly fee on asylum seekers for their pending applications punishes people for the U.S. government\u2019s own backlogged system, which is out of the applicant\u2019s control. <\/p>\n<p>Other sections exclude lawfully present immigrants, such as refugees and those granted asylum, from benefits including Medicare, Medicaid and the supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP). Another provision excludes children from the Child Tax Credit if their parent lacks a Social Security number. <\/p>\n<p>Praise and scorn<\/p>\n<p>Altman, whose organization has closely tracked the immigration aspects of the funding bill, said people can look at the bill two ways: big picture \u2014 as a $150-billion infusion to supercharge what the Trump administration has already started \u2014 or surgically, as a series of policy changes that will not be easy to undo \u201cand make an already corrupt system subject to even fewer safeguards and really go after people\u2019s most basic needs.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Bush-Joseph had a different view. She said the funding reinforces an outdated and inflexible immigration system without fundamentally changing it. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s why there\u2019s all this money going to the border even though there aren\u2019t a lot of people coming now,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<p>Money alone won\u2019t change things overnight, said Bush-Joseph. It takes time to hire people and to open detention facilities. Immigration judges will still have a massive backlog of cases. And getting foreign countries to agree to accept more deportees is tricky. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cArresting and detaining people with private contractors doesn\u2019t get you to an agreement from El Salvador to take five more planes per week,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<p>During a <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PdqCww2JSlA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">White House event June 26,<\/a> Trump urged Congress to pass the bill quickly, saying it \u201cwill be the single most important piece of border legislation to ever come across the floor of Congress.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), one of three senators who voted against the bill Tuesday, had called it \u201creckless spending,\u201d writing on X: \u201cI\u2019m all for hiring new people to help secure our borders, but we don\u2019t need it to the extent that\u2019s in this bill, especially when our border is largely contained.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Across the political aisle, Democrats including California Sen. Alex Padilla have slammed the bill, saying the immigration-related funding increases amount to a substantial policy change. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou would think that maybe just for a moment, Republicans would take this reconciliation process as an opportunity to do what they said before they wanted to do and modernize our nation\u2019s immigration system,\u201d Padilla <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.padilla.senate.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/padilla-joins-immigration-advocates-to-reject-republicans-extreme-anti-immigrant-budget-reconciliation-bill\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">said last month<\/a>. \u201cBut they\u2019re not.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"WASHINGTON\u00a0\u2014\u00a0Building the border wall. Increasing detention capacity. Hiring thousands of immigration agents. The budget bill narrowly approved by&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":30745,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5123],"tags":[26173,18808,26170,17281,26174,1582,276,12853,26176,26171,8618,409,26175,2961,2934,26172,224,5337,3546,277],"class_list":{"0":"post-30744","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-los-angeles","8":"tag-application","9":"tag-asylum","10":"tag-big-budget-bill","11":"tag-bill","12":"tag-border-enforcement","13":"tag-ca","14":"tag-california","15":"tag-fee","16":"tag-field-support-staff","17":"tag-heidi-altman","18":"tag-immigrant","19":"tag-immigration","20":"tag-kathleen-bush-joseph","21":"tag-la","22":"tag-legislation","23":"tag-local-law-enforcement","24":"tag-los-angeles","25":"tag-losangeles","26":"tag-people","27":"tag-trump"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114779841163536238","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30744\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}