{"id":310649,"date":"2025-10-17T11:58:22","date_gmt":"2025-10-17T11:58:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/310649\/"},"modified":"2025-10-17T11:58:22","modified_gmt":"2025-10-17T11:58:22","slug":"appealing-your-nyc-property-taxes-dont-expect-a-quick-answer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/310649\/","title":{"rendered":"Appealing Your NYC Property Taxes? Don\u2019t Expect a Quick Answer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hundreds of petitions are filed in New York City each day throughout September and October challenging the city\u2019s property tax assessments. <\/p>\n<p>On one Thursday last month, there were more than 500 petitions filed in Manhattan alone, including from hotels, major retailers such as Macy\u2019s and Bloomingdale\u2019s, and property owners including the New York City Bar Association, the James Beard Foundation, and New York University. And thousands more have continued to roll in as petitioners scramble to meet an Oct. 24 filing deadline.<\/p>\n<p>The defendant in each, often written in all capital letters: THE TAX COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, AND THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.<\/p>\n<p>The filings are part of an annual song and dance for attorneys, the Tax Commission, the New York City Law Department, and the court system. There are nearly 300,000 or more open petitions\u2014including a handful dating back to the 1970s and petitions submitted over multiple years for the same lot\u2014that have been filed with the court, according to Tax Commission data. Nearly 200,000 of those were filed in the past five years, and more than 2,100 are awaiting trial. <\/p>\n<p>There are just four judges in the entire city to handle the thousands of cases that reach them\u2014and several other reasons for the city to slow-roll the process. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cTime goes by quickly, and you\u2019re dealing with owners who have enormous demands on them,\u201d said Robert Pollack of Marcus &amp; Pollack LLP. Owners are \u201csitting there dying on the vine.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Assessments <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1760702301_262_\" data-alignment=\"center\" data-size=\"embedded\"\/> <\/p>\n<p>The city\u2019s Department of Finance calculates tax assessments for each parcel of property and publishes them every January. Property owners have until March to file an application seeking a correction\u2014typically a reduction\u2014to the assessment. If the commission hasn\u2019t held a hearing on a particular application or if an owner rejects the commission\u2019s offer, the owner has until Oct. 24 file what\u2019s known as an Article 7\u2014or tax certiorari\u2014petition with the court.<\/p>\n<p>But to get before a judge, there have to be three years of outstanding petitions. Owners re-file their petitions every year to preserve their review, explained Martha Stark, policy director of Tax Equity Now, or TENNY. The group is the lead plaintiff on a <a data-terminal-id=\"SSM8E0T0G1KW\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bloombergtax.com\/daily-tax-report-state\/nyc-property-tax-fix-bill-set-for-april-as-reform-lawsuit-looms\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">closely-watched lawsuit<\/a> challenging the property tax code, which is working its way through a state trial court.<\/p>\n<p>The more than 2,000 pending cases seeking judicial intervention is a record high, said Benjamin Williams of Rosenberg &amp; Estis PC. <\/p>\n<p>While tax attorneys lament the long wait times, the city asserts its attorneys are moving matters more quickly than in years past and that complaints about delays are from attorneys who \u201cjust want to get their own clients moved up in the process.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Waiting Game<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A request for judicial intervention doesn\u2019t necessarily make the process go any faster\u2014it merely puts the case on the court\u2019s calendar and escalates it to one of the four judges, kicking off pre-trial settlement negotiations with the Law Department and the Bankruptcy Division.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioners can go to trial in their county\u2019s Supreme Court if their case doesn\u2019t settle, but trials in New York City are rare, Williams said. Court data show zero trials since 2024.<\/p>\n<p>But the paucity of judges isn\u2019t the sole reason for the delays. Some tax litigators say it\u2019s the New York City Law Department persuading judges not to issue scheduling orders that would set a timeline by which both parties would get the appraisals they need to move forward with negotiations. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s to the city\u2019s advantage to delay the resolution of cases, unfortunately, at the cost of property owners,\u201d said Pollack, who is also president of the Real Estate Tax Review Bar Association. <\/p>\n<p> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1760702302_945_\" data-alignment=\"center\" data-size=\"embedded\"\/> <\/p>\n<p>The city also doesn\u2019t have to pay back interest on overpaid taxes unless the property owner goes to court and wins. Property owners continue to pay taxes at the assessed rates, further incentivizing delays.<\/p>\n<p>The Law Department holds settlement conferences only once every three months and \u201cvery often you make no progress\u201d in those conferences, said Pollack.<\/p>\n<p>Stark recalled one case in which a building owner waited seven years before getting a reduction for two years\u2019 worth of petitions, all because the building\u2019s square footage was calculated incorrectly. Williams also said he has cases that have been open for five to 10 years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s time consuming, especially for mistakes like square footage,\u201d said Stark, a former commissioner of the New York City Department of Finance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Dealing With the Backlog<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Law Department said its attorneys \u201cdiligently evaluate requests for tax reductions.\u201d Delays can happen when petitioners don\u2019t respond to the agency\u2019s request for information in a timely manner, or when \u201coverly litigious parties and frivolous cases waste resources and add to the high volume of matters.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The agency also emphasized it\u2019s still recovering from losing numerous tax attorneys during the Covid-19 pandemic, saying, \u201cNevertheless, due to our enhanced recruiting efforts over the years and our expert team, we\u2019ve been able to address obstacles and continue to meet our mission to fairly and efficiently evaluate these complex cases.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And the workload isn\u2019t expected to stop. Peter Blond of Brandt, Steinberg, Lewis &amp; Blond LLP said he expects there will be more trials coming up in the next two years, stemming from petitions that were filed during the pandemic and are finally able to escalate to a judge.<\/p>\n<p>The results of the <a data-terminal-id=\"T3X9GCGOYMTD\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bloombergtax.com\/daily-tax-report\/new-yorkers-face-likely-tax-hikes-no-matter-who-becomes-mayor\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">mayoral race<\/a> could also bring real estate taxes into the spotlight as Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani has discussed raising taxes. All of that is happening against the backdrop of massive federal funding cuts to the entire state.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s interesting times in a field that normally, quite frankly, is like watching paint dry,\u201d Blond said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Hundreds of petitions are filed in New York City each day throughout September and October challenging the city\u2019s&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":310650,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[5229,156876,156875,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,156877,11189,61024,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-310649","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-lead-plaintiff","10":"tag-municipal-tax","11":"tag-new-york","12":"tag-new-york-city","13":"tag-newyork","14":"tag-newyorkcity","15":"tag-ny","16":"tag-nyc","17":"tag-overpayment-of-tax","18":"tag-property-tax","19":"tag-settlements","20":"tag-united-states","21":"tag-united-states-of-america","22":"tag-unitedstates","23":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","24":"tag-us","25":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115389394122923504","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310649","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310649\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/310650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}