{"id":330956,"date":"2025-10-25T06:39:33","date_gmt":"2025-10-25T06:39:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/330956\/"},"modified":"2025-10-25T06:39:33","modified_gmt":"2025-10-25T06:39:33","slug":"taylor-swifts-life-of-a-showgirl-had-a-huge-drop-off-that-tells-us-something","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/330956\/","title":{"rendered":"Taylor Swift\u2019s Life of a Showgirl had a huge drop-off. That tells us something."},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"84\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5as33n001eepksicb4ru5h@published\">A couple of months ago, when we first heard about The Life of a Showgirl, Taylor Swift\u2019s heavily hyped 12th album of new material, <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2025\/08\/taylor-swift-new-heights-travis-kelce-podcast-album.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">on an episode of her fianc\u00e9 Travis Kelce\u2019s podcast<\/a>, we were told it <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tiktok.com\/@theandiesummersshow\/video\/7538400179905432863\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">contained all \u201cbangers<\/a>.\u201d This was interpreted to mean reliably catchy, super-accessible pop of the kind she did a decade ago on her blockbuster album <a href=\"https:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/arts\/music_box\/2014\/10\/taylor_swift_s_1989_reviewed_could_the_secret_to_the_pop_star_s_world_conquering.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1989<\/a>, which would differentiate the LP from her <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2022\/10\/taylor-swift-midnights-album-review-3am-lyrics.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">recent<\/a>, more <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2024\/04\/taylor-swift-tortured-poets-department-album-review.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">contemplative<\/a> output. I\u2019d like to trouble that thesis with a quick longitudinal study.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"61\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asmsm000o35799ktg0qq7@published\">So here goes: Eight of Swift\u2019s last nine studio albums led off with a No.\u00a01 hit on Billboard\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/charts\/hot-100\/2012-09-01\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hot\u00a0100<\/a>. Let\u2019s consider these leadoff singles in two sets: the 2010s and the 2020s. (Though Swift has racked up further No.\u00a01s deeper into her album promotional campaigns, I\u2019m focusing on first singles.) Here\u2019s the first set, Taylor\u2019s album-leading No.\u00a01 hits of the 2010s:<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"66\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asn5l000t3579kym3ppwf@published\">A footnote to the \u201910s list: In 2019, Swift would have scored another album-leading No.\u00a01\u2014Lover\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2019\/04\/taylor-swift-me-review-new-single-and-video-says-even-less-than-she-wants-you-to-think.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ME!<\/a>\u201d featuring Brendon Urie of Panic! at the Disco\u2014if it hadn\u2019t gotten stuck at No.\u00a02 behind the <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2019\/07\/lil-nas-x-old-town-road-billboard-chart-record-longest-number-1.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">chart-conquering streamroller<\/a> that was Lil Nas X\u2019s 19-week No. 1 \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/1478025514\/?tag=slatmaga-20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Old Town Road<\/a>.\u201d So, though \u201cME!\u201d is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/music\/music-lists\/taylor-swift-songs-ranked-rob-sheffield-201800\/me-lover-2019-924554\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">one of the least-loved Taylor hits<\/a>, let\u2019s tack it onto the above list as a not-so-honorable mention.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"83\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asn8d000u3579bux9twvl@published\">Play those four 2010s smashes back-to-back, and a picture emerges of a young woman who loves frothy, peppy bops\u2014from the bordering-on-pop-punk verve of \u201cWe Are Never Ever Getting Back Together\u201d to the cheerleader chant of \u201cShake It Off.\u201d Even the spookiest, 2017\u2019s spiteful \u201cLook What You Made Me Do,\u201d is uptempo and sparkly, borrowing its chorus cadence from Right Said Fred\u2019s camp classic \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whosampled.com\/sample\/522871\/Taylor-Swift-Look-What-You-Made-Me-Do-Right-Said-Fred-I%27m-Too-Sexy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">I\u2019m Too Sexy<\/a>.\u201d Bottom line, when Swift pivoted from country to pop, she went pop\u2014maximally, for most of a decade.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"17\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asnb6000v3579s9vy994d@published\">Now, consider this other list. These are Swift\u2019s album-leading No. 1s of the 2020s. Notice anything different?<\/p>\n<ul data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-list\/instances\/cmh5b00ga002f3579kz4q3cr9@published\" class=\"slate-list\">\n<li>\n<p>\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2020\/08\/taylor-swift-folklore-sales-cardigan-billboard-hot-100.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cardigan<\/a>\u201d (from Folklore, one week at No. 1, 2020)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/music\/music-news\/taylor-swift-wrote-willow-less-than-10-minutes-aaron-dessner-1234911325\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Willow<\/a>\u201d (from Evermore, one week, 2020)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2022\/11\/taylor-swift-midnights-drake-beatles-billboard-hot-100.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Anti-Hero<\/a>\u201d (from Midnights, eight weeks, 2022\u201323)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2024\/05\/taylor-swift-fortnight-song-tortured-poets-department-billboard.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Fortnight<\/a>\u201d (from The Tortured Poets Department, two weeks, 2024)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>\u00a0\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ko70cExuzZM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Fate of Ophelia<\/a>\u201d (from The Life of a Showgirl, two weeks to date, 2025)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"84\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asnsa00113579l47r3y7z@published\">Play these five songs back-to-back, and a picture emerges of a sullen, cerebral songwriter who pairs melodic tropes from folk or indie-rock with grown-ass-woman ruminations\u2014from the world-weary feminism of \u201cCardigan\u201d to the listless longing of \u201cFortnight.\u201d The biggest hit here, 2022\u2019s \u201cAnti-Hero,\u201d despite sporting one of Swift\u2019s most irresistible melodies, is still a dark, sighing, self-denigrating therapy session (whence came the would-be catchphrase \u201cI\u2019m the problem, it\u2019s me\u201d). Bottom line, when Swift reached her 30s and her post-pandemic worldview turned broody, she stayed broody.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"81\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asnwb00123579ot8vc8d0@published\">That broodiness extends to our current No.\u00a01 song, the <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2020\/12\/taylor-swift-31-13-clues.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lucky 13th<\/a> No.\u00a01 of Taylor Swift\u2019s career. We were told Swift\u2019s reunion on Showgirl with <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2014\/07\/max-martin-lyrics-are-silly-from-britney-spears-and-the-backstreet-boys-to-ariana-grandes-break-free-his-most-ungrammatical-lines.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Max Martin and Shellback<\/a>\u2014the Swedish producers and songwriters behind her <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2014\/12\/taylor-swift-blank-space-is-back-to-back-number-1-hit-with-shake-it-off-is-this-her-imperial-moment.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">biggest<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2015\/06\/taylor-swifts-bad-blood-featuring-kendrick-lamar-is-no-1-heres-why-the-remix-is-the-avengers-age-of-ultron-of-pop.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hits<\/a> a decade ago\u2014was going to augur a comeback for sparkly, spunky \u201910s Taylor. And yet, here we are, still rocking with moody, broody \u201920s Taylor. I mean, is a song named after the poor girl who went mad in Shakespeare\u2019s Hamlet your idea of spunk?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"119\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asnze001335792a0vjxda@published\">Make no mistake, \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d is hella catchy\u2014but then, so was \u201cAnti-Hero.\u201d Among Swift\u2019s 2020s album-leading smashes, I would say \u201cOphelia\u201d is her most banger-adjacent. But admit it, a couple of weeks ago, the first time you heard the opening seconds of the song\u2014a mellow beat-drop seemingly cribbed from the top of Fleetwood Mac\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5oWyMakvQew\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dreams<\/a>,\u201d followed by some very gentle piano chords\u2014didn\u2019t you think, \u201cHuh \u2026 I guess we\u2019re doing this again\u201d? I know I did. There\u2019s something both warmly familiar and dutifully predictable in Swift\u2019s hitmaking. At this late <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/podcasts\/hit-parade\/2025\/02\/when-madonna-ruled-the-pop-charts\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Imperial<\/a> stage in her career, the big revelations come from how she announces her albums (down to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vogue.com\/article\/taylor-swifts-orange-era\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">color palette<\/a>), not the sound of their lead singles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"127\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5aso2200143579z2wbkhi2@published\">In short, there is no mystery to why \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d is No. 1. As I say in <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2023\/10\/cruel-summer-number-1-taylor-swift-billboard.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">this Slate series<\/a> every time Taylor Swift returns to the top of the Hot\u00a0100, it\u2019s because she\u2019s Taylor Swift, this is her world, and we are living in it. As the stats above also indicate, Swift\u2019s chart-topping status is heavily frontloaded each time she drops an album\u2014everybody shows up in week one, but how the LP and its songs fare commercially from there is more variable. Now that The Life of a Showgirl is more than two weeks old, we can assess just how much staying power this Era has. Short version: The album, as an album, seems to be falling off quickly. The singles \u2026 maybe not.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"86\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5aso4r00153579f326037c@published\">First, the album. When Showgirl made its debut last week, it opened to a record 4\u00a0million <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Album-equivalent_unit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">album-equivalent units<\/a> (that\u2019s traditional sales plus bundles of streams, as per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/pro\/billboard-changes-streaming-weighting-hot-100-billboard-200\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Billboard\u2019s math<\/a>). That\u2019s the biggest week of album consumption ever, or at least <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theringer.com\/2021\/05\/25\/music\/soundscan-billboard-charts-streaming-numbers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">since the charts were computerized with Soundscan technology in 1991<\/a>. And Taylor\u2019s album-sales total included nearly 3.5\u00a0million in \u201cpure\u201d sales, which beats\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/blogs\/browbeat\/2015\/11\/06\/adele_s_hello_is_no_1_on_the_hot_100_has_broken_every_record_is_the_ultimate.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hello!<\/a>\u2014the previous record-holder, nearly a full decade ago: <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2015\/12\/adele-s-25-is-the-biggest-opening-album-of-all-time-n-sync-might-give-us-some-clues-as-to-why.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the first week of Adele\u2019s blockbuster album 25<\/a>, which sold nearly 3.4\u00a0million copies back in November 2015.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"182\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5aso7800163579d7m44vv4@published\">I put the word \u201cpure\u201d in the previous paragraph in scare quotes, not because the sales figures Billboard reported are corrupt, but rather because Swift has advantages and (totally legal) ways to game the charts that weren\u2019t available a decade ago. The biggest X-factor for Taylor in 2025 over Adele in 2015 is actually not streaming music. It\u2019s vinyl. The comeback of the wax long-player was still in its infancy back then\u2014in the first week of 25, which Adele did make available on vinyl, she sold a positively quaint 22,000 LPs, which at the time was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/pro\/adele-25-historic-chart-numbers\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the third-largest vinyl sales total in Soundscan history<\/a>. A decade later, a number like that would be a rounding error for <a href=\"https:\/\/billboard.substack.com\/p\/sabrina-carpenter-mans-best-friend-album-how-big-first-week\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sabrina Carpenter<\/a>, let alone Taylor Swift. In its first week, Showgirl sold <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2025\/10\/14\/nx-s1-5570850\/taylor-swift-vinyl-sales-showgirl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1.3\u00a0million copies on vinyl alone<\/a>. And did I mention all the variants? Swift sold <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cosmopolitan.com\/entertainment\/celebs\/g69000859\/taylor-swift-the-life-of-a-showgirl-variants\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">eight varieties of Showgirl vinyl<\/a>. Back in 2015, Adele wasn\u2019t offering 25 in a variety of LP covers or colored vinyl. (Or even compact discs: Adele sold one standard CD package of 25; Swift sold 18 different CD packages.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"155\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5aso9p00173579dkul2njo@published\">It\u2019s safe to assume some significant percentage of Showgirl\u2019s opening-week sales were hardcore Swifties who felt the need to, as they say on kiddie TV, Collect \u2019em all! Indeed, when Showgirl posted a gobsmacking tally of 2.7\u00a0million copies on its first day (!) the trades reported that <a href=\"https:\/\/variety.com\/2025\/music\/news\/taylor-swift-album-sales-first-day-billboard-million-showgirl-1236540366\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the bulk of that sum was album preorders that shipped on day one<\/a>\u2014many via Swift\u2019s own webstore, which surely included a lot of repeat buyers. (How many? We\u2019ll never know.) After that blockbuster first day, when it became clear Adele\u2019s sales benchmark was vulnerable, Team Swift pulled out all the stops, releasing new limited-edition CD variants midweek to goose her most loyal fans to buy, buy, buy again. The result: a final sales tally of 3.479 million, about 100,000 copies more than Adele\u2019s 25 debut week, and also a whopping 80 percent higher than the opening sales of Swift\u2019s own previous album, <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2024\/04\/taylor-swift-tortured-poets-department-album-review.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Tortured Poets Department<\/a>. Just absurd.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"158\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asoct00183579pigi7s1p@published\">As Swift\u2019s many friends and associates have reported over the years, <a href=\"https:\/\/variety.com\/2024\/music\/global\/lana-del-rey-taylor-swift-success-wants-it-more-than-anyone-1236028451\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Taylor likes to win<\/a>. That includes on the charts. I\u2019ve been asked in the past week, presumably by Adele fans: Is this fair? My short answer: Yes, with an asterisk. This is chart gaming, but it\u2019s not <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/pro\/features\/radio-stations-hit-pay-for-play-867825\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">payola<\/a>\u2014Swift\u2019s sales tactics are pretty transparent, in all senses of that word. The only question was, by how big a margin. Sure, given all those vinyl and CD variants, there\u2019ll always be an aftertaste on Swift\u2019s sales achievement\u2014much the way Lady Gaga\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2011\/05\/born-this-way-lady-gaga-s-new-album-is-a-pop-rapture.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Born This Way<\/a> sold <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/music\/music-news\/its-official-lady-gagas-born-this-way-sells-111-million-1177671\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1.1\u00a0million in its 2011 debut<\/a>, but that milestone has a taint because <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vulture.com\/2011\/06\/guess_how_much_money_amazon_lo.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Amazon deep-discounted the album at 99 cents<\/a> (a then-chart-legal loophole that has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.villagevoice.com\/100-single-what-billboards-rule-changes-mean-for-the-britney-michael-and-gaga-albums-you-bought\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">since been closed by Billboard<\/a>). It\u2019s useful to know these footnotes for historical purposes, but both the Gaga album in 2011 and the Swift album in 2025 would have debuted at No. 1 in any case, by a huge margin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"142\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asofo00193579qa326vkz@published\">And what about the Swift LP\u2019s second week? Just as \u201cwhat goes up must come down,\u201d what opens bigger falls harder. In week two, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/music\/chart-beat\/taylor-swift-showgirl-second-week-number-one-billboard-200-1236092614\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Showgirl dropped 92 percent in album-equivalent units<\/a> (the metric that includes streaming), from 4\u00a0million to 338,000, and dropped a stunning 97 percent in pure sales, from 3.5\u00a0million to just over 100,000. (Swift\u2019s last two albums, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/music\/chart-beat\/taylor-swift-tortured-poets-department-number-one-second-week-billboard-200-chart-1235674109\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tortured Poets<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/music\/chart-beat\/taylor-swift-midnights-number-one-billboard-200-2nd-week-1235167312\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Midnights<\/a>, had sizable but more modest second-week drops.) This has prompted some <a href=\"https:\/\/poprant.indiatimes.com\/trending\/taylor-swifts-the-life-of-a-showgirl-crashes-91-from-4-million-to-345k-in-week-two-fans-call-out-shameless-tactics-673500.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">commentariat froth<\/a> that this drop affirms Showgirl\u2019s fundamental weakness as an album, after a fortnight of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.buzzfeed.com\/natashajokic1\/taylor-swift-life-of-a-showgirl-opinion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">grumbling<\/a> over the album\u2019s lack of actual bangers. I think the simpler explanation is that even Swift\u2019s fandom has limits, and if you get more Swifties to buy early, you\u2019ll find fewer converts down the road. However <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2025\/10\/taylor-swift-life-of-a-showgirl-album-lyrics-review.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">middling its reviews<\/a> or checkered its legacy, The Life of a Showgirl will be fine.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"193\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asoi5001a3579c3670kyg@published\">That includes\u2014oh yeah!\u2014the songs, which are actually showing greater staying power on the Hot\u00a0100 than <a href=\"https:\/\/genius.com\/3933188\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the haters<\/a> might have expected. In week one, in another major chart feat that surprised absolutely no one, Showgirl\u2019s 12 tracks <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/lists\/taylor-swift-hot-100-fate-of-ophelia-number-one\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">instantly debuted in the top 12 positions on the Hot\u00a0100<\/a>\u2014the third straight time Swift has locked down the chart\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/charts\/hot-100\/2025-10-18\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">entire Top 10<\/a>. (She is still <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/TaylorSwift\/comments\/1o5sabh\/only_times_one_artist_has_occupied_the_entire_top\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the only artist to do this<\/a>.) But the more impressive achievement this time is how the songs are holding on the charts. The previous two times Taylor dominated the whole Top 10, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/lists\/taylor-swift-hot-100-top-14-fortnight-post-malone-record\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 with her Tortured Poets tracks<\/a> and in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/music\/chart-beat\/taylor-swift-all-hot-100-top-10-anti-hero-1235163664\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 with her Midnights tracks<\/a>, a week later she retained less than half of the Top 10. This time, in week two, Showgirl tracks still take up <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/charts\/hot-100\/2025-10-25\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">eight of the Top\u00a010<\/a>. By the way, in case you\u2019ve been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/10\/10\/arts\/music\/popcast-taylor-swift-showgirl-reader-questions.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">debating the merits of the album\u2019s songs<\/a> and are curious now that the marketplace has spoken, America\u2019s five favorite Showgirl album cuts (i.e., besides \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d) are, in descending order: \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=4FUIEcnvT04\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opalite<\/a>\u201d (which will almost surely be the second single), \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=4Mg_Qtr6Osg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Elizabeth Taylor<\/a>,\u201d \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=98SmlWOKuME\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Father Figure<\/a>,\u201d \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=mC54kTYa9oI\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wi$h Li$t<\/a>,\u201d and the gleefully raunchy, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wood_(song)#Critical_reception\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">much-maligned<\/a> \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=6m50keINEOI\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wood<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"215\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asoks001b3579p5ywsmy6@published\">Among that assortment, \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d emerges as the album\u2019s median hit, a song that summarizes the whole Showgirl aesthetic: mellower than expected, deceptively optimistic. As I said earlier, broody contemplation has been Swift\u2019s mode this whole decade, and \u201cOphelia\u201d slots right into that meta-narrative. Just by invoking Shakespeare\u2019s wronged, suicidal heroine\u2014a woman who represents collateral damage to a man\u2019s main-character syndrome\u2014Swift is once again centering a kind of ruminative feminism in her pop, \u00e0 la \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/genius.com\/20416113\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cardigan<\/a>.\u201d But the twist in the lyrics is that a considerate lover (one who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/sports\/chiefs-te-travis-kelce-extremely-grateful-new-deal-2024-05-01\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">wears tights like Hamlet<\/a> but otherwise has little in common with the pensive Dane) has rescued Swift\u2019s protagonist from becoming Ophelia: \u201cAnd if you\u2019d never come for me\/ I might\u2019ve drowned in the melancholy \u2026 You dug me out of my grave and\/ Saved my heart from the fate of\/ Ophelia.\u201d Swift has been <a href=\"https:\/\/shakespeareanstudent.com\/2025\/04\/04\/shakespeare-and-taylor-swift\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rewriting Shakespeare<\/a> almost as long as she\u2019s been writing songs. Way back in 2008, her No.\u00a01 country hit \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=8xg3vE8Ie_E\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Love Story<\/a>\u201d reimagined Romeo and Juliet ending with a white wedding instead of a bloody dagger. \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d finds Swift with a more mature worldview, but the song\u2019s implied resolution is, once again, a wedding. It\u2019s rather clever, the way it masks its starry-eyed buoyancy behind that almost goth title.<\/p>\n<p>    <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2025\/10\/dangelo-singer-death-how-does-it-feel-voodoo-black-messiah.html\" class=\"recirc-line__content\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><\/p>\n<p>          <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cd9559c1-94ed-40c3-9156-6b19150c3611.jpeg\" width=\"141\" height=\"94\"   alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\n          Jack Hamilton<br \/>\n        The Man Behind Two of the Greatest Albums of the Century Is Gone<br \/>\n        <b class=\"slate-link--bold recirc-line__read-more\">Read More<\/b>\n      <\/p>\n<p>    <\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"240\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asona001c3579hccb13p2@published\">The buoyancy extends to the music, once you get past that misleadingly minor-key opening. The song\u2019s synthy bassline is gently funky, its chorus yanking the song from sleepy to perky, like a cheerleader who\u2019s taken Ritalin. The moment in \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d you can tell Max Martin worked on it is actually the post-chorus\u2014the bit that <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.tonicaudio.com\/the-melodic-math-of-producer-max-martin\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">mathematically<\/a> interpolates the refrain and puts an irresistible, chant-like button on it: \u201cKeep it one hundred on the land (Land), th\u0435 sea (Sea), the sky\/ Pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes.\u201d As written English, it\u2019s a mouthful that means very little (kinda like that Max Martin classic, \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=4fndeDfaWCg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ain\u2019t nothin\u2019 but a heartbreak \u2026 Ain\u2019t nothin\u2019 but a heartache<\/a>\u201d). Rhythmically, it\u2019s the best part of the song. Among Swift\u2019s oeuvre, it echoes the catchiest moment in the Martin-produced \u201cWe Are Never Ever Getting Back Together,\u201d 13 years ago\u2014the third line of that chorus that went, \u201cYou go talk to your friends, talk to my friends, talk to me.\u201d Swift and Martin pull the same crowd-rousing, wave-your-arms-in-the-air trick in \u201cOphelia.\u201d Mind you, I wasn\u2019t in the room when Swift, Martin, and Shellback worked on this song, but Martin just seems to bring these satisfyingly symmetrical flourishes out of Swift. It all adds up to, if not a banger, a solid bop\u2014Swift\u2019s post-Folklore \u201cindie\u201d-pop run through the Max Martin machine. (Certainly not the first time Max has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2014\/12\/02\/368013489\/anatomy-of-a-hit-kelly-clarksons-since-u-been-gone\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rebooted indie rock as mass-appeal pop<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<ol class=\"in-article-recirc__list\">\n<li class=\"in-article-recirc__item\">\n          <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2025\/10\/a-house-of-dynamite-movie-netflix-ending-explained.html\" class=\"in-article-recirc__link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><\/p>\n<p>            I\u2019ve Been Writing About Nuclear War for 40 Years. No Movie Has Shaken Me Like This One.<br \/>\n          <\/a>\n        <\/li>\n<li class=\"in-article-recirc__item\">\n          <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2025\/10\/bugonia-emma-stone-movie-ending-jesse-plemons-oscars.html\" class=\"in-article-recirc__link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n            This Content is Available for Slate Plus members only<\/p>\n<p>            It\u2019s Going to Be Nominated for All the Oscars. I Hated It.<br \/>\n          <\/a>\n        <\/li>\n<li class=\"in-article-recirc__item\">\n          <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2025\/10\/taylor-swift-fate-ophelia-life-showgirl-billboard-100.html\" class=\"in-article-recirc__link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><\/p>\n<p>            America Is Already Moving On From Taylor Swift\u2019s New Album\u2014With One Major Exception<br \/>\n          <\/a>\n        <\/li>\n<li class=\"in-article-recirc__item\">\n          <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/culture\/2025\/10\/dodgers-blue-jays-world-series-2025-baseball.html\" class=\"in-article-recirc__link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><\/p>\n<p>            If You\u2019re an American, There\u2019s One Team to Root For This World Series<br \/>\n          <\/a>\n        <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"179\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asopz001d35796hjv5b58@published\">What does this mean for the song\u2019s chart prospects? Right now, \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d is No.\u00a01 for the same reason \u201cCardigan\u201d or \u201cWillow\u201d were No.\u00a01\u2014because it\u2019s Taylor Swift. On streaming services, \u201cOphelia\u201d opened to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/lists\/taylor-swift-hot-100-fate-of-ophelia-number-one\/swifts-13th-hot-100-no-1\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a record 92.5 million streams, the biggest weekly total of the 2020s<\/a>, and is still putting up big streaming numbers (nearly 50\u00a0million in week two). But it\u2019s not surprising that very online Swift fans are playing the hell out of it. Could \u201cOphelia\u201d have the kind of lengthy Hot\u00a0100 run, with more casual listeners, of an \u201cAnti-Hero\u201d\u2014which not only topped the chart for eight weeks but <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/artist\/taylor-swift\/chart-history\/hsi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rode the chart for more than a year<\/a>? Or is it more like last year\u2019s \u201cFortnight,\u201d which never quite caught on at radio and was off the chart in just a few months? Early signs are promising: On Billboard\u2019s Radio Songs chart, \u201cOphelia\u201d is already higher than \u201cFortnight\u201d peaked\u2014currently it has the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/charts\/radio-songs\/2025-10-25\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">fifth-biggest airplay audience<\/a> overall (better than \u201cFortnight\u2019s\u201d No.\u00a07 radio ceiling)\u2014and that\u2019s after just, well, a fortnight. It could wind up a sneakily resilient, mid-tier Taylor favorite.<\/p>\n<p class=\"slate-paragraph slate-graf\" data-word-count=\"156\" data-uri=\"slate.com\/_components\/slate-paragraph\/instances\/cmh5asotv001e3579aooww2nw@published\">But should she be aiming higher? Should we be invoking an earlier Taylor hitmaking era\u2014the one everybody thought she was trying to evoke by bringing back Max and Shellback? Fans are understandably wistful for the mid-\u201910s days of epic Swift\u2013Martin\u2013Shellback smashes like \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=vNoKguSdy4Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">I Knew You Were Trouble<\/a>,\u201d \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=e-ORhEE9VVg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Blank Space<\/a>,\u201d \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=-CmadmM5cOk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Style<\/a>,\u201d and \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=tCXGJQYZ9JA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Delicate<\/a>,\u201d pop classics that rode the airwaves and the Hot\u00a0100 for six to nine months apiece. I\u2019m nostalgic for that era, too, but I\u2019m also glad Taylor moved on. If she had slavishly recreated the \u201910s Taylor era beat for beat, the online hordes would probably be complaining about her creative stasis. \u201cThe Fate of Ophelia\u201d is exuberant pop a thirtysomething would produce. As we critics often carp about Taylor, she needed to grow up. So, though she\u2019s back in Maximalist (pun intended) pop mode, her sound is fundamentally that of a gimlet-eyed grownup. Even if it\u2019s a grownup who\u2019s still dreamily planning a wedding.<\/p>\n<p>      Get the best of movies, TV, books, music, and more.\n    <\/p>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/www.tiktok.com\/embed.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A couple of months ago, when we first heard about The Life of a Showgirl, Taylor Swift\u2019s heavily&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":330957,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[171,4000,3571,67,132,68,164216],"class_list":{"0":"post-330956","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-entertainment","8":"tag-entertainment","9":"tag-pop","10":"tag-taylor-swift","11":"tag-united-states","12":"tag-unitedstates","13":"tag-us","14":"tag-why-is-this-songno1"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115433436825508012","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330956"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330956\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/330957"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}